RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03378
INDEX CODE: 110.00,107.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 5 MAR 2007
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
1. His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty,
be amended as follows:
a. Section 1, Name – be corrected to reflect the name XXXX vice
XXXX.
b. Section 11, Primary Specialty – be corrected to reflect 1A331
vice 1A351.
c. Section 13, Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign
Ribbons awarded or authorized – to include the Enlisted Aircrew Member
Badge.
d. Section 14, Military Education – to include the Enlisted Aircrew
Undergraduate Course, 4 weeks, July 2001, Airborne Communications Specialty
Apprentice Course, 12 Weeks, October 2001, Combat Survival Training Course,
3 Weeks, November 2001, Water Survival Training Course, 1 Week, November
2001, Career Development Course, Part A, 6 Months, June 2002, Career
Development Course, Part B, 8 Months, March 2003, and the Community College
of the Air Force Associates Degree in Communications Systems Technology,
June 2003,
e. Section 18, Remarks – to include Top Secret Clearance.
f. Section 26, Separation Code be corrected to reflect “KFF” vice
“JFX.”
g. Section 27, Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed.
h. Section 28, Narrative Reason for Separation be changed from
Personality Disorder to Secretarial Authority.
2. His DD Form 2697, Report of Medical Assessment, dated 18 June 2003,
Section II, be changed to correct the inconsistencies in Items 20 and 21.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was a model airman and solid performer until the incident of mixing
prescribed medications, alcohol and cutting himself in May 2003, which led
to his administrative discharge from the Air Force. After reviewing the
evidence of record the Board will see the errors and injustice that he
suffered because of the implementation of the so called “Rapid Discharge”
program, the injustice of improperly labeling his narrative reason for
separation as personality disorder and issuing an RE code of 2C. Many
administrative errors and omissions occurred which could have been
prevented if the discharge authorities had the required time to investigate
his case.
In support of his request, applicant provided a personal statement and
documentation extracted from his military personnel and medical records.
His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 1 May 2001 the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force in the grade
of airman for a period of four years.
On 17 Jun 03, applicant was notified by his commander of his intent to
recommend that he be discharged from the Air Force under the provisions of
AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.11.9, Conditions that Interfere
with Military Service. The specific reason for this action was he was
diagnosed with an adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood
and personality disorder not otherwise specified under the Diagnostic and
Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. He was advised of his rights in
this matter and acknowledged receipt of the notification on that same date.
The applicant consulted counsel and elected not to submit statements on
his own behalf. In a legal review of the case file, the staff judge
advocate found the case legally sufficient and recommended that he be
discharged. The discharge authority concurred with the recommendations and
directed that he be discharged with an honorable discharge, without
probation and rehabilitation. Applicant was discharged on 20 Jun 03. He
served 2 years, 1 month and 19 days on active duty.
He was assigned an RE code of 2C which denotes "Involuntarily separated
with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without
characterization of service."
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/XOOT states he met the requirement for permanent award of the Enlisted
Aircrew Member Badge prior to his separation from service and recommends
his DD Form be corrected accordingly.
The complete XOOT evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPPAC states a review of his records substantiates is claim that item
11 does not accurately reflect the AFSC skill level in which he performed
while on active duty and recommends his DD Form 214 be corrected to
reflect: 1A351, Airborne Communications and Electronics Systems Journeyman,
2 years.
The complete DPPAC evaluation is at Exhibit D.
AFPC/DPPAT states review of the applicant’s CCAF record indicates the
applicant still required award of the 5-skill level and 7.6 semester hours
in program electives. Even with the award of his 5-skill level, he has not
completed the required number of hours for degree completion.
The complete DPPAT evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit E.
The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial. The Medical Consultant
states adjustment disorder is characterized by marked psychological
distress in response to identifiable stressors that overcome the
individual's ability to cope and is frequently associated with significant
impairment in social and occupational functioning. Personality disorders
are enduring patterns of maladjustment in the individual's personality
structure which are not medically disqualifying but may render the
individual unsuitable for further military service and may be cause for
administrative discharge. By definition, a personality disorder is an
enduring pattern of thinking, inner experience, feeling, and behaving that
is pervasive and inflexible, is relatively stable over time, deviates from
the individual's cultural norms, and causes distress of impairment in
social and occupational functioning. Personality disorders are frequently
exacerbated by stress and may not cause significant problems or be
recognized until stressful circumstances result in occupational and social
problems. The fact that he did well during his first two years of service
and the fact that he is doing well at this time does not contradict the
diagnosis since symptoms wax and wane according to situation and stress.
The fact that he is doing well at home confirms the diagnosis of adjustment
disorder, however his history of personal problems resulting in significant
impairment of functioning combined with the results of psychological
evaluation indicate that he is at risk for recurrent problems under similar
circumstances of personal and military occupational stress.
A review of his medical records show his knee and neck conditions were not
unfitting for continued military service. The fact that he was symptomatic
at the time of his compensation and pension examination does not establish
that the conditions were unfitting and required processing through the
disability evaluation system. After December 2002 there were no further
complaints of knee pain and neck pain until he reinjured his neck just
prior to discharge. At the time of the separation examination, the
examination of the neck was normal and there was no indication of a
condition that would interfere with his duties or which required a Medical
Evaluation Board.
The complete Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit F.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS:
The applicant responded that he feels the rapid discharge program when
first implemented led to many administrative errors and omissions as shown
on his DD Form 214. Statements in some of his medical records were
conflicting and confusing. He willfully took prescription drugs, drank
alcohol and cut himself. His self destructive actions caused him to be
administratively discharged from the Air Force. The drugs did not cause
his separation. He does not want to be processed through the Physical
Evaluation system nor be medically retired, nor does he want to reenlist in
the service. He respectfully requests that although the Board may find
appropriate regulations were followed and he was separated accordingly
because of his performance and efforts prior to discharge, clemency would
be fair, equitable and appropriate in his case and his request would be
granted.
His complete response, with attachments is at Exhibit H.
_________________________________________________________________
ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRSP states an examination of his records verifies completion of the
PTT NG, Physiological Training Course in October 2001 and recommends his DD
Form 214 be updated accordingly.
DPPRSP recommends denial of the portion of his request regarding his Career
Development Course and security clearance.
The DPPRSP evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit I.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant reviewed the evaluation and states he appreciates the
positive recommendations to change his name and add PTT NG to his DD Form
214. He understands the reasons other items cannot be changed. He request
his application be processed as soon as possible and he waives any further
due process.
The applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit K
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or injustice warranting some corrective action. The
applicant requests numerous corrections be made to his DD Form 214. The
Air Force has concurred with the portions of his requests regarding
correction to his name, primary specialty, and decorations. The Military
Personnel Data System has been updated to reflect his correct military
education data and these corrections have been made to his DD Form 214.
Therefore, we recommend his records be further corrected to the extent
indicated below.
4. Notwithstanding the above, we find insufficient relevant evidence of
error or injustice warranting favorable consideration of his requests for
change in his separation and RE codes, narrative reason for separation, and
for corrections to his 18 Jun 03, Report of Medical Assessment. His
contentions are duly noted and we took notice of his complete submission;
however, it is our opinion that given the circumstances surrounding his
separation from the Air Force, the narrative reason for separation, RE
code, and separation code assigned are proper and in compliance with the
appropriate directives. The applicant has not provided any evidence which
would lead us to believe otherwise. We are not persuaded by his
contentions that his 18 Jun 03, Report of Medical Assessment is in error
and therefore, do not believe the requested corrections are warranted.
With regard to the CCAF degree, it appears he has not completed the
requirements for award of the CCAF degree. Additionally, since security
clearance information and CDC courses are not reflected on the DD Form 214,
we do not believe favorable action on those requests are not warranted
either.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that the DD Form 214, Certificate of
Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be amended as follows:
a. Section 1, Name, be corrected to reflect XXXX, rather than XXXX.
b. Section 11, Primary Specialty, be corrected to reflect 1A351, rather
than 1A331.
c. Section 13, Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign
Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, be amended to include the Enlisted Aircrew
Member Badge.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2004-
03378 in Executive Session on 8 August 2006, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Ms. Charlene M. Bradley, Panel Chair
Mr. John E. Pettit, Member
Mr. James A. Wolffe, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 24 Oct 04, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AF/XOOT, dated 6 Jan 05, w/atch.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPAC, dated 31 Jan 05.
Exhibit E. Letter, AFPC/DPPAT, dated 22 Feb 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit F. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 28 Nov 05.
Exhibit G. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Nov 05.
Exhibit H. Letter, Applicant, dated 27 Dec 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit I. Letter, AFPC/DPPRSP, dated 15 May 06, w/atchs.
Exhibit J. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 May 06.
Exhibit K. Letter, Applicant, dated 24 May 06.
CHARLENE M. BRADLEY
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2004-03378
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to XXXX, be corrected to show that the DD Form 214, Certificate of
Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be amended as follows:
a. Section 1, Name, be corrected to reflect XXXX, rather than
XXXX.
b. Section 11, Primary Specialty, be corrected to reflect
1A351, rather than 1A331.
c. Section 13, Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and
Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, be amended to include the Enlisted
Aircrew Member Badge.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00017 INDEX NUMBER: 100.07;110.02 XXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Block 28, “Narrative Reason for Separation,” of his DD Form 214, “Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty” be changed from “Personality Disorder” to “Secretarial Authority.” His records...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02004
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02004 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 25 Oct 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect his entitlement to the NCO Professional Military Education (NCO PME) Graduate Ribbon and flight crew status. XOOT indicates that the applicant’s military...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03873
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. AFPC/JA states HQ AFPC/DPPRSP has corrected certain aspects of the applicant’s record pertaining to his military education by updating his DD Form 214. They believe the correct action was taken to involuntarily separate the applicant from the Air Force in 2002 under other than honorable conditions and that he should not be reinstated to active duty. Based on the documentation provided, we believe that the applicant did serve in Korea.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01303A
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 19 Aug 04, the Board considered and denied an application pertaining to the applicant, in which he requested that his records be corrected to reflect award of the Aircrew Member Badge and the addition of his C-123 flying hours to his flight records. Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
The Board again considered the application, with this new information, and on 1 Jul 97, a majority of the Board recommended partial relief in the form of supplemental promotion consideration to the grade of master sergeant by the Calendar Year 1995E7 (CY95E) promotion cycle (see Exhibit U). _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: The Chief, Inquiries/AFBCMR Section, AFPC/DPPPWB, reviewed the applicant’s requests and indicated that...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1995-01726A
The Board again considered the application, with this new information, and on 1 Jul 97, a majority of the Board recommended partial relief in the form of supplemental promotion consideration to the grade of master sergeant by the Calendar Year 1995E7 (CY95E) promotion cycle (see Exhibit U). _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: The Chief, Inquiries/AFBCMR Section, AFPC/DPPPWB, reviewed the applicant’s requests and indicated that...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01991
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01991 INDEX CODE: 106.00, 100.05 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 24 Dec 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 reflect an Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) of 81150 rather than 81130, and his 1985 discharge be upgraded from general to honorable. According to his Enlisted...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03566
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03566 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 25 MAY 2007 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Air Medal with “V” device and the Combat Aircrew Insignia. According to the evidence of record, although the applicant performed duties in an aircraft during his tour in...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00503
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00503 INDEX CODE: 131.09 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be changed to indicate he received a 5-skill level in his Air Force Specialty (AFS) and that his pay grade be changed to senior airman (SRA/E-4). DPPPWB states that although he met the time in grade and time in service...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03012
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03012 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 4 APR 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of the Presidential Outstanding Unit Citation (PUC), the Korean Service Medal (KSM), and the Aviation Badge. A complete copy of the...