Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02813
Original file (BC-2012-02813.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
 
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-02813
		COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 2 Apr 2012 be removed from 
the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Three years ago, she was diagnosed with a medical condition 
called Vocal Chord Dysfunction (VCD) and was placed on a "no 
maximal exertion" profile.  She should have been exempted from 
all components of her FA except the abdominal circumference.  On 
2 Apr 2012, she tested on all four components of her FA and as a 
result had a VCD attack, which resulted in a FA failure.

In support of her request, the applicant provides copies of a 
letter from the Medical Director and rebuttal to her Enlisted 
Performance Report (EPR), AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force 
Member's Qualification Status; AF Form 469, Duty Limiting 
Condition Report; AF Form 108, Physical Fitness Education and 
Intervention Processing, and fitness score sheet.

Her complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in 
the grade of senior airman (SrA, E-4).

________________________________________________________________

THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends partial approval.  DPSIM states the 
applicant provided the additional documentation requested per 
their 12 Jul 2012 memorandum.  DPSIM states the cardio, push-up, 
and sit-up components of her FA dated 2 Apr 2012 should reflect 
exempt in AFFMS.  Exemption of the aforementioned components 
will reflect a composite score of 85.5 percent for her FA dated 
2 Apr 2012.

The complete DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 30 Oct 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded 
to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days.  As of 
this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit 
C).

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice warranting 
partial relief.  While the applicant requests her entire FA 
dated 2 Apr 2012, be removed from her records, we note the AF 
Form 422 does not exempt the abdominal circumference component.  
Therefore, we agree with the office of primary responsibility 
(OPR) and recommend the cardio, push-up, and sit-up components 
of her FA be corrected to reflect “exempt” in the AFFMS.  
Accordingly, we recommend her records be corrected to the extent 
indicated below.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that the 
cardio, sit-up, and push-up components of her FA dated 2 Apr 
2012 reflect “exempt” in the AFFMS.

________________________________________________________________



The following members of the Board considered this application 
in Executive Session on 24 Jan 2013, under the provisions of AFI 
36-2603:

     , Panel Chair
     , Member
     , Member

All members voted to correct the record as recommended.  The 
following documentary evidence pertaining to Docket number BC-
2012-02813 was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 12 Jun 2012, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 14 Oct 2012, w/atch.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Oct 2012.




                                   
                                   Panel Chair








Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 02768

    Original file (BC 2012 02768.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This logic also concludes a medical condition causing weight gain would cause an increase in AC. She should have never taken the walk test while her dosage was still being adjusted and the FA should be invalidated based on the solid medical evidence presented. While we note the applicant requests the entire FA dated 25 Apr 2012, be removed, the AF Form 422 reflected that she was cleared to test using AC and she has not provided substantial evidence to persuade us otherwise.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02364

    Original file (BC-2012-02364.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s last five FA scores are as follows: DATE 10 Feb 10 31 Aug 10 * 14 Sep 11 27 Oct 11 2 Feb 12 *Contested FA score. _________________________________________________________________ , Panel Chair , Member , Member THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the cardio and sit-up components of the Fitness Assessment dated 14 Sep 11 be amended to reflect “exempt” in the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01097

    Original file (BC-2012-01097.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Members will be eligible for FA 42 days after the expiration date of physical limitations, as annotated on Air Force (AF) Form 469. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends the cardio component of the applicant’s FA, dated 29 November 2011, be updated to reflect “exempt” in AFFMS. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In accordance with AFI 36-2603,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 01675

    Original file (BC 2012 01675.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was on a profile at the time and should not have tested in certain components. cleared to test on the waist measurement and the 1 mile walk.” _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends disapproval of the applicant’s request to void the FA score; however, they recommend the cardio, push-up and sit-up components of the FA dated 14 Mar 12 be updated to reflect “exempt” in the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01675

    Original file (BC-2012-01675.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was on a profile at the time and should not have tested in certain components. cleared to test on the waist measurement and the 1 mile walk.” _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends disapproval of the applicant’s request to void the FA score; however, they recommend the cardio, push-up and sit-up components of the FA dated 14 Mar 12 be updated to reflect “exempt” in the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05779

    Original file (BC-2012-05779.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A resume of the applicant's FA results is as follows: Date Composite Score Rating *28 Nov 12 38.40 Unsatisfactory 31 May 12 85.90 Satisfactory 13 May 11 93.90 Excellent 23 Nov 10 80.10 Good 5 May 10 79.25 Good 2 Nov 09 85.00 Good * Contested FA The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 1. They...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01210

    Original file (BC-2012-01210.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s commander, by letter dated 14 Mar 12, requests the applicant’s 28 Feb 12 FA score be removed from his records or nullified. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial to remove the applicant’s 28 Feb 12 FA score from the AFFMS. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00307

    Original file (BC-2013-00307.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00307 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 18 Dec 12 Fitness Assessment (FA) score be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). While the Board notes the recommendation from AFPC/DPSIM indicating that it was not until after his FA failure that he became restricted from...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01009

    Original file (BC-2013-01009.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant received an AF Form 469 from his primary medical care provider stating he had a medical condition preventing him from passing the cardio component of the FA effective 18 Nov 2011. Therefore, the applicant should not have been required to complete the cardio portion of the FA. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Oct 2013.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01179

    Original file (BC-2012-01179.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    As of this date, no response has been received by this office. ________________________________________________________________ 2 THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT, be corrected to show that the cardio component of his Fitness Assessment score dated 1 February 2012, be updated to reflect “exempt” in the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ...