RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02890
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His narrative reason for separation be changed.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The narrative reason for separation he received should read that
he had a mental health condition and/or he was discharged for
the convenience of the government.
In support of his request, the applicant provides an expanded
statement and a copy of correspondence from the Department of
Veterans Affairs (DVA).
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 25 Jul 84, the applicant contracted his enlistment in the
Regular Air Force.
On 8 Jan 86, the applicants commander notified him that he was
recommending his discharge from the Air Force for a pattern of
misconduct conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline.
The reasons for the action was the applicants failure to go to
his appointed place of duty and absent without authority for
which he twice received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under
Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Miltiary Justice (UCMJ).
On 8 Jan 86, he acknowledged receipt of the notification of
discharge and, after consulting with legal counsel, waived his
right to submit a statement in his own behalf.
On 10 Jan 86, the case was found to be legally sufficient and, on
17 Jan 86, the discharge authority directed the applicant be
furnihed a general discharge. On 22 Jan 86, the applicant was
furnihed a general (under honorable conditions) discharge with a
narrative reason for separation of Pattern of Misconduct, along
with a separation program designator (SPD) code of JKM. He was
credited with 1 year, 5 months, and 26 days of total active
service.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of
the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of
an error or injustice. Based on the documentation on file in the
master personnel records, the discharge to include the service
characterization was appropriately administered and within the
discretion of the discharge authority. The applicant did not
provide any evidence that an error or injustice occurred in the
processing of his discharge.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 26 Nov 12 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion
the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find
no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-02890 in Executive Session on 29 Jan 13, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 Jun 12.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 6 Nov 12.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 Nov 12.
Panel Chair
2
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04760
On 5 Feb 86, the applicant was furnished a general (under honorable conditions) discharge with a narrative reason for separation of Misconduct Drug Abuse. He was credited with 4 months and 19 days of total active service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05135
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05135 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Total Active Federal Military Service Date (TAFMSD) be changed from 23 Jan 02 to 2 Jul 01 or in the alternative his TAFMSD be changed back to the original TAFMSD of 30 Sep 01. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04397
On 18 Apr 11, the legal office reviewed the case and found it legally sufficient and recommended discharge with an honorable discharge. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial noting the applicant has not provided any evidence of an error or injustice regarding his RE code. Based on the evidence of record, it appears the applicants honorable discharge for unsatisfactory performance was consistent with the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01691
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01691 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His disability discharge, with severance pay (DWSP), be changed to a retirement. He had completed over 12 years of service at the time of his discharge. In addressing the applicants request for a length of service retirement, in lieu of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03468
His first sergeant attempted to assist him with obtaining a hardship discharge; however, he found out that it could take up to two years. On 28 Nov 2007, he was honorably discharged from the Air Force with a RE code of 2C. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05334
The documentation on file in the master personnel records supports the basis for discharge to include her character of service and narrative reason for separation. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03327
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The documentation on file in the master personnel records supports the basis for discharge. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00970
On 9 Nov 2011, the applicant was notified by his commander that he was not recommending him for reenlistment in the Air Force. Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the applicants discharge to include his separation code was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge instruction and was within the discretion of the discharge authority. The applicant was separated under the Fiscal Year 2012 Enlisted DOS Rollback Program....
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03507
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. PSDM 13- 129, dated 23 Dec 13 (amended 22 Jan 14), states As such, records reviewed by the Retention Boards are considered accurate at the time of review; therefore, will be no process for...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05793
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05793 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The following corrections be made to his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty: 1. The complete DPSIC evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR...