Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02848
Original file (BC-2012-02848.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02848
		COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His record reflects his service in the Republic of Vietnam.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He served in Vietnam and Thailand during the Vietnam Conflict.

In support of his appeal, the applicant provides copies of his 
DD Forms 214, Report of Transfer or Discharge, issued in 
conjunction with his 12 Mar 72 and 11 Jun 76 separations.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Based on the available records, the applicant had continuous 
service from 11 Sept 69 until his discharge on 11 Jun 76.  The 
DD form 214, initially issued in conjunction with his 11 Jun 76 
discharge, reflected 2 years, 7 months and 23 days of foreign 
service.  However, it was administratively corrected in Item 
18f, Foreign Service and/or Sea Service this Period, to reflect 
3 years, 7 months and 23 days of foreign service; and in Item 
19, Indochina or Korea Service since August 5, 1964, to reflect 
Yes.

________________________________________________________________

THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSID recommends denial since they were only able to verify 
foreign service pertaining to the DD Form 214 covering service 
from 13 Mar 72 to 11 Jun 76.  During this period, the applicant 
was permanently assigned at U-Tapao Airfield, Thailand from 
15 Sep 72 to 18 Sep 73, and Ramstein Air Base, Germany from 
20 Oct 73 to 8 Jun 76, for a total foreign service of 3 Years, 
7 months, and 23 days.  

The complete DPSID evaluation, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 
17 Sep 12 for review and response.  As of this date, no response 
has been received by this office (Exhibit D).

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice warranting 
corrective action to reflect the applicant served in Vietnam.  
We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging 
the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that 
relief beyond that already granted administratively is not 
warranted.  In view of the above and in the absence of evidence 
to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting further 
relief in this application.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.

________________________________________________________________



The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-02848 in Executive Session on 5 Feb 2013, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-02848 was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 12 Jun 12, w/atchs. 
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 3 Aug 12, w/atchs.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Sep 12.




                                   Panel Chair


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02467

    Original file (BC-2012-02467.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Also, he knows other veterans who served in Thailand during the same time period and were not in-country; yet, they received both medals. Furthermore, his performance report for the inclusive period 1 Oct 74 to 30 Mar 75, reflects he was assigned to Udorn RTAFB, Thailand; however, this time-frame is outside of the closeout period for award of the VSM and RVCM. ________________________________________________________________ _ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05154

    Original file (BC 2013 05154.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05154 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her spouse’s records be corrected to reflect his foreign service in Vietnam and award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial indicating...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03966

    Original file (BC-2011-03966.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03966 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be updated to reflect his foreign service to Vietnam, Thailand, and the Philippines. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00108

    Original file (BC 2014 00108.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00108 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect: 1. His DD Form 214 should be corrected to reflect this period of time deployed to Thailand, as well as award of the AFOUA, the VSM w/P and the RVNGC w/V. No action required by the Board, as the applicant’s official...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01527

    Original file (BC 2014 01527.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01527 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be updated to reflect award of two (2) Bronze Service Stars (BSSs) for his previously awarded Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The Board should find it in the interest of justice to consider his untimely application because he did not realize the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01875

    Original file (BC-2005-01875.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01875 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 14 Dec 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 reflect award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM), and the Air Force Overseas Ribbon (AFOSR), and his service in Vietnam. A...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03847

    Original file (BC-2012-03847.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03847 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM). The RVCM is awarded to members of the US armed forces who, during the period 1...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02017

    Original file (BC-2012-02017.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    (Already reflected on his DD Form 214) ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His service in Thailand and his AFGCM are not properly reflected on his DD Form 214. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02870

    Original file (BC-2012-02870.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, the DVA denied his claim because he could not provide a copy of his TDY orders or any official verification that he ever deployed to Thailand during the Vietnam War. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 29 Oct 12, by letter, the applicant reiterates his original contentions. _________________________________________________________________ The following...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00408

    Original file (BC 2014 00408.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit E. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He served for a little less than four years because of hazardous missions flown in SEA. While the applicant has not provided conclusive evidence that he completed a TDY to Vietnam, it is our opinion the APR for the period ending 27 Sep 68 coupled with AFPS’s database appear to weigh more in favor of amending the applicant’s DD Form 214 to reflect award of the VSM with one Bronze Service Star...