Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02808
Original file (BC-2012-02808.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-02808 
COUNSEL:  NONE 
HEARING DESIRED:  NO  

 
 
IN THE MATTER OF: 
 
     
 
   
 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
His  official  records  be  changed  to  show  he  received  a 
Meritorious Service Medal (MSM). 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
He received an MSM upon his retirement.  He requested a copy of 
his records from the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) in 
St. Louis, but did not receive them.  
 
The  applicant’s  complete  submission,  with  attachment,  is  at 
Exhibit A. 
 
_________________ ______________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
The applicant initially entered the Air Force on 15 Jul 58.   
 
On  31  Jan  80,  the  applicant  retired,  and  was  credited  with 
21 years, 6 months, and 16 days of active service.  
 
On  18  Sep  12,  AFPC/DPSOR  notified  the  applicant  that  there  was 
an error on his DD Form 214 concerning his Place of Entry into 
Active  Duty,  and  that  the  error  was  being  administratively 
corrected.   
 
The  MSM  is  awarded  to  any  member  of  the  United  States  Armed 
Forces,  or  to  any  member  of  the  armed  forces  of  a  friendly 
foreign  nation,  who  has  distinguished  himself  or  herself  by 
outstanding meritorious service.   
 
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
described  in  the  letter  prepared  by  the  Air  Force  office  of 
primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C.     
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of 
an  error  or  injustice.    After  a  thorough  review  of  the 
applicant’s  official  military  personnel  record,  we  were  unable 
to verify award of the MSM.  The applicant has been notified of 
the  process  for  requesting  retroactive  recommendations  for 
awards from his Congressional member.  
 
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
A  copy  of  the  Air  Force  evaluation  was  forwarded  to  the 
applicant  on  10  Oct  12  for  review  and  comment  within  30  days.  
As  of  this  date,  no  response  has  been  received  by  this  office 
(Exhibit D). 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The  applicant  has  exhausted  all  remedies  provided  by 
existing law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 
 
3.  Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  an  error  or  injustice.    Although 
the  applicant  contends  that  he  was  awarded  the  MSM  upon  his 
retirement, he provides no documentary evidence, i.e., copies of 
the  special  orders,  certificate,  and  citation,  to  support  this 
contention.  Therefore, in the absence of such evidence, we find 
no  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief  sought  in  the 
application.    
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 
 
The  applicant  be  notified  the  evidence  presented  did  not 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  material  error  or  injustice;  the 
application  was  denied  without  a  personal  appearance;  and  the 
application  will  only  be  reconsidered  upon  the  submission  of 
newly  discovered  relevant  evidence  not  considered  with  this 
application. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
 

 

XXX, Panel Chair 
XXX, Member 
XXX, Member 

The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  AFBCMR  Docket 
Number  BC-2012-02808  in  Executive  Session  on  20  Feb  12,  under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 
 
 
 
 
The following documentary evidence was considered: 
 
   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, 15 Jun 12, w/atchs. 
   Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records 
   Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 4 Sep 12. 
   Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Oct 12. 
 
 
 
 
                                   XXX 
                                   Panel Chair 
                                     
 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03702

    Original file (BC-2012-03702.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His DD Form 214 does not reflect his MSM award. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-00276

    Original file (BC-2012-00276.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force which are attached at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. While the applicant’s records contain documentation indicating that he was awarded the MSM twice (basic award and first OLC), the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03547

    Original file (BC 2013 03547.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03547 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOR recommends granting relief to correct the administrative errors on the reissued DD Form 214, indicating there is evidence of an error or injustice. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02639

    Original file (BC-2012-02639.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. According to the applicant's statement, he was a member of the Air Force Reserve for about 3 years and 3 months. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 14 Feb 2013, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03228

    Original file (BC-2012-03228.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03228 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be credited/awarded for his service in Germany during Operation DESERT SHIELD/DESERT STORM (ODS). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00721

    Original file (BC-2012-00721.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 13 Sep 12, AFPC/DPSOR notified the applicant that IAW AFI 36- 3202, Separation Documents they cannot add the statement “Vietnam Era Veteran” to his DD Form 214; however, his Kuwait Liberation Medal has been amended to read Kuwait Liberation Medal-Kuwait (KLM-K) and will be administratively corrected. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIRP recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change his name in his military personnel...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01290

    Original file (BC-2012-01290.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01290 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _____________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect: 1. AFPC/DPSID will also administratively correct the applicant’s record to reflect the following medals and/or ribbons: 1. In regard to the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00358

    Original file (BC-2013-00358.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The ribbon was awarded to Air Force and Air Force Reserve members credited with completion of an overseas tour on or after 1 Sep 1980. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for award of the Cold War Medal. DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for award of the Air Force Recruiting Ribbon.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02635

    Original file (BC 2013 02635.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicant’s official military service records, are contained in the evaluations provided by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denying the applicant’s request for changing the “Given Under My Hand” date on his MSM for the period 7 August 2005 to 12 August 2010. We took note of the comments and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01934

    Original file (BC-2012-01934.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 10 Oct 06, the applicant received an MSM (2OLC) for retirement for the period 18 Nov 05 through 30 Nov 06. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicant’s request to reinstate the MSM for retirement indicating there is no...