AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
HEARING DESIRED: NO
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01906
COUNSEL: NO
IN THE MATTER OF:
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Home of Record (HOR) be changed to 2330 Buckboard Trail,
Cottonwood, AZ 86326.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The address on his initial enlistment documents is incorrect.
The applicant does not provide any evidence in support of his
appeal.
The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in
the grade of technical sergeant (E-6).
The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicant’s
military service records, are contained in the evaluation by the
Air Force office of primary responsibility at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial. DPSIPE states there is no error
or justification that warrants a change in the applicant’s HOR.
The applicant’s record reflects 812 North 6th Street, Unit B,
Cottonwood, AZ 86326 as the HOR at which he lived prior to
entering the Air Force. This address is listed as the
applicant’s HOR on his DD Form 4, Enlistment/Reenlistment
Document Armed Forces of the United States, dated 14 May 2002,
which according to Air Force Instruction 36-3208, Table A2.1,
Item 5, is the source document for HOR. The same address is
listed as the applicant’s current address at the time of
enlistment on his DD Form 1966, Record of Military Processing-
Armed Forces of the United States, dated 10 January 2002. The
Joint Federal Travel Regulations (JFTR) for Uniformed Service
Members, Appendix A, states that the HOR is the place recorded as
the home of the individual when commissioned, appointed,
enlisted, inducted, or ordered into a tour of active duty.
The complete DPSIPE evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 18 June 2012, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit
D). As of this date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice. We took
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-01906 in Executive Session on 6 December 2012,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
2
The following documentary evidence was considered in connection
with AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-01906:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 16 Apr 12, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIPE, dated 4 Jun 12.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 Jun 12.
Panel Chair
3
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02240
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02480 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home of Record (HOR) be changed from XXXXXXX, Arizona (AZ) to XXXXXXX, Massachusetts (MA). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03485
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03485 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His home of record (HOR) be changed from Sun City, Arizona (AZ) to Lake Arrowhead, California (CA). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04298
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04298 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed from Tucson, Arizona to Navarre, Florida. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is attached at...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03581
According to item 7(b) of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, his home of record at time of entry reflects Glendale (Maricopa), AZ. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial, indicating there is no...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02975
A review of the applicants military personnel records failed to substantiate an error or injustice to warrant changing his HOR. The complete DPSIPE evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy Of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 23 Dec 14, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02679
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02679 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed from Dayton, Ohio to Fremont, California. Her complete submission is at Exhibit A. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02033
The applicants enlistment documents reflect her HOR as Triangle, Virginia. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicants HOR is listed throughout her military records as...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04693
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04693 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home of Record (HOR) be changed from West Virginia to Germany. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is attached at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 02520
In addition, Southaven, MS is consistently listed throughout his records as his HOR. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02297
His DD Form 4/1, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States, reflects Mariposa, California as his home of record at the time of his enlistment. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial. The applicant’s records reflect Mariposa, California as the state he lived in prior to entering the Air Force.