Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01981
Original file (BC-2012-01981.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01981
		COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be given an opportunity to change his Reserve Component 
Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) election.

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His wife signed for the 20-year packet, but he never received 
the RCSBP packet and was never given an opportunity to make an 
election.  

He assumed he would be able to make his election when he retired 
from the Air Force Reserve.  He was told he would be able to 
make his election up until his retirement of 1 Jun 12.

His file shows no election was made, and therefore went to a 
default election.  

The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________
_

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant transferred to the Retired Reserves on 31 Dec 98, 
in the grade of Lt Col.

The remaining facts are contained in the opinion prepared by the 
appropriate office of primary responsibility at Exhibit B.

________________________________________________________________
_

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

ARPC/DPTT recommends denial.  DPTT states that by law, the 
member was notified of his opportunity to make an RCSBP election 
on 25 Aug 05, via certified mail.  The election package was sent 
and certified as received on 18 Jun 06.  He made no election 
during that time and as prescribed by Title 10, United States 
Code (10 USC) Section 1448, was automatically enrolled in Option 
C (Immediate Annuity for Spouse Only) effective 13 Sep 06.

The complete DPTT evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B.

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 19 Jun 12, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded 
to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days.  As of 
this date, a response has not been received by this office 
(Exhibit D).

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has 
not been the victim of an error or injustice.  Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.

________________________________________________________________
_

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number    
BC-2012-01981 in Executive Session on 19 Dec 12, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	  Panel Chair
	  Member
	  Member

The following documentary evidence pertaining to Docket Number 
BC-2012-01981 was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 11 May 12.
    Exhibit B.  Letter, ARPC/DPTT, dated 12 Jun 12, w/atchs.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Jun 12.



								
								Panel Chair
2


3


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02089

    Original file (BC-2012-02089.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states that her husband’s original copy of the RCSBP letter was with his important paperwork and was never signed. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00175

    Original file (BC-2012-00175.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial noting the service member failed to elect to participate in RCSBP. The service member did not submit an application to transfer to the Retired Reserve within the required time period and was discharged effective 21 Sep 09. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04782

    Original file (BC-2012-04782.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He did not understand the process or requirements for making a RCSBP election. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial, indicating there is no...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05162

    Original file (BC 2012 05162.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A complete copy of the ARPC/DPTT evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Her spouse signed for the notification letter for RCSBP because she was serving her annual tour in Germany. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02001

    Original file (BC-2012-02001.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit B. Further, although the law currently provides automatic coverage for a spouse if the member fails to provide coverage or the spouse does not agree with the decision, no such provisions existed at the time of the member’s eligibility to enroll in the program. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05676

    Original file (BC 2012 05676.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The complete DPTT evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01698

    Original file (BC 2014 01698.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01698 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He should be reimbursed for any charges he incurred for RCSBP because the ARPC Form 123, RCSBP Election Certificate, showing that he opted out of the RCSBP was submitted within the required 90-day time period prescribed by Title 10 USC, subsection 1448 (a) (2) (B). A complete copy of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05247

    Original file (BC 2012 05247.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Option A (Decline to make an election until age 60) – the service member declines to make an election at the time of eligibility; however, the service member is provided an opportunity to participate in SBP at age 60. b. Option B (Deferred Annuity) the service member elects RCSBP coverage to begin at age 60. c. Option C (Immediate Annuity) the service member elects for coverage to begin immediately. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00640

    Original file (BC-2012-00640.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00640 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to show that he elected Option C (Immediate Annuity), under the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP), for spouse and child coverage, based on full retired pay. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00623

    Original file (BC-2011-00623.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He loved his country and was dedicated to his job as an Air Force officer. If the member would have made an election, the election would have been effective on his 60th birthday. She retired after 20 years as a teacher; however a teacher’s retirement pay is not much.