Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-01982
Original file (BC-2004-01982.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2004-01982
            INDEX CODE:  108.07
            COUNSEL:  NONE
            HEARING DESIRED:  Not Indicated

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 2 Feb 07

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His  service-connected  medical  conditions,  diabetes  mellitus,  Meniere's
syndrome, degenerative arthritis of the lumbar  spine,  cervical  spine  and
left knee, inflammation of the iris, traumatic arthritis of the left  wrist,
hiatal hernia, and malaria, be  assessed  as  combat  related  in  order  to
qualify for compensation  under  the  Combat  Related  Special  Compensation
(CRSC) Act.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was  medically  retired  for  his  disabilities.   He  was  told  he  was
ineligible because he had not waived his military retirement.   He  has  now
waived his retirement.

In support of his request,  applicant  provided  a  personal  statement  and
documentation  associated  with  his   CRSC   application.    His   complete
submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant's military personnel records  cannot  be  located,  therefore  his
military service cannot be verified.   Data  extracted  from  the  personnel
data system reflects on 13 Jul 73, he retired from  the  Air  Force  in  the
grade of master sergeant, having served 22 years, 8 months and  18  days  on
active duty.

Available Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) records  reflect  a  combined
compensable rating of 80% for his unfitting conditions.

His CRSC application was disapproved on 2 Jan 04 based upon  the  fact  that
his service-connected medical condition was determined  not  to  be  combat-
related.  His diabetes mellitus was subsequently approved, with a rating  of
20 percent.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPD recommends denial.  DPPD states a review of his  service  and  DVA
medical  records  shows  there  is  no  evidence  his  Meniere's   syndrome,
inflammation of the iris, hiatal hernia, and  malaria  are  combat  related.
To be eligible  for  compensation  there  must  be  clear  documentation  to
indicate these conditions were the result of a combat related  factor.   His
degenerative arthritis of the lumbar spine began  after  he  was  beaten  by
local police in 1955 and the traumatic arthritis of the left wrist  was  due
to an automobile accident.  No evidence can be found to  confirm  the  exact
origin of his degenerative arthritis of the cervical spine and left knee.

The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on  9  Sep
05 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, this office  has
received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  After a thorough review of  the  available
evidence of record, it is our opinion  that  the  service-connected  medical
conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were  not  incurred  as
the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service,  in
the performance of duty under  conditions  simulating  war,  or  through  an
instrumentality of war, and  therefore,  do  not  qualify  for  compensation
under the CRSC Act.  We agree with the opinion  and  recommendation  of  the
Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its  rationale  as  the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the  victim  of  an
error or injustice.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find  no
compelling  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief   sought   in   this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2004-
01982 in Executive Session on 28 Feb 06, under the  provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

      Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
      Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Member
      Mr. Alan A. Blomgren, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 28 May 04, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 1 Sep 05, w/atchs.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Sep 05.




                                   THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                                   Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00390

    Original file (BC-2005-00390.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommends denial. However, evidence has not been provided which would show that any of his conditions were awarded service-connection based on presumption of radiation exposure as required for a combat-related determination. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02061

    Original file (BC-2004-02061.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    His CRSC application was disapproved on 22 Mar 04 based upon the fact that evidence provided did not show his service-connected medical conditions were combat-related. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 30 Jul 04 for review and comment within 30 days. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01646

    Original file (BC-2005-01646.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 31 Mar 88, he voluntarily retired from the Air Force in the grade of staff sergeant, having served 20 years and 17 days on active duty. While his conditions are deemed service connected by the DVA, their standards for approval focus on connecting the claimed disabilities to his period of service. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03600

    Original file (BC-2005-03600.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    He served 36 years, 11 months, and 3 days on active duty Available DVA records reflect a combined compensable rating of 70% for his unfitting conditions. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were not incurred as the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service, in the performance of duty under conditions simulating war, or through...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02309

    Original file (BC-2004-02309.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    During the medical "red flags" and Combat Medical Readiness Training sessions the conditions under which they were conducted simulated war and required both mental and physical stress. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were not incurred as the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service, in the performance of duty under conditions...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00504

    Original file (BC-2004-00504.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00504 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, back strain, condition of the skeletal system, arteriosclerotic heart disease, and hiatal hernia, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03225

    Original file (BC-2004-03225.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    He served 26 years, 6 months, and 27 days on active duty His CRSC application was disapproved on 6 Nov 03 based upon the fact that his service-connected medical conditions were determined not to be combat- related. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states his ejection was in 1959, not 1968 as stated by DPPD. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01855

    Original file (BC-2007-01855.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01855 INDEX CODE: 108.07 XXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, sinusitis and hiatal hernia, be assessed as combat-related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02117

    Original file (BC-2004-02117.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, applicant provided documentation associated with his CRSC application. DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records show his degenerative arthritis and condition of the skeletal system are not combat related. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03573

    Original file (BC-2003-03573.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03573 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: American Legion HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, duodenal ulcer, spinal disc condition, residuals of right and left foot injury, limited motion in cervical spine, varicose veins of right...