RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02958
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His character of service be changed from uncharacterized to
honorable.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
1. He was not treated for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
while in the Air Force.
2. He was available to sign his DD Form 214, Certificate of
Release or Discharge from Active Duty; however, he was never
contacted.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 25 May 04, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force.
On 19 Oct 04, the applicant was diagnosed by a clinical
psychologist with an Adjustment Disorder with Depressed Mood and
Personality Disorder, not otherwise specified, with borderline
features, as described in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual
of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV), which was so severe that his
ability to function effectively in the military environment was
significantly impaired.
On 20 Oct 04, the applicant was notified of his commanders
intent to recommend that he be discharged from the Air Force
under the provisions of AFPD 36-32, Air Force Military Training
and AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen, paragraph
5.11.9, Conditions that Interfere with Military Service. The
commander recommended he receive an entry-level separation. The
applicant acknowledged receipt of the notification of discharge.
At that time, the applicant waived his right to seek legal
counsel and to submit a statement in his own behalf.
0n 22 Oct 04, the Deputy Staff Judge Advocate reviewed the case
file and determined it was legally sufficient to support
discharge. On 28 Oct 04, the discharge authority directed the
applicant be discharged from the Air Force with an entry-level
separation. He served five months and seven days of total
active duty.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial. The Medical
Consultant states following the applicants discharge from
inpatient hospitalization, the Intensive Outpatient Program
reported that he put forth minimal effort and made little to no
progress. In fact, he was quoted as saying he did not wish to
remain in the military because of difficulty adapting to the
lifestyle and lack of motivation for treatment.
The applicant reports he suffered PTSD resulting from the tragic
loss of a family member which occurred while he was away at
technical training school. However, throughout the treatment
period both inpatient and ambulatory, the diagnosis of PTSD was
never mentioned. Therefore, the diagnosis of PTSD would have
been improper in this case and that his signs, symptoms and
demonstrated behavior were consistent with an Adjustment
Disorder. It should be noted that an Adjustment Disorder is not
considered a compensable disability under AFI 36-3212, Physical
Evaluation for Retention, Retirement and Separation and
Department of Defense (DoD) 1332.38, Physical Disability
Evaluation.
Additionally, the Medical Consultant recommends the applicants
narrative reason for discharge be changed to reflect the correct
narrative reason Adjustment Disorder.
The complete BCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 14 Jan 13, for review and comment within 30 days
(Exhibit D). As of this date, this office had not received a
response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice to warrant
changing the characterization of his discharge. We are not
persuaded by the evidence presented that the entry-level
separation characterization received by the applicant should be
changed to an honorable discharge. We note the uncharacterized
separation is not an unfavorable reflection upon his military
service nor should it be confused with other types of
separations. Rather, an entry-level separation with
uncharacterized service is used in those cases where the member
has not yet completed six months of service at the time
separation proceedings were, for whatever reason, initiated.
Hence, the uncharacterized separation merely connotes the
brevity of the applicants military service and may not, in and
of itself, be viewed as a defamation of his character.
4. Notwithstanding the above, sufficient relevant evidence has
been presented to demonstrate the existence of an injustice to
warrant changing the narrative reason for his separation to
Adjustment Disorder. We note the applicants records indicate
he was administratively separated under the provisions of AFI
36-3208, with the reason for his discharge being Personality
Disorder. However, after reviewing the evidence of record, it
appears the applicants narrative reason for separation
inaccurately reflects the circumstances surrounding his
discharge. Since the applicant was actually diagnosed with an
Adjustment Disorder with Depressed Mood and Personality
Disorder, the BCMR Medical Consultant recommends his narrative
reason for separation be changed to Adjustment Disorder, along
with the corresponding separation code of JFX. Accordingly,
we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the BCMR Medical
Consultant to change the applicants records to reflect the more
appropriate narrative reason for separation, which more
accurately identifies the circumstances surrounding his
separation. Therefore, we recommend his records be corrected to
the extent indicated below.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was
discharged on 1 Nov 04, with a narrative reason for separation
of Adjustment Disorder, rather than Personality Disorder and
a separation code of JFY, rather than JFX.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-02958 in Executive Session on 19 Mar 13, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-02958 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 19 Jun 12, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated
10 Jan 13.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBC, dated 14 Jan 13.
Panel Chair
4
3
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02648
His records need to be changed to show a different reason for discharge so he can enlist in the Air Force Reserve. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant states that even though the narrative reason for discharge on the applicant’s DD Form 214 is listed as personality disorder, the applicant was not diagnosed with a personality disorder. ROSCOE HINTON JR. Panel Chair AFBCMR 02-02648 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01659
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01659 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation Personality Disorder be changed to medical retirement. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was discharged under medical conditions which should warrant...
Accordingly, they recommend that his separation code and narrative reason for separation be changed to “JFF - Secretarial Authority.” Airmen are given entry level separation/uncharacterized service characterization when separation is initiated in the first 180 days of continuous active service. However, since the governing directives do not provide for a narrative reason of “adjustment disorder,” we recommend that the reason for separation be changed to “Secretarial Authority,” with a...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03541
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03541 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 20 MAY 2006 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason and related codes for his discharge on his separation document (DD 214) be changed from “Personality Disorder” to “Conditions That Interfere With Military Service –...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-03541
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03541 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 20 MAY 2006 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason and related codes for his discharge on his separation document (DD 214) be changed from “Personality Disorder” to “Conditions That Interfere With Military Service –...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03199
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03199 INDEX CODE 100.06 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to “1.” _________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He is of sound mind to rejoin the military and serve his country. Exhibit C....
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00858
On 15 December 2006, the applicant was notified by his commander that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for a mental disorder. As noted by the Separations Branch, at the time of the applicants separation from the Air Force, all members discharged due to a mental disorder fell under a blanket SPD code of JFX with a narrative reason of Personality Disorder. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01660
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01660 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation code (JFX) be changed. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01488
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01488 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be upgraded to 1 and that her uncharacterized entry level separation be changed to an honorable discharge. The BCMR Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPPRS recommends the narrative reason for the...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-00926
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00926 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His uncharacterized discharge be upgraded to honorable. The BCMR Medical Consultants complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of...