RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01792
INDEX CODE: 110.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 5 DECEMBER 2006
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His undesirable discharge be upgraded.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His problems began while he was in basic training. His instructor threw
him off a bunk injuring his head, neck and back. The next day his body was
sore and his hearing was impaired. He started hearing voices and people
talking to him. Three days later he was instructed to report to the
infirmary and to tell the doctors and nurses that he was hearing voices.
He was examined and was told that he was “home sick.” He received no
medication or follow-up visit.
After basic training he was reassigned to permanent K.P. where he washed
trays and loaded trucks. He was asked by his sergeant to unload a truck.
He responded with the slang word “solid.” He was later arrested and
charged with telling his sergeant to “shut up.” He lost his stripe and
hope of getting relieved from permanent K.P.
He received orders to Japan. He went home on furlough for a few days
without any money. He was desperate, stranded and unable to get to his
base. He reported to Ellington AFB and was helped to get to his next base.
He arrived one and one-half days late and was court-martialed and
sentenced to six months without pay and issued a bad conduct discharge.
After serving his sentence he was told that he was going to receive an
undesirable discharge instead of a bad conduct discharge.
He received his undesirable discharge for no good reason and has walked
through life ashamed. He has suffered another head injury and was recently
diagnosed with throat cancer.
He remains faithful that he will get a fair hearing.
No supporting documents. The applicant’s complete submission, with
attachments, is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
It appears fire may have destroyed the majority of the applicant’s military
personnel records in 1973. Therefore, the facts surrounding his Air Force
military service cannot be verified. The following is the only known
information concerning his military service and was extracted from the
available documentation submitted by the applicant.
On 2 April 1954, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force at the age
of 18. On 20 January 1956, he was discharged in the grade of airman basic
(E-1) and issued an undesirable discharge certificate. He served 1 year, 9
months and 18 days on active duty.
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
provided a copy of an investigative report pertaining to the applicant
(Identification Record No. 45365D), which is at Exhibit E.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
NO AIR STAFF ADVISORY.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S RESPONSE:
On 23 August 2004 a copy of the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI)
report was forwarded to the applicant. As of this date, this office has
received no response (Exhibit C). In his undated response to our request
for post-service information, the applicant provided a personal statement
and a Metro Lift application (Exhibit D).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. We find no impropriety in the
characterization of applicant's discharge. It appears that responsible
officials applied appropriate standards in effecting the separation, and we
do not find persuasive evidence that pertinent regulations were violated or
that applicant was not afforded all the rights to which entitled at the
time of discharge. We conclude, therefore, that the discharge proceedings
were proper and characterization of the discharge was appropriate to the
existing circumstances. Although the applicant has provided some
documentation concerning his post-service activities, we find this
information insufficient to warrant an upgrade of his discharge on the
basis of clemency. In addition, in view of the contents of the FBI
Identification Record we are not persuaded that the characterization of the
applicant’s discharge warrants an upgrade on the basis of clemency. In
view of the above we find no basis to warrant favorable action on this
application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application
was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will
only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant
evidence not considered with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 9 March 2005, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Charlene M. Bradley, Panel Chair
Ms. Josephine L. Davis, Panel Member
Mr. James A. Wolffe, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered for AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2004-01792:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 13 Jul 04 w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letters, AFBCMR, dated 5 Aug 05 & 23 Aug 05.
Exhibit D. Letter, Applicant, undated w/atch.
Exhibit E. FBI Report.
CHARLENE M. BRADLEY
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02826
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02826 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 1 Aug 81, the applicant was counseled for failure to go. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF FBI...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02666
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS During the time he was in the Air Force, it was very difficult for Blacks. The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2008-02666 in Executive Session on 16 December 2008, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00289
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00289 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 28 JULY 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions). DPPRS states that based upon the documentation in the file, the discharge was...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02258
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-02258 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. We considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to compel us to recommend granting the relief...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03129
On 4 April 1986, the applicant was discharged in the grade of airman first class (E-3) for misconduct – drug abuse, with a general service characterization. We considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to compel us to recommend granting the relief sought on that basis. The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2008-03129 in Executive Session on 29 October 2008, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02627
However, as of this date, this office has received no response. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicant’s complete submission, we find no evidence of error or injustice. We also find insufficient evidence to warrant a recommendation that the discharge be upgraded on the basis of clemency.
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01583
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was addicted to marijuana for many years of his life. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority. Exhibit F. Applicant’s Letter, dated 26 Jun 08, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00785
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-00785 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions discharge (UOTHC) be upgraded to a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, not dated. Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, dated 30 Apr 08.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02040
On 15 June 1973, applicant was discharged under the provisions of AFM 39-12, Chapter 2, Section D, paragraph 2-55, and issued an Undesirable Discharge Certificate, with a UOTHC service characterization. They concluded that the evidence submitted was insufficient to warrant a change in the type or nature of the discharge (see AFDRB Hearing Record at Exhibit B). At the time of the applicant’s discharge, the service characterization received was appropriate under the provisions of the...
c , i IN THE MATTER OF: -- DOCKET NUMBER: 97-01440 AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS COUNSEL: NONE RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS JUL 2 11998 HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His discharge be upgraded to honorable. Records indicate that on 1 August 1970, the applicant, in the grade of sergeant, received an undesirable discharge. After reviewing the evidence of record, we are not persuaded that applicant's discharge should be upgraded.