AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03003
The applicant contends that were it not for his injury just prior to his scheduled fitness assessment (FA), he would not have been precluded from participating in all four components of the FA and would have passed the contested FA. However, after a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicants complete submission, including his responses to the Air Force evaluation, 2 we are not convinced that he is the victim of an error or injustice. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03007
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicants military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states he did not receive notice of an open enrollment season. We took notice of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03024
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03024 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ____________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 24 May 2012 Fitness Assessment (FA) score be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ____________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03025
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit B. In this case, the applicant was tested in accordance with his AF Form 422, dated 19 Dec 11, which states he is cleared to test on height, weight, and AC only and is exempt from all other components (start date 14 Dec 11 and end date 12 Apr 12). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03027
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03027 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be paid for his Permanent Change of Station (PCS) to Blytheville, Arkansas as a married member versus single member. The applicant did not file within three years after the alleged error or injustice was discovered as required by Title 10, United...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03029
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03029 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to Honorable. In view of the foregoing, and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we conclude that no basis exists to upgrade the applicants Under Other Than Honorable...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03030
AFPC/DPSID reviewed the applicants records and verified his entitlement to the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and the Air Force Longevity Award. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-03030 in Executive Session on 5 March 2013, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 5 Jul 12, w/atchs. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Aug 12.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03031
JA states that based on the facts presented in the NGB opinions, JA finds their responses to be legally sufficient and concurs with the recommendations to deny the applicant's requests for corrective action related to ACP payments, Board# V0611A, AGR separation from ANG Selective Retention Review Board (SRRB) consideration, and TERA. Counsels complete response is at Exhibit N. _______________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PF...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03035
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03035 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect entitlement to the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon with One Bronze Service Star (SAEMR w/1BSS). The SAEMR is awarded to all Air Force service members who, after 1 Jan 63, qualify as expert in small-arms...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03045
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03045 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date entered Reserve service be changed from 1 May 2012 to 1 October 2011. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/A1K recommends the applicant's military records be corrected to reflect that he...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03046
The applicant applied for Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) in July 2010, but on 16 August 2010 AFPC sent a rejection of his application because he did not sign his Statement of Understanding (SOU). The evidence of record indicates that although the applicant applied for TEB in July 2010, he failed to complete the SOU. As such, we find the evidence sufficient to conclude that it is in the interest of justice to recommend correction of his records as indicated below.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03052
Both documents were published on government-hosted websites prior to 1 Aug 09, the effective date of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. Based on the facts provided, the applicant did not transfer his benefits to his dependents prior to his retirement and he has not provided any evidence that his failure to do so was the result of his being improperly briefed prior to retirement. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03053
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03053 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be upgraded. JAJM states upgrading the applicants BCD is not appropriate and recommends the Board deny the request as untimely or on the merits. ________________________________________________________________ THE...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03057
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03057 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect award of the Bronze Star Medal with Valor (BSM w/V). Based on their review of the applicant's official military personnel record, they were...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03062
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit c. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial, as the decedents record does not contain evidence to support award of the PH. There were no medical documents reflecting that he sustained an injury caused by an enemy and received medical attention for...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03068
By letter dated 31 July 2012, AFPC/DPSIM requested the applicant provide additional supporting documentation to substantiate her claim; specifically, her signed score sheet, signed questionnaire for the FA in question, and a signed memo from the PTLs administering the test stating details of what happened on the date in question (Exhibit B). The complete AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03070
The applicant filed an appeal through the Evaluation Reports Appeals Board (ERAB); however, the ERAB was not convinced the contested report was unjust or inaccurate and her application was denied. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 27 Aug 12 for review and comment within 30 days. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03072
Furthermore, even if there was evidence of an error or injustice with respect to the deceased former members SBP election, the six-year statute of limitations requires a claim for payment of SBP annuities be submitted within six years of the members death. In accordance with Hart v. United States, 910 F.2e 815 (Federal Circuit Court 1990), a claim filed more than six years after the death of a service member is barred by the six year statute of limitations. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03075
The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. The applicant did provide a copy of his AF Form 108, dated 7 Jun 12; however, it has no comments on the preexisting conditions. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicants contentions, we are not persuaded the contested FA is in error or unjust.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03080
After a thorough review of the applicants military record, DPSID could not verify any service in Vietnam or the surrounding airspace during the inclusive period. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03096
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit B. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial since the applicant retired on 31 Jan 09 and the Transfer of Benefits (TEB) did not begin until 1 Aug 09. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03099
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPSIT recommends denial, since the applicant retired in 2007, prior to the 1 Aug 09 effective date of the Post-9/11 GI Bill Program Title 38, Chapter 33, § 3319(f)(1) states an individual may transfer such...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03100
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03100 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect he served in Vietnam and Laos. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission and the available evidence of record in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03105
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03105 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to Honorable. On 17 Mar 86, the applicant was furnished a general (under honorable conditions) discharge and was credited with 4 years, 7 months, and 25 days of total active service. In...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03109
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03109 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Re-entry (RE) code of 2Q (Approved Medical Retirement or Separation) be changed to allow him to reenlist in the service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03117
They state, in part, that based upon the criteria used in 1943 there is no basis for any award. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the Congressman McIntyres office, on behalf of the applicant, via electronic mail (email) on 12 Aug 13 for review and comment within 30 days. Although official documents do reference the co-pilot being wounded, there...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03121
AFBCMR BC-2012-03121 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03122
_______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was told at his retirement briefing that he could transfer his education benefits to his dependents within three years of his retirement. If the Board finds there was an injustice to the extent that the member did not receive adequate pre-separation counseling, as required by law and DoD regulation, and was not personally notified about the need to transfer while serving in the Armed Forces, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03123
AFBCMR BC-2012-03123 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPlICANT be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03124
AFBCMR BC-2012-03124 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT, be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03125
AFBCMR BC-2012-03125 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03126
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03126 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _____________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 26 Apr 12 Fitness Assessment (FA) score be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force,...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03128
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which are at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial and states that there is no evidence that supports the applicants contention that he served in Vietnam during the inclusive dates for these awards. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03135
Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2012-03135 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to , , be corrected to show that he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal (BSM), instead of the Defense Meritorious Service Medal...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03136
On 12 February 2012, the applicant was ordered to active duty for the period 12 February 2012 through 13 March 2012 for the purpose of MEDCON to recover from surgery and physical therapy. His profile and recommendation will be renewed until his condition has resolved adequately or it is determined that a medical evaluation board is required. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03139
On 19 May 08, the applicants commander denied her appeal and on 21 May 08, the appellate authority denied the appeal. A complete copy of the AFLOA/JAJM evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicants request to remove the contested EPRs from her military record, indicating there is a lack of corroborating evidence provided by the applicant. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03145
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 29 Oct 12 for review and comment within 30 days. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03146
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03146 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 13 Mar 12 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). However, the Air Force office of primary responsibility has reviewed this evidence and recommends the record not be disturbed since the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03147
Members pending PCS must have a current FA score on file that will not expire prior to the Report-No-Later- Than-Date (RNLTD) at the next duty location. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: She was requested to provide additional documentation in support of her request; however, during that time she was in training and unable to provide the requested documentation. Therefore, in view of the above and noting her...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03149
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03149 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. However, while his DD Form 214 correctly reflects his rank as technical sergeant, his pay grade is erroneously reflected as E-5, rather than E-6. On 23 August 2012, AFPC/DPSOR notified the applicant that his DD Form 214, would be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03150
AFBCMR BC-2012-03150 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03156
The decedent did not elect to participate during this Open Season. In view of the above, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. You have the right to submit newly discovered relevant evidence for consideration by the Board.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03157
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03157 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The debt established as a result of an erroneous transaction be relieved. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DFAS recommends denial. The applicant claims to have been released from active duty 15 May...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03158
AFBCMR BC-2012-03158 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03159
________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends partial approval by updating the cardio component of the FA dated 13 Jun 12 to reflect exempt in the AFFMS. While the applicant requests that his entire FA dated 13 Jun 12, be removed from his records, we note the AF Form 469 does not exempt him from the abdominal circumference, push-up, and sit-up components of his FA, therefore, these scores should remain as recorded. Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03160
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03160 XXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The official records be corrected to show her deceased spouse transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to her while he was on active duty. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03161
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03161 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to apply to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill education benefits to his dependents. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03170
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03170 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be compensated for pay, points, and applicable benefits for the loss of 30 days of Post Deployment/Mobilization Respite Absence (PDMRA). We note the applicant has requested pay, points, and benefits for the period that he should have been afforded...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03176
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air AFBCMR BC-2012-03176 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03182
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03182 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her fitness assessment (FA) dated 8 June 2012 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The complete AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit...