RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01986
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His fitness assessment (FA) score recorded on 6 April 2012 be
adjusted to reflect incomplete in the Air Force Fitness
Management System (AFFMS).
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Through errors made by the Unit Fitness Program Manager (UFPM)
and the Fitness Assessment Cell (FAC), his score of an
incomplete, due to an injury he incurred during the fitness
test, was updated as unsatisfactory. He contacted his UFPM and
FAC and talked with them and his first sergeant. His first
sergeant and commander have provided a memorandum for record
(MFR) stating that his fitness record needs to be corrected.
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his
commanders memorandum for record, his AF Form 469, Duty
Limiting Conditions, a note from his doctor, and his fitness
test history.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in
the grade of Senior Airman (SrA), E-4.
By letter dated 31 May 2012, AFPC/DPSIM requested the applicant
provide additional supporting documentation to substantiate his
claim; specifically, a copy of AF Form 422, Notification of Air
Force Members Qualification Status, indicating his
limitations/exemptions (Exhibit B).
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIM recommends the cardio portion of the fitness
assessment dated 6 April 2012 be updated to reflect exempt in
AFFMS. The applicant provided an AF Form 469, dated
6 April 2012, stating no running >100 yards and no continuous
walking > 3/4 miles. With the exemption of the cardio portion
of the fitness assessment the applicants overall composite
score will change to reflect 94.25 (Excellent).
The complete AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at
Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 1 October 2012 for review and comment within
30 days (Exhibit D). To date, this office has not received a
response.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice to warrant
partial relief. We took notice of the applicant's complete
submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree
with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of
primary responsibility that correction of the cardio portion of
the fitness assessment dated 6 April 2012 reflect exempt in
the Air Force Fitness Management System. We believe correcting
the record in this manner provides the applicant proper and
fitting relief. Accordingly, we recommend that his records be
corrected to the extent indicated below.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show the cardio
portion of the fitness assessment dated 6 April 2012 be amended
to reflect exempt in the Air Force Fitness Management System.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application
BC-2012-01986 in Executive Session on 23 January 2013, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 3 May 2012, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 31 May 2012.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 18 September 2012,
w/atchs.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 October 2012.
Panel Chair
Panel Chair
Member
Member
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02388
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: There was a discrepancy between restrictions placed on his AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, dated 19 Apr 2012 and the testing exemptions reflected on the AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status, dated 20 Apr 2012. On 23 Apr 2012, he took his copy of the AF Form 422 to his scheduled FA. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04770
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04770 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 9 Sep 12 Fitness Assessment (FA) be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The applicants last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 9 Sep 12 37.50 Unsatisfactory 10 Sep...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02951
The applicant provided documentation validating her medical condition including; an AF FM 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report; an AF FM 422 Notification of Air Force Members Qualification Status; a medical evaluation letter signed by her medical provider; and her Enlisted Performance Evaluation (EPR) with a close-out date of 1 Apr 13, which indicates she Meets the fitness standard at the close-out of her report. The applicants last 5 FA results are as follows: Date Composite...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04056
The evidence provided by the applicant did not include medical provider recommended exemptions for the cardio component. If the medical evaluation validates the illness or injury and provides supporting medical documentation, the Unit Commander may invalidate the FA results by notifying the FAC in writing. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03968
The applicants last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 29 Aug 13 95.75 Excellent (Exempt from Cardio) *30 May 13 37.00 Unsatisfactory (0 Points for Cardio) 29 Nov 12 76.30 Satisfactory 5 May 12 84.90 Satisfactory 5 Jan 12 98.50 Excellent (Exempt from Cardio) * Contested FA In accordance with guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905_AFGM5 (3 Jan 13), Attachment 1, Section 10, Paragraph b, If the medical evaluation validates the illness/injury and provides...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02587
In support of his claim, the applicant has submitted a letter from his UFPM and a Standard Form 600, Chronological Record of Medical care, indicating that he had an illness, precluding him from finishing and passing the contested FA and memorandum from his UFPM (not dated) to the Force Support Squadron commander requesting removal of the contested FA from AFFMS. If an AF Form 422 is required, an additional 7 days will be allowed for the AF Form 422 to be generated and provided. A list of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02331
On 2 Jan 14, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis the applicant did not provide sufficient evidence; specifically AF Form 422. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 11 Feb 14, applicant provided a memorandum in rebuttal of AFPC/DPSIM and FAAB memoranda. While we note an...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02580
A list of the applicants complete FA history is as follows: Date Composite Score Cardio Rating 4 Aug 2013 33.00 17:41/0.00 Unsatisfactory *5 May 2013 26.50 INC/0.00 Unsatisfactory 14 May 2012 91.70 12:19/57.60 Satisfactory * Contested FA On 16 Dec 13, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis of Insufficient evidence; specifically AF Form 422 and medical...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02538
For RegAF and AGR Airmen, the FAC (or UFPM where no FAC exists) will enter the FA results in AFFMS on the 6th duty day if the Commander does not invalidate test results or no response from the Commander is received within this timeframe; Atch 1, Para 10a. Commander memorandum, medical docs, or FAC memorandum). ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicants request to remove the contested FA from AFFMS,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03538
On 15 Feb 13, he was given a AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Qualification Status, which incorrectly authorized him to complete push-ups and sit-ups during FA testing, resulting in failure of his 28 Feb 13 FA because he only completed 10 push-ups. The applicant did not provide the Army version of the profile that was given to him, nor did he provide the original profile that should have been dated and signed by the Medical Provider on or about 15 Feb 13. While the Board notes the...