SECOND ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01785-3
INDEX NUMBER: 111.02
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
In her request for reconsideration, applicant requests that the
Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) rendered for the period 23 Oct 97
through 12 May 00, reflecting a promotion recommendation of “4” be
upgraded to a promotion recommendation of “5.”
___________________________________________________________________
RESUME OF CASE:
On 1 Sep 04, the Board considered and denied the applicant’s
request that the EPR rendered for the period 23 Oct 97 through
12 May 00, reflecting an overall promotion recommendation of “4” be
removed from her records and a reaccomplished report reflecting an
overall promotion recommendation of “5” be substituted in its
place. The Board further noted if the applicant believed her
subsequent report closing 12 May 01, was in error or unjust and
requested its removal from her records, they would be willing to
entertain such a request. For an accounting of the facts and
circumstances surrounding the application, and the rationale of the
earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings (ROP)
at Exhibit F.
On 22 Nov 04, the Board considered and granted the applicant’s
request to have her EPR closing 12 May 01, voided and removed from
her records; and that she be provided supplemental consideration
for promotion to the grade of staff sergeant for all appropriate
cycles beginning with cycle 02E5. For an accounting of the facts
and circumstances surrounding the application, and the rationale of
the earlier decision by the Board, see the Addendum Record of
Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit H.
In a letter dated 6 Jan 06, the applicant requests reconsideration
of the Board’s earlier decision denying upgrade of her EPR closing
12 May 00 to an overall rating of “5.” She gages her request on
failure of her rating chain to conduct performance feedback in
accordance with AFI 36-2406 (Exhibit I).
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
After careful consideration of the evidence of record and the
applicant’s most recent submission, we still find insufficient
evidence has been provided that would indicate her 2000 EPR was
either erroneous or unjust. The applicant has again failed to
present any facts or circumstances supporting an injustice that
would warrant upgrading her 2000 EPR. Based on the foregoing, and
in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis upon
which to favorably consider her request.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
___________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2004-
01785 in Executive Session on 27 February 2006, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
Mr. John E. B. Smith, Member
Ms. Kathy L. Boockholdt, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit H. Addendum Record of Proceedings, dated 30 Mar 05,
W/exhibits A through G.
Exhibit I. Applicant's Letter, dated 6 Jan 06, w/atchs.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01785
In support of her request, the applicant submits a personal statement, and a copy of her application to the Evaluation Reports Appeal Board (ERAB), which included a supporting statement from the rater on the contested report. There was no documentation proving that applicant’s evaluators placed any undue emphasis concerning her failure to properly secure classified material as nothing was documented on her report pertaining to the incident. HQ AFPC/DPPPW states the first time the contested...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01296
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01296 INDEX CODE: 111.05 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: MS. HALEVI HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 22 OCT 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be provided supplemental promotion consideration for cycle 05E7 with an AF Form 910, Enlisted Performance Report closing out on 7 August 2004, included in her records. ...
We further recommend that she be provided supplemental promotion consideration with her corrected records, beginning with cycle 97E6. The following additional documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit H. Record of Proceedings, dated 22 Jun 01, w/atchs. THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ Vice Chair AFBCMR 00-03241 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03357
CLOSING DATE OVERALL EVALUATION 31 Dec 03 5 31 Dec 02 5 31 Dec 01 4 (Contested) 15 Nov 00 5 31 Dec 99 5 1 May 99 5 1 May 98 5 1 May 97 5 1 May 96 5 1 May 95 5 The applicant filed a similar appeal under the provisions of AFI 36- 2401. He further contended he had only 48 days of supervision with the rater of the 31 Dec 01 EPR, and that the closeout date was changed from 15 Nov 01 to 31 Dec 01. If the applicant received a new rater in Jul 01 as the Air Force asserts, then the EPR’s reporting...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPWB addressed the supplemental promotion consideration issue should the applicant’s request be approved. DPPPWB stated that the first time the contested report was considered in the promotion process was Cycle 97E5 to staff sergeant (E-5), promotions effective Sep 97 - Aug 98. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Having...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02718
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02718 INDEX CODES: 100.05, 111.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 4 Mar 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: By amendment, his promotion eligibility be reinstated so his test scores for the 03E6 cycle can be graded; he receive promotion consideration for cycle 04E6; his training status code...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00514
In support of his request, the applicant submits a personal statement; a letter of support from his additional rater; and copies of the documentation surrounding his referral EPR and UIF; his application to the Evaluation Reports Appeal Board (ERAB); the ERAB decision; performance feedback worksheets; his APRs closing 20 December 2002, 9 February 2002, 9 February 2001, and 9 February 2000; award of the Air Force Commendation Medal; and an Air Combat Command Team Award. The additional rater...
AF | BCMR | CY1994 | BC 1994 02998
The AFBCMR issued AFBCMR Directive 94-02998 (Corrected Copy), dated 17 Jan 96, directing the two contested OPRs be declared void and removed from her records; her records be corrected to show she was not released from her AGR position on 12 Jul 91, but continued to serve until 11 May 94, at which point she would have attained 20 years of total active federal military service (TAFMS); on 12 May 94, she was released from her AGR tour and transferred to the Reserve; and, her corrected records...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-1994-02998
The AFBCMR issued AFBCMR Directive 94-02998 (Corrected Copy), dated 17 Jan 96, directing the two contested OPRs be declared void and removed from her records; her records be corrected to show she was not released from her AGR position on 12 Jul 91, but continued to serve until 11 May 94, at which point she would have attained 20 years of total active federal military service (TAFMS); on 12 May 94, she was released from her AGR tour and transferred to the Reserve; and, her corrected records...
If the referral EPR closing 11 Dec 96 is removed as requested, the applicant would normally be entitled to supplemental promotion consideration to technical sergeant beginning with the 97E6 cycle provided she is recommended by her commander and is otherwise qualified. However, as a result of her circumstances, the applicant has not received an EPR subsequent to the referral EPR (reason for ineligibility), has not taken the required promotion tests, and has not been considered or recommended...