Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01946
Original file (BC-2012-01946.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01946 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His official records be corrected to: 

 

1. Show his service in Da Nang, Republic of Vietnam. 

 

2. Update his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States 
Report of Transfer or Discharge, with appropriate Vietnam 
Campaign Awards. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He served in Vietnam with the 428th Tactical Fighter Squadron 
from 1964 to 1965. 

 

In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a copy of his 
DD Form 214. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant initially entered the Air Force on 8 Jun 61, 
received an honorable discharge certificate on 7 Jun 65, and was 
credited with four years of active service, which included one 
year and four months of foreign service. 

 

While assigned to the 474th Organizational Maintenance Squadron, 
Cannon Air Force Base, New Mexico, the applicant received an 
Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) for the period 8 Jun 64 
through 7 Jun 65, which contains the comment, “He also performs 
well on TDY’s under difficult situations such as the most recent 
TDY to Southeast Asia.” 

 

 


The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of 
primary responsibility which are included at Exhibits C and D. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial indicating that there is no 
evidence of an error or injustice. Unfortunately, the 
applicant’s DD Form 214 does not provide the exact locations or 
dates of his foreign service to substantiate his claim of 
service in the Republic of Vietnam. 

 

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating that there is no 
evidence of an error or injustice. Award of service and 
campaign medals is based on the location and length of service 
in the areas of operation for each distinctive campaign award. 
The applicant’s DD Form 214 reflects award of the Armed Forces 
Expeditionary Medal (AFEM). This is an appropriate award for 
service in Vietnam. The Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) was not 
awarded during the dates of the applicant’s TDY. It could not 
be determined if the applicant is eligible for award of the 
Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal or the Republic of Vietnam 
Gallantry Cross with Palm without specific dates and locations. 

 

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit D. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

The applicant reiterates that he spent time in Vietnam with the 
428th Tactical Fighter Squadron in 64 and 65, and identifies his 
commander. He provides two “eye witness” letters, from a 
retired Chief Master Sergeant and retired Master Sergeant 
respectively, both of whom attest to the fact they served with 
the applicant in Vietnam as he contends. In addition, he 
provides copies of letters from the Commander of the 428th 
Tactical Fighter Squadron, the Commander of the 428th Tactical 
Fighter Wing, and the 747th Tactical Fight Wing Deputy Commander 
for Material, each commending the applicant for his outstanding 
performance with the 428th Tactical Fighter Squadron on Operation 
One Buck Five. In addition, the applicant provides a picture 
which he states shows him in Vietnam with the two individuals 
who provided the eye-witness letters, a recent newspaper article 
about his service in Vietnam, and copies of Vietnamese money, 
historical newspaper articles, and a Christmas Day Dinner Menu 
from the Air Force Dining Hall at Da Nang, Vietnam (Exhibit F). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. The 
applicant contends he served in Vietnam and his DD Form 214 
should be corrected to reflect said service. After a thorough 
review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s complete 
submission, we believe a preponderance of the evidence indicates 
the applicant served in the Republic of Vietnam. In this 
respect, we note the applicant has provided evidence indicating 
he was involved in Operation One Buck Five as a member of the 
428th Tactical Fighter Squadron, and the 428th Tactical Fighter 
Squadron was in Vietnam for Operation One Buck Five from 
24 Nov 64 to 13 Mar 65. Therefore, we believe it is in the 
interest of justice to resolve any doubt in this matter in the 
applicant’s favor and recommend his record be corrected as 
indicated below. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that he had 
boots on the ground in the Republic of Vietnam from 24 Nov 64 to 
13 Mar 65. 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-01946 in Executive Session on 9 Jan 13, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 Panel Chair 

 Member 

 Member 

 

 


All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The 
following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-01946 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 13 Jan 12, w/atch. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 10 Jul 12. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 11 Aug 12. 

 Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Aug 12. 

 Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, undated, w/atchs. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00408

    Original file (BC 2014 00408.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit E. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He served for a little less than four years because of hazardous missions flown in SEA. While the applicant has not provided conclusive evidence that he completed a TDY to Vietnam, it is our opinion the APR for the period ending 27 Sep 68 coupled with AFPS’s database appear to weigh more in favor of amending the applicant’s DD Form 214 to reflect award of the VSM with one Bronze Service Star...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02058

    Original file (BC-2011-02058.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His AF Form 7, Airman Military Record, Item 2, Foreign Service Summary be corrected to reflect Da Nang AB, South Vietnam. DPAPP states that based upon review of the applicant’s military records and the documentation provided they were unable to verify Foreign Service time in Vietnam. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show his race...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00536

    Original file (BC 2013 00536.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He has documentation from a fellow service member who served in Vietnam with him who experienced a similar problem regarding his service in Vietnam, and how his records were corrected by the Air Force. Therefore, we recommend that his records be corrected as indicated below. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01746

    Original file (BC-2012-01746.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01746 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge be corrected to reflect entitlement to the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The applicant served in units during their award periods for the RVNGC w/P, which would imply...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02385

    Original file (BC 2014 02385.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02385 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. His DD 214 was administratively corrected to reflect seven months and nine days of foreign service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03108

    Original file (BC 2014 03108.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on his dates in Vietnam, DPSID was able to verify he is authorized two Bronze Service Stars (BSS) to the VSM for his participation in the Vietnam Defensive Campaign and Vietnam Air Campaign. Campaign streamers are embroidered swallow-tailed ribbons of the same design as campaign or service medals awarded to members for service in a named campaign. Based on review of the applicant’s official military personnel record, DPSID was able to determine that the below Air Force Medals and/or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01385

    Original file (BC-2012-01385.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility which are included at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends approval, indicating there is evidence of an error or injustice. The applicant’s DD Form 214 accurately reflects his Foreign Service Credit for his assignment to Clark Air Base but does not show...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03274

    Original file (BC-2012-03274.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03274 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect entitlement to the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03890

    Original file (BC-2012-03890.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03890 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect he was awarded the following: a. Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served in Guam with the 3960th Strategic Wing for 176...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04896

    Original file (BC 2013 04896.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s AF Form 11, Officer Military Record, reflects foreign service from 28 Jan 68 to 1 July 68 for 155 days. While the applicant has not provided conclusive evidence of the exact length of time he was in Korea, it is our opinion that the available evidence appears to weigh more in favor of amending the applicant’s DD Form 214 to reflect his foreign service as requested. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to...