Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01969
Original file (BC-2012-01969.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-01969 
COUNSEL:  NONE 
HEARING DESIRED:  NO 

 
 
                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 
 
IN THE MATTER OF: 
 
   
 
   
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
His  character  of  service  be  changed  from  uncharacterized  to 
general on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge 
from Active Duty. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
During  his  time  in  the  Air  Force  he  served  with  integrity.  
While  at  basic  training,  he  scored  above  average  on  all 
objectives and his training flight earned the accolade of “honor 
flight.”    While  at  technical  training  school,  he  served 
faithfully  and  to  the  best  of  his  abilities  and,  therefore, 
would  like  the  character  of  his  discharge  to  be  upgraded  to 
general.   
 
In support of his request, the applicant submits a copy of his 
DD Form 214.   
 
The  applicant’s  complete  submission,  with  attachment,  is  at 
Exhibit A.  
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
The  applicant  enlisted  in  the  Regular  Air  Force  on 
18 April 1988.   
 
On  18  July  1988  the  commander  notified  him  that  she  was 
recommending  him  for  discharge  from  the  Air  Force  for  entry 
level performance and conduct, under the authority of Air Force 
Regulation  (AFR)  39-10,  Administrative  Separation  of  Airmen, 
paragraph 5-22.  The specific reason for the proposed action was 
the applicant failed to make satisfactory progress in a required 
training  program  as  evidenced  by  his  disenrollment  from  the 
manpower and personnel training course on 8 July 1988.   
 
On  18  July  1988,  the  applicant  acknowledged  receipt  of  the 
commander’s  intent  to  discharge  him  and  waived  his  right  to 
consult counsel or submit statements on his own behalf.   

 

“entry-level 

an 

performance”, 

 
Subsequent  to  the  file  being  found  legally  sufficient  the 
discharge authority approved the recommendation and directed the 
applicant  be  discharged  with  an  entry-level  separation  without 
probation  and  rehabilitation.    The  applicant  was  discharged 
effective  19  July  1988,  with  a  narrative  reason  for  separation 
of 
“uncharacterized” 
characterization of service and was credited with 3 months and 2 
days of active duty service.   
 
Pursuant  to  the  Board’s  request,  the  Federal  Bureau  of 
Investigation  (FBI)  provided  a  copy  of  an  Investigative  Report 
which is at Exhibit C.   
 
On 19 September 2012, a copy of the FBI Investigative report was 
forwarded to the applicant along with a request for post service 
documentation for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D).   
 
In  response,  the  applicant  provided  a  statement  indicating  that 
although  he  is  currently  incarcerated;  he  accomplished  many 
honorable  and  admirable  things  in  his  life  following  his 
discharge  from  the  Air  Force.    His  first  and  most  important 
achievement  was  the  birth  of  his  daughter  who  is  currently  in 
training to be a medic and hopes to become a surgeon.  He put all 
his energy into supporting his family by working various jobs and 
following  the  American  dream  of  buying  a  home.    He  served  as 
president  of  the  PTA  at  his  daughter’s  elementary  school  while 
also earning a certificate of completion in a statistical process 
control course at a local community college.  In the years after 
his  marriage  he  worked  for  four  organizations  including  the 
American  Red  Cross  and  consistently  worked  toward  bettering 
himself and his situation for his family’s sake.    
 
Aside from his current and slight detour in his life, for which 
he  is  unquestionably  remorseful,  he  has  tried  to  do  the  right 
thing.    It  is  for  this  reason  that  he  is  applying  for  clemency 
and an upgrade of his character of discharge from the Air Force.    
 
The  applicant’s  complete  response,  with  attachments,  is  at 
Exhibit D. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The  applicant  has  exhausted  all  remedies  provided  by 
existing law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.   
 
3.  Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 

 
 

 

of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice 
that  occurred  in  the  discharge  processing.    Based  on  the 
available  evidence  of  record,  it  appears  the  discharge  was 
consistent  with  the  substantive  requirements  of  the  discharge 
regulation  and  within  the  commander's  discretionary  authority.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary we find no 
basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief  sought  in  this 
application. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 
 
The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  material  error  or  injustice;  that 
the  application  was  denied  without  a  personal  appearance;  and 
that  the  application  will  only  be  reconsidered  upon  the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  this  application 
BC-2012-01969  in  Executive  Session  on  27  November  2012,  under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 
 
 
 
The following documentary evidence was considered: 
 
 Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 25 April 2012, w/atchs. 
 Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 
 Exhibit C.  FBI Report. 
 Exhibit D.  Letter, AFBCMR, dated 19 September 2012. 
 Exhibit E.  Letter, Applicant, dated 25 September 2012, w/atch. 
 
 
 
 
                                  
                                 Panel Chair 

, Panel Chair 
, Member 
, Member 

 
 

 
 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00297

    Original file (BC-2012-00297.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00297 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His uncharacterized service be changed to an honorable discharge. The applicant was notified by his commander of his intent to recommend that he be discharged from the Air Force under the provisions of AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208. The applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2005-02810

    Original file (BC-2005-02810.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    His records be corrected to reflect entitlement to the Combat Readiness Medal (CRM) and the Basic Military Training Honor Graduate Ribbon (BMTHGR). He is determined to pursue a military career with the ARNG, and would like to demonstrate to them that his service in the USAF was ultimately considered honorable. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicant’s request for award of the CRM and BMTHGR.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0100838

    Original file (0100838.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 29 Jun 95, applicant was notified that his commander was recommending that he be discharged from the Air Force for fraudulent entry. The Board requested applicant provide additional evidence pertaining to his post-service activities (Exhibit G). We note the letters of recommendation provided from applicant’s Military Personnel Records from 1995.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03185

    Original file (BC-2010-03185.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03185 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. It has been 27 years since his discharge and not a day goes by that he does not think about how his time in the service would have been different had he been more mature,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02180

    Original file (BC-2012-02180.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The specific reasons for this action were: On or about 1 Feb 1979, he failed to go to his appointed place of duty in violation of Article 86, for which he received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR). In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to compel us to recommend granting the relief sought 2 on that basis. Exhibit C. FBI Report, dated 29 June 2012.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04837

    Original file (BC-2011-04837.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04837 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to honorable. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02371

    Original file (BC-2007-02371.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    At the time of the applicant’s discharge, the service characterization received was appropriate under the provisions of the governing regulation in effect at the time. Additionally, notwithstanding the absence of error or injustice, the Board has the prerogative to grant relief on the basis of clemency if so inclined. Exhibit E. AFI 36-3208 Extracts, dated 9 Jul 04.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02372

    Original file (BC-2011-02372.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02372 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 28 Nov 89, the applicant was discharged and received a general discharge. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00271

    Original file (BC-2012-00271.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00271 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her character of service on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed from Uncharacterized to Honorable. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) provided a copy of an...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 01163

    Original file (BC 2012 01163.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01163 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) characterization of discharge be upgraded to honorable. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. Exhibit C. FBI Report Exhibit D....