RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02908
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The 2T211, Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) be removed from his
military personnel records.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was not scheduled to attend technical training school, nor
was he given the career development course (CDC), or issued a
government drivers license during the time of his Reserve duty
at Homestead Air Force Base. The 30474 Ground Radio AFSC is the
only AFSC he has held since 1996.
The applicants complete submission, with attachment, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
According to documents extracted from the automated records
management system (ARMS), the applicant enlisted in the
Massachusetts Air National Guard (ANG) on 26 August 1980. Upon
his voluntary relocation to find employment in Florida, he was
transferred to the Inactive Reserves effective 18 November 1994.
Effective 26 September 2008, the applicant was assigned to a
Florida ANG unit and was classified as an Air Transportation
Specialist with the Duty AFSC (DASFC) of 2T251. He subsequently
requested to be reassigned to the Individual Ready Reserve
(IRR), which was made effective on 28 June 2010.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFRC/A1K states in accordance with Air Force Instruction 36-
2101, Classifying Military Personnel (Officer and Enlisted),
paragraph 2.3.2. Air Force personnel in technical training are
awarded the 1-skill level AFSC in the specialty they are
enrolled in at technical training as their Control AFSC (CAFSC).
AFI 36-2101, paragraph 3.3 states, in part, the DAFSC for
enlisted personnel must match the CAFSC unless the enlisted
Airman is on temporary duty (TDY) outside the CAFSC. In the
case of the applicant, the AFSC of 2T211 denotes the 1-skill
level (helper) which identifies personnel initially classified
in an Air Force Specialty when entering the Air Force or when
retraining. The applicant met the conditions as outlined by Air
Force guidance that warranted him being classified as a 2T211.
The complete AFRC/A1K evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 24 September 2012 for review and comment within 30
days (Exhibit D). To date, this office has not received a
response.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After a
thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicants
submission, we believe relief is warranted. The applicant
contends that he was not afforded the required training to
attain a skill level in the 2T2X1 Air Force Specialty Code
(AFSC). We note the comments of the Air Force office of primary
responsibility, indicating the applicant met the conditions as
outlined by Air Force guidance that warranted his being
classified as a 2T211, 1-skill level (helper), because of his
retraining status and therefore, they recommend denial of his
request. Even though it appears there was no error on the part
of the Air Force in effecting the applicants AFSC, we believe
it would be an injustice to require him to continue to carry the
AFSC in light of the fact that he was not provided necessary
training in order to be properly developed in the AFSC. Based
on the above, we recommend that the applicants record be
corrected as indicated below.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on
31 May 2008, he was assigned a control and duty Air Force
Specialty Code of 9A200 - Enlisted Airman Awaiting Discharge,
Separation or Retirement; rather than 2T211 - Air
Transportation.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application
in Executive Session on 5 March 2013, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-02908 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149 dated 26 June 2012, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicants Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFRC/A1K, dated 18 September 2012.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 September 2012.
Panel Chair
AFBCMR
1500 West Perimeter Road, Suite 3700
Joint Base Andrews NAF Washington, MD 20762
Dear:
Your application to the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records, AFBCMR
BC-2012-02908 has been finalized.
The Board determined that the military records should be corrected as set forth in the
attached copy of a Memorandum for the Chief of Staff, United States Air Force. The office
responsible for making the correction will inform you when your records have been changed.
After correction, the records will be reviewed to determine if you are entitled to any
monetary benefits as a result of the correction of records. This determination is made by the
Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS-IN), Indianapolis, Indiana, and involves the
assembly and careful checking of finance records. It may also be necessary for the DFAS-IN to
communicate directly with you to obtain additional information to ensure the proper settlement
of your claim. Because of the number and complexity of claims workload, you should expect
some delay. We assure you, however, that every effort will be made to conclude this matter at
the earliest practical date.
Sincerely,
Chief Examiner
Air Force Board for Correction
of Military Records
2. Attachments:
1. Record of Board Proceedings
2. Directive
cc: DFAS-IN
AFBCMR BC-2012-02908
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for
Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States
Code it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating, be corrected to
show that on 31 May 2008, he was assigned a control and duty Air Force Specialty Code of
9A200 - Enlisted Airman Awaiting Discharge, Separation or Retirement; rather than 2T211 - Air
Transportation.
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
3
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON, DC
Office of the Assistant Secretary
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02811
The commander was told that since the applicant was a ten year First Sergeant who did not hold a 9- skill level she could not remain a CMSgt and that there was not a method for First Sergeants to be promoted to CMSgt. A complete copy of the rebuttal is at Exhibit F. ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicants MILPDS record was reviewed and noted as follows: 16 Jan 03, member last held AFSC 2A671; 17 Jan 03, member was selected into a SDI 8F000 (First Sergeant); 1 Mar 11,...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01496
After his selection for promotion to senior master sergeant it was determined that he should have been considered with a CAFSC of 8F000, First Sergeant and that his selection for promotion was erroneous. In view of the conflicting AFIs governing the effective date for changing the CAFSC upon being selected for retraining and the fact that it is conceivable the applicant may have been at a disadvantage in competing for supplemental promotion because his record was scored against benchmark...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01409
The complete JA evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In his response dated 24 Jun 07, the applicant states supplemental promotion consideration creates two injustices. 1) His records will not be scored by the same promotion board members as the rest of his promotion eligible peers; and 2) under the supplemental promotion process, he will never receive a promotion board score. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01171
The JA evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant's response to the Air Force evaluations is appended at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. In view of the conflicting AFIs governing the effective date for changing the CAFSC upon being selected for retraining and the fact that it is conceivable the applicant may have...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01117
The JA evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant's response to the Air Force evaluations is appended at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. In view of the conflicting AFIs governing the effective date for changing the CAFSC upon being selected for retraining and the fact that it is conceivable the applicant may have...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01315
The JA evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant's response to the Air Force evaluations is appended at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. In view of the conflicting AFIs governing the effective date for changing the CAFSC upon being selected for retraining and the fact that it is conceivable the applicant may have...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01250
The JA evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant's response to the Air Force evaluations, with attachments, is appended at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. In view of the conflicting AFIs governing the effective date for changing the CAFSC upon being selected for retraining and the fact that it is conceivable the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01024
In view of the conflicting AFIs governing the effective date for changing the CAFSC upon being selected for retraining and the fact that it is conceivable the applicant may have been at a disadvantage in competing for supplemental promotion because his record was scored against benchmark records that most likely contained superior performance as actual first sergeants, we believe his promotion to the grade of senior master sergeant in his old CAFSC should be reinstated as an exception to...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01025
In view of the conflicting AFIs governing the effective date for changing the CAFSC upon being selected for retraining and the fact that it is conceivable the applicant may have been at a disadvantage in competing for supplemental promotion because his record was scored against benchmark records that most likely contained superior performance as actual first sergeants, we believe his promotion to the grade of senior master sergeant in his old CAFSC should be reinstated as an exception to...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01061
The JA evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant response to the Air Force evaluations, with attachments, is appended at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. In view of the conflicting AFIs governing the effective date for changing the CAFSC upon being selected for retraining and the fact that it is conceivable the...