AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2003-02532
The previous directive clearly states that any nonselections for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel, in-the-primary zone, prior to the applicant receiving a minimum of two OPRs with at least 250 days of supervision, in the grade of major, will be set aside. Counsel further contends that the only appropriate corrective action to be taken in this case is to directly promote the applicant to the grade of lieutenant colonel. In previous consideration of this case it was directed that...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2003-02926-2
They stated, in part, that they believe the applicant’s father was in fact lawfully married to his wife, ----- --------, and the payment of the death gratuity to his wife, ------, was proper. Since ----- ------ identified ------ as his wife on his enlistment paperwork in 1947, two years later, they can safely assume he did in fact hold out --------- to be his wife, and that they lived together as husband and wife. Exhibit H. Letter, HQ USAF/JAA, dated 7 Dec 05, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2003-03436-3
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s request, and, the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit G. In early February 2006, the applicant submitted an application asking that the Board reconsider her request and restore eight and one half days of leave that DFAS had paid her for (Exhibit I). In this case, we do not find the additional evidence she provided to be of such significance as to cause us to...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2003-03546
SECOND ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03546 INDEX CODE: 112.00, 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Management Level Evaluation Board (MLEB) president has provided a letter requesting the contested Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) be declared void and removed from the applicant’s records and...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2003-03798-2
On 29 April 2004, the Board considered and denied applicant’s request that his records be corrected to show that his medical problems were the cause of his discharge. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s separation, and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit F. The applicant has provided additional evidence through his Congressman’s office and requests that the Board reconsider his application. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2003-03990A
On 12 Apr 04, the Board considered and denied a similar appeal submitted by the applicant. The applicant was sentenced to a bad conduct discharge as the result of a court-martial and it appears his corrected DD Form 214 accurately reflects the reason for his discharge and the characterization of his service. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis upon which to recommend favorable consideration of his request.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-00305
On 27 November 2001, his commander notified him he was recommending his AGR tour be curtailed and that he be involuntarily discharged from the FLANG for misconduct, with a service characterization of general, under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC). The IG recommended no further investigation into allegations of reprisal. On 27 October 2004, letter of the IG’s findings notified the applicant.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-00529-3
He was subsequently found unfit for military service and recommended for discharge. A summary of the evidence considered by the Board and the rationale for its decision is set forth in the Record of Proceedings at Exhibits E and F. On 30 March 2006, additional documentation was received from Congressman Peterson’s office and submitted as supporting documentation in reconsideration of the applicant’s appeal for award of the Purple Heart. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-00919
In support of his request, applicant provided documentation associated with his CRSC application. Tractor trailers are not designed primarily for military service and are not unique to combat or military situations; therefore, a tractor trailer is not an instrumentality of war. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were not incurred as the direct result of armed...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-00986
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the appeal and the rationale of the earlier decision, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit G. In this most recent submission, applicant contends that due to combat fatigue his back was injured after falling while exiting a combat aircraft. The complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit H. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: After again reviewing the evidence of...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-01029
However, after he returned, the police charged both him and his wife for receiving stolen property. He indicated on the Report of Medical History that his health was “excellent,” no medications were needed, and he had no recurrent back pain, arthritis/rheumatism, joint/bone pain or any other medical problem. AB-3838, dated 27 Aug 76, reflects the applicant was discharged, not released, from active duty.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-01292
On 25 November 1987, his commander notified him he was being involuntarily discharged with a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. DPFOC contends no error or injustice occurred during the discharge and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, DPFOC recommends relief be denied ANG/DPFOC’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-01344A
Ms. Looney voted to grant the applicant’s requests and submitted a minority report at Exhibit P. The following additional documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit G. Record of Proceeding, w/atchs, dated 17 Aug 04. Exhibit P. Minority Report RITA S. LOONEY Panel Chair MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS (AFBCMR) SUBJECT: AFBCMR Application of XXXXXXX, BC-2004-01344 The Board majority has accepted the recommendation of AFLSA/JAJM to...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-01407-2
___________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant submitted a similar appeal, which was considered and denied by the Board on 15 September 2004. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit H. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: In earlier findings, the Board determined there was insufficient evidence to prove the applicant’s nonjudicial punishment, imposed...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-01421-2
Even if the applicable statute and regulations required minority membership on his promotion board (which they do not), an African-American did sit as a voting member of his promotion board. The complete AF/JAA evaluation is at Exhibit I. AFGOMO recommends the applicant’s request be denied. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-01692
On 3 April 1969, the applicant was notified that he was being discharged under the provisions of Air Force Manual (AFM) 39-10 for Mental Hygiene Evaluation. They state based on the documentation on file in the applicant’s master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharged regulation. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-01785-3
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the application, and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit F. On 22 Nov 04, the Board considered and granted the applicant’s request to have her EPR closing 12 May 01, voided and removed from her records; and that she be provided supplemental consideration for promotion to the grade of staff sergeant for all appropriate cycles beginning with cycle 02E5. For an accounting...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-01792
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01792 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 5 DECEMBER 2006 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded. In his undated response to our request for post-service information, the applicant provided a personal statement and a Metro Lift application (Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-01936
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: With regard to nonjudicial punishment (NJP) he received and the Flying Evaluation Board (FEB) he underwent: 1. Regarding his allegation that the FEB considered improper evidence, DPFOC states the NJP and R&CB evidence were proper and relevant to show the procedural standing of the case. DPFOC notes neither the applicant nor counsel objected to this evidence at its presentation.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-01982
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01982 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: Not Indicated MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 2 Feb 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, diabetes mellitus, Meniere's syndrome, degenerative arthritis of the lumbar spine, cervical spine and left knee, inflammation of the iris,...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-01986
His CRSC application was disapproved on 19 Apr 04 based upon the fact that his service-connected medical conditions were determined not to be combat- related. DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records show his skin condition is not combat related. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 28 Jan 05...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-02065
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02065 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 AUG 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show that he was awarded the Legion of Merit (LOM), rather than the Meritorious Service Medal, Fourth Oak Leaf Cluster (MSM, 4OLC), for the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-02070-2
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02070 INDEX CODE: 137.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her deceased husband’s records be changed to show he elected Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage for her. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s request and the rationale of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-02181
He believes the absence of this information prejudiced his consideration for promotion to the grade of colonel. He states the Air Force awarded him two DFC (Basic) awards in 1992 and later claimed that one of the DFCs had not been awarded until after his colonel selection board. Although the panel has recommended the applicant’s records, to include two Air Medals (AMs) and a Meritorious Service Medal (MSM), be considered by an SSB for the CY01B board, they do not recommend the DFC, 1 OLC,...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-02189
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02189 INDEX CODE: COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility be changed from “Ineligible” to “Eligible.” _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He moved to Texas for employment reasons and concurrently transferred from...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-02282
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02282 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 25 Jan 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, degenerative arthritis and condition of the skeletal system, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-02290-1
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant submitted a similar appeal which was considered and denied by the board on 5 Aug 06. His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: After again reviewing this application along with the additional documentation provided it remains our opinion that the medical conditions the applicant believes...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-02295-2
The Board majority finds no evidence of error in this case and after thoroughly reviewing the documentation that has been submitted in support of his appeal, does not believe he has suffered from an injustice. _________________________________________________________________ DECISION OF THE BOARD: A majority of the panel finds insufficient evidence of error or injustice and recommends the application be denied. JOE G. LINEBERGER Director Air Force Review Boards Agency AFBCMR...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-02455
AFBCMR BC-2004-02455 INDEX CODE: 131.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-02460
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02460 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 18 JAN 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, hypertension, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. After a...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-02465
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She resubmitted her application to the Wing Commander (WG/CC) at Moody AFB and, after a lengthy review the WG/CC’s decision was to not upgrade her AFAM to an AFCM. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-02505
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02505 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 15 Aug 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, back strain and migraine headaches, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-02538-2
On his request, dated 31 May 06, the applicant requests his records be reviewed to determine if he was penalized six months of active service based on being inadvertently discharged while in Palace Option status. The retention/retirement date of 30 September was reestablished in 1997 and the points were realigned to the 10 May retention/retirement date (based on his commissioning service date). Exhibit I. Addendum to the Recording of Proceedings, dated 26 Aug 05, with Exhibits.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-02550
The IG recommended he be reinstated to the RCTG program and to resume his duties. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Apr 05. RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC [pic] Office Of The Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2004-02550 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-02625A
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02625 INDEX NUMBER: 108.00 XXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: DAV XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: Yes MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 20 Feb 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The 10% disability rating she was given when removed from the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) on 14 Jul 04 be changed to a minimum of 30%...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-02645
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His injuries were incurred while manually lifting an aircraft canopy during simulated combat operations. His request was denied by the CRSC board, which opined that his injuries do not qualify for CRSC because injuries incurred as a result of lifting do not meet the criteria to qualify for CRSC compensation. The Board majority believes the applicant's service-connected conditions qualify for CRSC...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-02749
The applicant served on active duty in the Air Force from 23 April 1951 to 12 November 1953 and then transferred to the Air Force Reserve. BCMR Medical Consultant’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and stated that since the VA reduced his 20% disability to 0% and as a result of a VA physical on 21 February 1967 at the Oakland Army...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-02791
A medical evaluation, dated 17 September 1968, indicates the applicant was seen for headaches. A Veterans Administration Report of Medical Examination for Disability Evaluation, dated 4 December 1972, notes a history of the knee giving out many times - this began in 1970. The evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 2 September 2005, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-02826-2
AFBCMR BC-2004-02826 INDEX NUMBER: 100.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, the applicant's records should be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-02945
Each time he was told it was being worked. Was the selected individual eligible to apply for the 2R171 position as stated in applicable regulations at the time? _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-02998
As noted in the medical opinions provided by the high qualified medical experts, it is not probable that his back injury was not caused by changing a tire, but it is highly probable his back injury was a direct result of flying duties. The Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states three very qualified doctors have offered their opinion that the back...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-03002-2doc
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03002-2 INDEX CODE: 137.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests his record be corrected to reflect his former spouse as the eligible Survivor Benefit Program (SBP) beneficiary as dictated in his divorce decree. On 30...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-03138
The applicant was honorably released from the Air Force on 5 September 2004 under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (Completion of Required Active Service). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant states the Service dental record indicates that the applicant received all appropriate dental services within 90 days prior to separation. _________________________________________________________________ The following...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-03265
Has 20 or more years of active service in the Uniformed Services for the purpose of computing the amount of retired pay, or is entitled to retired pay under section 12731 of Title 10, United States Code, unless such retirement is under section 12731b of that same title. Under CRSC II the first preliminary requirement is that the member has retired with an active duty retirement of 20 years or is a reservist entitled to retirement (20 years of military service) and is at least age 60. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-03293
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03293 INDEX CODE: 108.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 NOV 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: It appears the applicant is requesting his honorable discharge be changed to a medical retirement and that he be eligible for Combat- Related Special Compensation (CRSC). Review...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-03378
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/XOOT states he met the requirement for permanent award of the Enlisted Aircrew Member Badge prior to his separation from service and recommends his DD Form be corrected accordingly. Exhibit K. Letter, Applicant, dated 24 May 06. CHARLENE M. BRADLEY Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2004-03378 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-03392
Members of the Board, Mr. Michael J. Novel, Mr. Grover L. Dunn, and Mr. John E. B. Smith, considered this application on 28 June 2006. NOVEL Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 24 May 06, w/atch AFBCMR BC-2004-03392 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-03429-2
On 2 March 2005, the applicant's request to be awarded Air Force Command Insignia was considered and denied by the Board. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: After again reviewing this application and the additional evidence provided in support of his appeal, a majority of the Board remains unpersuaded the applicant’s should be awarded the Air Force Command Insignia. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-03460
The FPEB’s findings, dated 27 February 2003, confirmed the findings of the IPEB and recommended the applicant be discharged with severance pay with a disability rating of 20% for chronic musculoligamentous back pain and chronic neck pain associated with degenerative disk disease. The BCMR Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 21 October 2005, a copy of the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-03463-2
In a new DD Form 149, dated 7 Aug 06, applicant requests the Board reopen her case and review it in its entirety based on two letters she submits, which she believes supports her previous contention she was reprised against by a General officer due to the filing of an Inspector General (IG) complaint against him. Likewise, the other statement also does not provide compelling evidence to support her allegation she has not received full and fair consideration both by this Board and the...