Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02923
Original file (BC-2012-02923.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02923 

 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His Re-entry (RE) code of 4E, Ineligible Due to Insufficient 
Grade – Grade is A1C or Below, on his DD Form 214, Certificate 
of Discharge or Release from Active Duty be changed or upgraded 
to 3B, Selective Reenlistment Program Consideration Decision is 
Pending. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

 1. While deployed with the Air Force (AF) Security Forces in 
Afghanistan, he was reprimanded and demoted from the grade of E4 
to E3 for falling asleep on night duty. 

 

 2. Due to the demotion and his being a four-year enlistee he 
fell under the AF 2010 Force Shaping Initiative and was 
administratively separated with an honorable discharge. 

 

 3. He has enlisted in the Army National Guard (ARNG) and has 
been selected for flight school. The ARNG will not waive the 4E 
code but will waive a 3B code and allow him to attend flight 
school. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his 
personal statement, alternate flight aptitude selection test, 
Recommendation for Appointment to Warrant Officer Candidate 
Training/Flight Training letter, and letters of 
support/recommendation. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

According to documents extracted from the Automated Records 
Management System (ARMS) the applicant enlisted in the Regular 
Air Force on 3 October 2006. He was discharged under the DOS 
Rollback Program on 30 June 2010 with an honorable 


characterization of service. He was credited with 3 years, 8 
months, and 28 days of active duty service. 

 

______________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial of the applicant’s request to 
change or upgrade his RE code from 4E to 3B. 

 

 1. The applicant received an Article 15 in Sep 2009 
for sleeping on post while being posted as a sentinel and was 
demoted to the rank of AIC (E-3) with a 9 Sep 2009 Date of Rank 
(DOR). The applicant's RE code was updated to 4E. At the 
time of his Date of Separation (DOS), he was not eligible to 
reenlist and had to separate due to his grade of AI C and time 
in service. 

 

 2. The applicant was demoted based on his own actions. His 
correct RE code is 4E in accordance with chapter 3, of AFI 36-
2606, Reenlistment in the USAF. The Army Nation Guard waived 
the applicant's RE code 4E for reentry. It would be more 
appropriate for the 4E to be waived again and his current 
military time considered than to change the correct RE code. 

 

The complete AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 22 August 2012 for review and comment within 
30 days (Exhibit D). To date, this office has not received a 
response. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice that would 
warrant a change to his RE code. We agree with the opinions and 
recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary 
responsibility that the RE code which was assigned at the time 
of his separation accurately reflects the circumstances of his 
separation; evidence has not been provided that would lead us to 
believe otherwise. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the 


contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the 
relief sought in this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered this application 
BC-2012-02923 in Executive Session on 12 February 2013, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

, Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149 dated 20 June 2012, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 2 August 2012. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 22 August 2012. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00424

    Original file (BC-2013-00424.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Article 15 punishment included a demotion to the grade of airman first class (E-3) with a date of rank of 11 October 2007. His correct RE code is 4E in accordance with Air Force Instruction 36-2601, Reenlistment in the United States Air Force. Every other member of the Air Force that does not meet the appropriate grade for their time in service separates with a 4E or 4D RE code depending on their rank.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05199

    Original file (BC 2013 05199.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was serving in the grade of A1C at the time of his discharge with 31 months or more Time in Service (TIS). As a result, he was not eligible to reenlist and had to separate due to his grade of A1C and TIS. A complete copy of the DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 14 Feb 14 for review and comment within...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02916

    Original file (BC-2012-02916.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02916 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of “4E” (Grade is airman first class or below and airman completed 31 or more months (55 months for a 6- year enlistees), if a first-term airman; or, grade is airman first class or below and the airman is a second-term or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02791

    Original file (BC-2012-02791.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02791 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________ ________________________________________ __________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 4E (Grade is airman first class or below and airman completed 31 or more months (55 months for a 6- year enlistees)), be changed so that he can be eligible to rejoin the military service. ___________...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1997 | BC 1997 03613

    Original file (BC 1997 03613.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. He was demoted to the grade of airman first class (E-3) based on his own decisions and actions and was given an RE code that reflected these...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02884

    Original file (BC-2010-02884.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02884 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 4E (Grade is airman first class or below and airman completed 31 or more months (55 months for 6-year enlistees), if a first-term airman; or, grade is airman first class or below and the airman is a second-term or career...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01916

    Original file (BC-2013-01916.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    If the Board grants his request, he be returned to active duty. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial of his requests to extend his enlistment to make him eligible to reenlist. In the applicant’s case, he would not be eligible for promotion to the grade of SrA until 6 Jun 2016.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01116

    Original file (BC-2012-01116.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 15 March 2011, The Air Force Clemency and Parole Board reviewed the applicant’s case EVALUATION 5B – Promote Ahead of Peers 3B 5B – Promote 4B and approved his return to duty, effective as soon as possible, under the provisions of Air Force Instruction (AFI) 31-205, The Air Force Correction System, paragraph, 11.6. The complete AFPC/DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit C ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In a letter...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04749

    Original file (BC-2012-04749.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. He was discharged for failure in the WMP, which warranted an involuntary discharge with an honorable character of service and an RE code of 2C in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00344

    Original file (BC-2013-00344.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, the applicant provides his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, and bachelor’s degree. The RE code 4E applied to the applicant while on active duty and was appropriate at the time of his separation. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our...