AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02018
If the Board determines otherwise, he is able to provide whatever evidence is deemed necessary. The applicant did not provide any documents in support of his request. In this respect, the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) has indicated that through no fault of the applicant it appears he may not have been afforded the opportunity to transfer his benefits to his dependents.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02029
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02029 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His second deferral for promotion to the grade of major (O-4) be vacated and he receive promotion consideration by a Special Selection Board (SSB). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02031
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02031 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reason for separation (Fraudulent Entry in Military Service) and Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of JDA be changed to reflect a medical discharge. On 27 Jun 11, the applicant received an uncharacterized entry- level separation, by...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02033
The applicants enlistment documents reflect her HOR as Triangle, Virginia. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicants HOR is listed throughout her military records as...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02034
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of the applicants request for entitlement to the KDSM and the NATO Medal-Yugoslavia. However, in regards to the applicants request for entitlement to the NATO Medal-Yugoslavia, we find no evidence that he has ever...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02036
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02036 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 4 Jan 1989, the applicant was discharged from the Air Force, with service characterized as general (under honorable conditions). In the interest of justice, we considered...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02038
The VSM is awarded to all members of the United States Armed Forces serving at any time between 4 Jul 1965 and 28 Mar 1973, in the area of eligibility. In addition, the applicant served in Korea for one day and therefore does not meet the basic award criteria for the AFEM as he did not serve for 30 consecutive or 60 non-consecutive days. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2012-02038 in Executive...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02040
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02040 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code 2C, which denotes "Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service," be changed to an RE code of 1 to allow reentry in the military. On 15 Sep...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02042
An addendum be added to the Accident Investigation Board (AIB) Report, Safety Investigation Board (SIB) Report, and the 459 AW/CC-directed Report of Investigation (ROI) and all documents regarding the incident, indicating that he was completely exonerated by the Oct 97 Flight Evaluation Board (FEB). On 8 Oct 97, an FEB (FEB #1) convened to review the case. In response to AFRC/JAs comment that, The position with USAFA was a second chance for the applicant and his Air Force career.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02054
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02055
Since the applicant did not obtain a position, or take an oath of office to accept the commission, and her military service obligation expired, she was discharged from the Air Force. Therefore, the applicants break in service was the result of her being discharged due her military service obligation and no Oath of Office being administered for the Air Force Reserve ARPC/DPA complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02068
His narrative reason for separation, “Fraudulent Entry into Military Service,” be changed. DPSOA states the RE code 2C is required based on the entry level separation with uncharacterized character of service and the applicant does not provide any evidence of an error or injustice in reference to his RE code The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. 2 ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 7 Aug 2012, copies of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02078
On 24 January 2009, the applicants commander offered him nonjudicial punishment proceedings (NJP) under Article 15 UCMJ for one specification of a violation of Article 111. The commander, at the time of the Article 15, had the best opportunity to evaluate the evidence in the case, as evidenced in this case. The applicant, in this appeal, has provided none of these documents and only states in his request that he wishes a new PRF be accomplished.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02082
His Nurse Enlisted Commissioning Program (NECP) scholarship be reinstated. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits B, C and D. 2 ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAMN recommends denial of the applicant’s requests to have his NECP scholarship reinstated and that his DD...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02083
In support of his request, the applicant provided copies of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, DVA rating/decision letter, evaluation boards findings, and MEB summary and medical records. The fact that a person may have a medical condition does not mean that the condition is unfitting for continued military service. The complete AFPC/DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02087
On 24 February 2012, the applicant received notification from the unit wing commander that he was recommending her for demotion to the grade of E-4, Senior Airman. Their interpretation of the instruction is the unit commander may recommend demotion of an enlisted ANG member under his/her command. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application BC-2012-02087 in Executive Session on 23 January 2013, under...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02088
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02089
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states that her husbands original copy of the RCSBP letter was with his important paperwork and was never signed. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02092
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02092 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His retirement date be changed to 1 Jun 12 rather than 1 Jun 11. We note the comments of the Air Force office of primary responsibility indicating that even though he was not credited for all of his reserve service until six months after his...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02099
She was discharged from the Air Force because she failed training and the Air Force would not reclassify her. Her commander initiated separation action on 11 Mar 2010, which gave her 178 days active duty at the time her separation action was initiated. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC- 2012-02099 in Executive Session on 20 Dec 2012, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02101
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02101 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of “2C” which denotes “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry-level separation without characterization” be changed to a “1” to allow him to reenlist in the Armed Forces. On 10 Jun 11, the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02110
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial, stating, in part, that based on a review of the applicant's military personnel record and provided documentation; he did not serve in the Areas of Eligibility (AOE) for award of the AFEM. Service members must have been permanently assigned, attached, or detailed to a unit that participated in or engaged in direct support of the operation for 30 consecutive days in a...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02113
The base legal office reviewed the case and found it legally sufficient to support separation and recommended that he receive a general discharge without probation and rehabilitation. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to compel us to recommend granting the relief sought on that basis. Exhibit C. FBI Report of Investigation, dated 6 Jun 12.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02115
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: When she was on active duty she was young and dumb and did not respect her position and assignments as she should have. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, there was no evidence submitted to compel us to recommend granting the relief sought on that basis. Exhibit C. Letter, AFBCMR dated 3 December 2012.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02116
The applicant contends he is innocent of the charges preferred and asserts that, by deductive reasoning, he has identified who the confidential informant must have been, and that individual now recants any statement he may have made to the Air Force Office of Special Investigation regarding whether the applicant every smoked Spice in his presence. A complete copy of the AFLOA/JAJM evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicants request to have his referral EPR...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02117
Based on the Board's decision, there were three possible results: they would be retained in the service, discharged with an honorable or general characterization, or discharged with an undesirable characterization. The complete JA evaluation is at Exhibit B. AFPC/DPSOA states although not requested, their office addresses Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) codes in cases involving separation under Don't Ask, Don't Tell (DADT) or similar policy. If it is determined a RE code should have been...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02121
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02121 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reinstated as an F-16 pilot in the Oklahoma Air National Guard, effective 9 Jan 12. (3) In the judgment of the flight examiner, a Q2 may be given if there is justification based on Q- performance in one or several areas/subareas), requiring him...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02123
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02123 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC). The DFC is awarded to any officer or enlisted person of the Armed Forces of the United States who shall have distinguished her or himself in actual combat in support of operations...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02127
On 15 September 1986, he was released from active duty with an honorable characterization of service and credited with completing 3 years, 11 months, and 23 days of active duty service. However, they believe the applicant is requesting award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) for service in support of operations in Grenada. He states his unit was awarded the AFEM but he was told he could not receive the medal because he did not have two years of service and would receive the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02128
We note the applicant has not submitted documentation pertaining to his post- service activities; therefore, we do not find it in the interest of justice to exercise clemency in this case. However, should he provide information documenting his post-service activities, we may be inclined to reconsider his request based on clemency. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02132
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02132 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her uncharacterized service, as reflected on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed. Airmen are given entry-level separation with uncharacterized service when separation is initiated in the first 180 days...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02136
While you may revoke your transfer at any time, a revocation DOES NOT automatically cancel the associated ADSC, even if benefits have not been used; (2) AFPC WILL NOT prorate ADSCs for members who have used any part of their VA educational benefits." ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant notes he is aware revoking his TEB does not necessarily relieve him of the ADSC incurred by the TEB. Exhibit C....
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02140
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02140 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corps (AFROTC) debt that he incurred as a result of his disenrollment be cancelled. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: According to the Air Force office of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02142
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02142 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His official records be corrected to show he is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB). For the first time in history, service members enrolled in the Post-9/11 GI Bill Program are able to transfer unused...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02146
He made every attempt to work with his assigned ANG unit to receive the required points, but was informed that he would not be able to conduct any drill days because he didnt display a commitment and clear understanding of how he wanted to proceed as a member of the ANG. The POC of the previous unit notified the applicant that the unit commander inquired and found no slanderous comments made about the applicant between the two units. Leadership noted that ADLS was not required at the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02147
________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends approval, noting the applicants record should be amended to reflect, as a minimum, the applicant was placed on active duty orders for pay and points on 5 Mar 11 and remained so until his medical retirement effective 29 Aug 12. The applicants request is duly noted; however, we did not find the evidence provided substantial enough to override the opinions...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02149
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The record should be changed because it was created through an administrative error by the finance office and through no fault of her own. The Air Force Financial Services Center Debts and Remissions Branch directed the collection rate of $350.00 per month for seven months until the member's current expired term of service (ETS) date of 20 Nov 2012. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02152
Therefore, the applicant’s home of record is the Boston Georgia address. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. , Chair , Member , Member ________________________________________________________________ The...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02157
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02157 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation be changed from adjustment disorder to medically retired. On 21 May 2009, she was notified of her commanders intent to discharge her from the Air Force for Conditions that Interfere with Military Service: Mental...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02159
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02159 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 11 Jun 1984, the applicant was discharged from the Air Force, with a general discharge. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02160
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02160 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded to Honorable. While the applicant contends her two years of service merit an honorable discharge, we find no evidence or an error or injustice that occurred in the discharge process. It...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02165
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02165 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Entry Level Separation (ELS) with uncharacterized service for Erroneous Entry be upgraded to an Honorable discharge. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial indicating...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02167-1
On 20 Jul 12, the Purple Heart Review Board (PHRB) considered the applicant’s request to be awarded the PH; however, they disapproved the request. After a thorough review of the available evidence and applicant’s complete submission, we find no evidence that his records should be corrected to show he was awarded the PH. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-02167 in Executive Session on...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02171
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02171 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Narrative Reason for Separation of Failed to Meet Physical Standards for Enlistment be removed from his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02174
In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of a Medical Provider Form, VA Form 10-5345, Request and Authorization to Release Medical Records or Health Information; AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Members Qualification Status, and extracts from his medical records. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 17 Sep 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02176
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02176 COUNSEL: __________________ __________________________ HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to undergo a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) anddisability processing for a history of recurrent cerebral vascular accidents. While serving on an active duty tour from 4 April 2010 through30 September 2010, the applicant was admitted to a local hospitalwith a...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02179
________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Based on the available evidence of record and the letter provided by the Air Force Medical Operations Agency (AFMOA), the applicant was recalled to EAD during the period of 27 Aug 10 to 24 Feb 11. The applicant was approved for INCAP pay; documents show a start date of 11 Jun 11 through 21 Aug 11. The requirement for MEDCON orders, at the time he was requesting an extension of his orders, is that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02179-2
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00124 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded a ten percent increase in his retired pay as a result of receiving the Airmans Medal (AmnM) for heroism. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants request, and, the rationale of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02180
The specific reasons for this action were: On or about 1 Feb 1979, he failed to go to his appointed place of duty in violation of Article 86, for which he received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR). In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to compel us to recommend granting the relief sought 2 on that basis. Exhibit C. FBI Report, dated 29 June 2012.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02186
On 19 Sep 1957, the applicant was discharged from the Air Force, with a general discharge. On 31 Oct 2012, a copy of the FBI report was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D); as of this date, no response has been received by this office. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, based on the contents of his FBI Report we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to compel us to recommend...