Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01860
Original file (BC-2012-01860.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01860 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

Her Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 14 Dec 11, be removed from the 
Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

She popped a rib out of place while doing push-ups and she felt 
increased pain during the sit-up portion of her test. 

 

In support of her request, the applicant submits copies of her AF 
Form 422, Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification 
Status; AF Form 108, Physical Fitness Education and Intervention 
Processing; SF Form 600, Chronological Record of Medical Care and 
Air Force Fitness Management summary. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

Information extracted from the Military Personnel Data Systems 
(MilPDS) indicates the applicant is currently serving in the 
Regular Air Force in the grade of senior airman. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. On 31 May 12, DPSIM requested the 
applicant provide a copy of her fitness assessment score sheet 
and fitness assessment questionnaire. 

 

The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

 


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 28 Aug 12, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this 
date, this office has received no response (Exhibit C). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After 
thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the 
applicant’s contentions, we are not persuaded the contested FA is 
in error or unjust. The AF Form 422, SF Form 108 and SF Form 
600 submitted by the applicant are noted; however, in the absence 
of the fitness assessment score sheet and questionnaire requested 
by AFPC/DPSIM, we find insufficient evidence to warrant 
disturbing the record. However, should the applicant provide 
such evidence, we would be willing to reconsider her request. In 
view of the above and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, 
we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered this application in 
Executive Session on 5 Feb 13, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603: 

 

 Panel Chair 

 Member 

 Member 

 


The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-
2012-01860: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 4 Apr 12, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 15 Aug 12 w/atch. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Aug 12. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02197

    Original file (BC-2012-02197.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Her medical records support her claim she was pregnant at the time of her fitness assessment. After a thorough review of the evidence provided by the applicant, to include the statement from the medical provider, we believe her 21 June 2010 Fitness Assessment score should be removed. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03195

    Original file (BC 2012 03195.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03195 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessments (FAs) dated 30 Sep 11 and 23 Feb 12 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends partial approval,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02896

    Original file (BC-2012-02896.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with (IAW) AFI 36-2905, Air Force Guidance Memorandum on Fitness Program “if an airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have the option of being evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) but his/her test will still count unless rendered invalid by the unit commander.” In this instance it is clear the applicant did not report to the MTF upon completion of her FA due to the elevated heart rate. We...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02827

    Original file (BC-2012-02827.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02827 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 29 December 2011 be removed from his records. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 14 December 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04056

    Original file (BC-2012-04056.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence provided by the applicant did not include medical provider recommended exemptions for the cardio component. If the medical evaluation validates the illness or injury and provides supporting medical documentation, the Unit Commander may invalidate the FA results by notifying the FAC in writing. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02592

    Original file (BC-2012-02592.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2012-02592 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _____________________ _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessments (FAs), dated 9 August 2011 and 7 June 2012, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. We also find no...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02054

    Original file (BC-2012-02054.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03075

    Original file (BC-2012-03075.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. The applicant did provide a copy of his AF Form 108, dated 7 Jun 12; however, it has no comments on the preexisting conditions. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicant’s contentions, we are not persuaded the contested FA is in error or unjust.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01238

    Original file (BC-2012-01238.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03465

    Original file (BC-2012-03465.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03465 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 19 Jun 2012 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 9 Nov 2012, a copy of...