AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01860
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01860 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 14 Dec 11, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01862
In support of her request, the applicant provides copies of DD Form 2656-10, Final Decree of Divorce, Domestic Relations Order [Military Retirement], letters from her attorney, letters from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) and numerous other documents in support of her request. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 27 Jul 2012, copies of the Air Force evaluation were forwarded to the applicant and the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01863
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01863 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) option be corrected to establish coverage for another natural person with an insurable interest (NIP) due to the death of her previous beneficiary. In support of her request the applicant submits a...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01864
He agrees that he did not elect SBP coverage during open enrollment because he thought he had full coverage. In an e-mail communication on 15 May 2013, the applicant agrees to pay past premiums in order to be eligible to elect SBP coverage for a future spouse should he remarry. __________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that that...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01867
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01867 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be authorized to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits from one of his dependents to another. For the first time in history, service members enrolled in the Post-9/11 GI Bill Program are able to transfer unused educational benefits...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01868
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01868 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be authorized to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill Education Benefits to his spouse. For the first time in history, service members enrolled in the Post-9/11 GI Bill Program are able to transfer unused educational benefits to their dependent spouses...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01873
Based on a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) report, on 3 Nov 09, the applicant was diagnosed with neurocardiogenic syncope and his case was referred to Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB). On 29 Jun 10, the FPEB agreed with the unfit findings of the IPEB, but found his conditions service aggravated and recommended DWSP, with a combined compensable disability rating of 20 percent, with a 10 percent disability rating assigned to each condition. He understands the disability boards must...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01874
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01874 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of rank (DOR) to lieutenant colonel (Lt Col) be adjusted in accordance with AFI 36-2501, Officer Promotions, Paragraph 4.4 (Special Promotion Issues) and AFI 36-2604, Service Dates and Dates of Rank, paragraph...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01877
AFBCMR BC-2012-01877 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01879
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01879 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date arrived station (DAS) at Maxwell Air Force Base (AFB) be changed from 28 February 2012 to his original DAS of 3 September 2008. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01880
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01880 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be entitled to the Valor device to his previously awarded Bronze Star Medal (BSM). AFCENT contends they have no record of the applicant's request to upgrade BSM for Meritorious Achievement to the BSM w/V for heroism. However, AFCENT contends they...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01881
On 10 Jul 04, the applicant submitted a request to terminate his SBP coverage. There is no evidence DFAS-CL received the termination request. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 1 Jul 04, under the provisions of Title 10 U.S.C, Section 1452, he submitted a valid request to terminate his Survivor Benefit...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01895
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01895 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to an honorable discharge. On 19 January 2010, the Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals remanded the record of trial back to the Judge Advocate General to correct an error in the convening authority’s...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01899
The applicants complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR) which are attached at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AETC/SGPS recommends denial of the applicants request to change his RE code. In accordance with DoD and Air Force guidance on entry-level...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01905
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01905 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason for separation on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Discharge or Release from Active Duty, be changed from adjustment disorder to medical. The complete AFBCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01906
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS HEARING DESIRED: NO DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01906 COUNSEL: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home of Record (HOR) be changed to 2330 Buckboard Trail, Cottonwood, AZ 86326. The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicant’s military service records, are contained in the evaluation by the Air Force office of primary responsibility...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01913
He voluntarily separated from the Air Force and was promised a DOS of 8 Aug 09, based on transferring to The United States Public Health Services (USPHS) as of 9 Aug 09. His separation request reflects a requested DOS of 2 Aug 09, and under MILPDS DATA his DOS is reflected as 8 Aug 3888. On 2 Aug 09, the applicant separated from the Air Force. We cannot comment on the applicants eligibility for HAP as his separation was due to declining an assignment and not because he transferred...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01916
His referral Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) rendered for the period 21 Sep 2010 through 20 Aug 2011, be voided from his records. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits D and E. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicants request to void his referral EPR. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01917
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 18 Feb 82, the applicant and his former spouse were married, and he elected spouse and child SBP coverage based on full retired pay prior to his August 96 retirement. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit B. After a thorough review of the facts and circumstances of this...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01918
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was told at the time of retirement that he was not eligible for SBP due to him and his wife both being military members. Furthermore, there is no evidence the applicant submitted an open enrollment election to provide SBP coverage on his wife’s behalf during any of the opportunities authorized by Public Laws subsequent to his retirement. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01928
As of this date, this office has received no response. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01934
On 10 Oct 06, the applicant received an MSM (2OLC) for retirement for the period 18 Nov 05 through 30 Nov 06. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicants request to reinstate the MSM for retirement indicating there is no...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01946
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reiterates that he spent time in Vietnam with the 428th Tactical Fighter Squadron in 64 and 65, and identifies his commander. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicants complete submission, we believe a preponderance of the evidence indicates the applicant served in the Republic of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01949
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01949 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect award of the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM). Therefore, in the interest of justice, we recommend the applicant’s records be corrected to reflect award of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01950
The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit B. AFPC/DPSID recommends denial stating they were unable to find any evidence that the applicant served in the area of operations or served in the AOE for the required period of time. The complete DPSID evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 28 Aug 12 for review...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01951
On 22 April 1998, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant’s request that his general discharge be upgraded to honorable (Exhibit B). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in the discharge processing. We considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to compel us...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01952
He was given written military orders to report for 29 days temporary duty (TDY) at Cam Rahn Bay Air Base (AB), South Vietnam. DPAPP states a review of the applicant’s master personnel records (MPR) and documentation submitted failed to provide any documents that would substantiate Foreign Service in Vietnam. _________________________________________________________________ 2 , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2012-01952 in...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01954
With that perspective, the commander exercised the discretion that the applicant granted him when the applicant accepted the Article 15 and found nonjudicial punishment appropriate in this case. The applicant’s case has undergone an exhaustive review by the Air Force office of primary responsibility and AFLOA/JAJM; however, other than his own assertions, the applicant has not presented any evidence that the commander abused his discretionary authority in imposing the nonjudicial punishment....
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01955
He assumed his discharge was upgraded until he requested his records on 2 Nov 2011. 2 On or about 5 Sep 1986, he failed to perform quality On or about 16 Oct 1987, he failed to report to work. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to compel us to recommend granting the relief sought on that basis.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01958
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01958 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) recently awarded by the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) be considered by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for the Calendar Year 2011 (CY11D) Major Selection Board. He asks the Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01960
His complete submission is at Exhibit A. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial for awarding the RVCM, stating they were unable to verify the applicant’s service in the area of eligibility for an aggregate of 6 months or that he served outside the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01961
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01961 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. 654, setting forth supplemental policy guidance to services Discharge review Boards and the Board for Correction of Military Records. While the evidence and record supports that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01967
DPSOE states although they cannot determine whether the applicant was actually considered and selected for promotion to SMSgt, they can verify that he would have become ineligible for promotion due to his declination of assignment to Vietnam. The application has not been filed within the three-year time limitation imposed by AFI 36-2603, Air Force Board for 2 Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR). Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01969
In response, the applicant provided a statement indicating that although he is currently incarcerated; he accomplished many honorable and admirable things in his life following his discharge from the Air Force. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in the discharge processing. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01970
The applicant appealed to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) to have his discharge upgraded; however, the AFDRB denied his application. They concluded the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority (see AFDRB Hearing Record at Exhibit B). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01978
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are at Exhibit C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of his request for the RVCM and states that there is insufficient evidence in the applicant’s official military personnel record to support his claim that he served in the area of eligibility for the award....
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01980
AFBCMR BC-2012-01980 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01981
He assumed he would be able to make his election when he retired from the Air Force Reserve. He was told he would be able to make his election up until his retirement of 1 Jun 12. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01983
He retired effective 1 August 2009, but if he had received this information during his attendance at the Transition Assistance Program (TAP), he would have transferred his benefits at that time. We note the comments of the Air Force office of primary responsibility; nonetheless, we find the applicant was not properly briefed on the extension requirements for his entitlement to the benefits of the TEB. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01985
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was not counseled on the requirements to transfer at least one month of education benefits to each dependent prior to his retirement. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01986
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01986 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His fitness assessment (FA) score recorded on 6 April 2012 be adjusted to reflect incomplete in the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01990
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01990 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His home of record (HOR) be changed to reflect an address in Hawaii. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01996
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01996 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His deceased fathers records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal and the Bronze Star Medal (BSM). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we do not find the documentation...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01997
AFBCMR BC-2012-01997 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to XXXXX, be corrected to show that on 2 February 1952, he received an Honorable discharge with a narrative reason for separation of Secretarial Authority, a...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02001
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit B. Further, although the law currently provides automatic coverage for a spouse if the member fails to provide coverage or the spouse does not agree with the decision, no such provisions existed at the time of the member’s eligibility to enroll in the program. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02003
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02003 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. As for her request for a copy of her DD Form 214, AFRC/A1K forwarded a copy of the requested document to the applicant. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02004
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02004 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His fitness assessment, dated 13 March 2011, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). These members then become eligible for fitness assessments 42 days after the expiration of their physical restriction. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02014
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02014 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill education benefits to his dependents. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02016
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02016 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02017
(Already reflected on his DD Form 214) ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His service in Thailand and his AFGCM are not properly reflected on his DD Form 214. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...