RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00919
INDEX CODE: 108.07
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 28 Jul 07
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His service-connected medical conditions, limited motion of cervical and
lumbar spine and knee condition, be assessed as combat related in order to
qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation
(CRSC) Act.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His condition was caused by an instrumentality of war, tractor trailer
accident. His injury was incurred when he was riding on top of a load of
sheetrock loaded on a tractor trailer, when the driver entered a sharp
curve too fast and he was thrown to the ground along with the load. His
injury was further aggravated by two rear-end vehicle accidents in April
1988 and May 1989.
In support of his request, applicant provided documentation associated with
his CRSC application. His complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Data extracted for documentation provided by the applicant reflects he
retired from the Air Force on 1 Jan 71, in the grade of master sergeant,
after serving 20 years and 4 months on active duty.
Available Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) records reflect a combined
compensable rating of 70% for his unfitting conditions.
His CRSC application was disapproved on 17 Dec 03 based upon the fact that
his service-connected medical conditions were determined not to be combat-
related.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPD recommends denial. DPPD states other than his own account of the
events involving the tractor trailer mishap, there is no evidence in his
service medical records or personnel records to confirm his contention.
CRSC cannot be approved absent clear documentation which links the
condition to a combat related factor. However, if documentation did exist,
the injuries from this type of event would not meet CRSC criteria. An
instrumentality of war is defined as a "vehicle, vessel, or device designed
primarily for military service and intended for use in such service at the
time of the occurrence or injury." Tractor trailers are not designed
primarily for military service and are not unique to combat or military
situations; therefore, a tractor trailer is not an instrumentality of war.
The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Applicant responded and states that CRSC guidance also states an
instrumentality of war "...may also include instrumentalities not designed
primarily for military service if the use of, or occurrence involving, such
instrumentality subjects the individual to a hazard peculiar to military
service..." In further support of his request, applicant provided his
personal statement, his physician's consultation report, his DVA Hearing
Transcript, a photograph, and excerpts of articles containing CRSC
guidance. His complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit G.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. After a thorough review of the available
evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical
conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were not incurred as
the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service, in
the performance of duty under conditions simulating war, or through an
instrumentality of war, and therefore, do not qualify for compensation
under the CRSC Act. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the
Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an
error or injustice. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2004-
00919 in Executive Session on 28 Apr 06, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Member
Mr. James W. Russell III, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 15 Mar 04, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBC, dated 10 Nov 04.
Exhibit D. Letter, Applicant, dated 5 Mar 05.
Exhibit E. Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 13 Feb 06.
Exhibit F. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 Feb 06.
Exhibit G. Letter, Applicant, dated 13 Mar 06, w/atchs.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01611
Her AF Form 356, Findings and Recommended Disposition of USAF Physical Evaluation Board, dated 1 Oct 04, be changed in item 10d, Disability was the Direct Result of a Combat Related Injury, to reflect "Yes." Instrumentality of war is defined as "a vehicle, vessel, or device designed primarily for military Service and intended for use in such Service at the time of the occurrence of the injury. Further, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical condition the applicant believes is...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026619
He further states, in effect, the applicant is entitled to CRSC because he has received a 10 percent (%) disability rating percentage from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) for the injury to his toe, which was incurred when an ammunition trailer, an "instrumentality of war," fell on his foot. Counsel provides a DA Form 8-275-3 that shows the applicant was admitted to the 93d Evacuation Hospital at 1530 hours on 6 February 1970 for a laceration to his left great toe. Department of...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03911
A review of his medical records failed to show that his back injury was sustained on 12 Nov 65 as a result of a missile motor slipping its cradle during assembly in support of combat training missions. The Medical Consultant states a single medical record entry indicates he presented for lumbosacral back pain on 12 Nov 65 but no mechanism of injury is documented and there are no work-site accident or injury reports present in the records that may provide additional information. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-00220
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial of the applicant’s request for granting establishment of the designation that his PTSD was the direct result of armed conflict or caused by an instrumentality of war, during a period of war. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant, through his service representative states...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01820
He served various assignments in the Air Force Reserves and Air National Guard as an enlisted member, attaining the grade of senior master sergeant. DPPD states although military duties can be strenuous, injuries from routine activities such as lifting equipment, are not sufficient to be considered combat-related, even when the event occurs while performing military duties or training unless some combat event was occurring at the same time, which caused or aggravated the injury. We agree...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00018
There is no evidence to support his claim his back condition was the result of loading equipment onto aircraft and trucks. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were not incurred as the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service, in the performance of duty under conditions simulating war, or through an instrumentality of war, and...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2003-04056
A 30 Mar 67, Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) hearing found that he was fit for duty at that time. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were not incurred as the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service, in the performance of duty under conditions simulating war, or through an instrumentality of war, and therefore, do not qualify for...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03210
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03210 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 19 Apr 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, scleredema adultorum (lupus), be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC)...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03178
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03178 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 21 Apr 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her service-connected medical condition, condition of the skeletal system (wrist), be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00025
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00025 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 7 Jul 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, spinal disc condition, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. ...