RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01077 INDEX CODE: 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His promotion date verification record (DVR) for promotion cycle 01E9 be corrected to reflect his current assignment level status. The rater refers to him as the “perfect First Sergeant”, the additional rater refers to him as “number...
On 8 Apr 99, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was considering whether he should recommend to the Commander, 11th Air Force (11 AF) that he should be punished under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) based on allegations that between on or about 1 Mar 98 and on or about 4 Mar 99, he was derelict in the performance of his duties in that he willfully failed to refrain from engaging in an inappropriate familiar relationship, to include hugging and kissing, with a...
INDEX CODE: 102.07 AFBCMR 02-01082 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
The members of the Board, Mr. Lawrence R. Leehy, Mr. Clarence D. Long III, and Ms. Ann-Cecile McDermott, considered this application on 6 June 2002. LAWRENCE R. LEEHY Panel Chair Attachment: Ltrs, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 21 May 02, w/atch AFBCMR 02-01083 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board...
The members of the Board, Mr. Lawrence R. Leehy, Mr. Clarence D. Long III, and Ms. Ann-Cecile McDermott, considered this application on 6 June 2002. LAWRENCE R. LEEHY Panel Chair Attachment: Ltrs, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 20 May 02, w/atch AFBCMR 02-01084 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force (Exhibit C). The Air Force Discharge Review Board reviewed the case on 15 December 1975 (appeared with counsel) and 10 July 1979, and determined no change in the discharge was warranted. ...
AFBCMR 02-01088 INDEX CODE: 110.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT, SSN Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01089 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason for her discharge from the Air Force be changed from "Personality Disorder" to "Pregnancy/Depression." Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPRSP, dated 24 May 02. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 31 May 02.
The AFPC/DPPPWB evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states that the names of the four enlisted members provided to his Congressman in a letter, dated 27 June 1947, are not his former crew members and are unknown to him. The applicant contends that he would have been promoted along with his five fellow crew members based on their completion of ten combat...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01094 INDEX NUMBER: 131.00; 129.04 XXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: Fred L. Bauer XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: Yes ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Officer Grade Determination (OGD) that required him to retire in the grade of captain be overturned, his retirement grade be corrected to reflect the grade of major, and he be paid all back...
In support of the appeal, applicant submits a copy of his WD AGO Form 53-55 and a Letter of Recommendation, dated 29 May 1944, indicating that he completed a total of 25 combat missions and was awarded the DFC and AM, 3 OLC. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states that at the time he completed a total of 25 combat missions a member would be awarded a DFC and upon completion of every five combat...
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
INDEX CODE 1112.07 128.05 AFBCMR 02-01108 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the...
Members of the Board Ms. Peggy E. Gordon, Mr. Billy C. Baxter, and Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, considered this application on 25 June 2002. PEGGY E. GORDON Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 21 May 02 AFBCMR 02-01110 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military...
AFBCMR 02-01111 INDEX NUMBER: 112.05 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
TSgt O--- was removed as his supervisor in November 1997. The DPPPEP evaluation is at Exhibit B. AFPC/DPPPWB reviewed applicant’s request and states that provided he is otherwise eligible, if the 4 Jan 98 EPR were to be voided he would not become a selectee for the 99E6 promotion cycle. The applicant has established that a possible conflict existed between himself and the rater on the report closing 4 January 1998.
AFBCMR 02-01115 Index Code: 128.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief...
The applicant was requested to provide any documents from his personal files in support of his application and he has not responded to the request. They recommend the requested relief be denied (Exhibit D). There was no evidence in the applicant's records to support he served in Korea or Vietnam.
An upgrade of his discharge would change the legacy to his family (Exhibit A). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS states that based on the documentation in the applicant's records, they believe that the applicant's discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and that the discharge was within the sound discretion of discharge authority. The applicant has not provided...
Members of the Board Mr. David W. Mulgrew, Ms. Brenda L. Romine, and Mr. James E. Short considered this application on June 12, 2002. DAVID W. MULGREW Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd May 21, 2002, w/Atch AFBCMR 02-01121 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction...
AFBCMR 02-01123 INDEX NUMBER: 112.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits B and C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR reviewed applicant's request and states that the letters attached to his application show that the initial paperwork submitted in November 2000 was not a final recommendation package,...
INDEX CODE: 137.04 AFBCMR 02-01127 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 May 02.
On 6 Mar 02, the Board considered and denied an application pertaining to the applicant, requesting that his records be corrected to show that he reenlisted within 90 days of his expiration term of service (ETS) of 31 May 98. On 19 Mar 98, the applicant requested 27 days of terminal Leave, the request was approved and the leave was taken. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 02- 01132 in...
INDEX CODE: 137.04 AFBCMR 02-01133 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
INDEX CODE 112.07 128.05 AFBCMR 02-01134 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR S SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Members of the Board Mr. Jackson A. Hauslein, Mr. James W. Russell III and Mr. John E. B. Smith considered this application on 20 June 2002. RAYMOND...
Members of the Board Ms. Olga M. Crerar, Mr. George Franklin, and Mr. Charlie E. Williams, Jr., considered this application on 11 June 2002. OLGA M. CRERAR Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 24 May 02 AFBCMR 02-01135 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01136 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to reflect award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) and credit for time served in Cuba [Cuban Missile Crisis (24 Oct 62 – 1 Jun 63)]. He...
He received an RE Code of 2B, which defined means "Involuntarily separated under AFR 39-10 with a general discharge or under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge.” Applicant's discharge case file is not in his military personnel records; therefore, the facts surrounding his separation from the Air Force cannot be verified. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the...
Therefore, the board recommended he be discharged with a general discharge. On 8 September 1981, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied his request for an upgrade of his discharge. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicant’s complete submission, we find no evidence of error or injustice.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01139 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Combat Readiness Medal (CRM) and the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the...
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant responded, indicating that nothing can change the facts or the past. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that his general discharge should be upgraded to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES...
In support of his request, applicant provided a personal statement, a copy of his Army of the United States discharge certificate, his Enlisted Record and Report of Separation, his Separation Qualification Record, his military education record, his Honorable Discharge certificate, and documentation associated with his attempts to have his records corrected. On 10 Oct 48, he was discharged from the Air Force Reserves. The DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The...
In support of his request the applicant provided documentation from the awarding authority indicating that if the EPR had been a "5" at the time it was originally rendered, he would have awarded the applicant an AFCM and subsequently upgraded the medal. Therefore, we do not believe it is necessary to recommend supplemental consideration for these cycles. ALBERT F. LOWAS, JR. Panel Chair AFBCMR 02-01144 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of...
Members of the Board, Mr. John L. Robuck, Mr. Albert F. Lowas, Jr., and Mr. William H. Anderson, considered this application on 1 August 2002. JOHN L. ROBUCK Panel Chair Attachments: 1. Ltr, AFPC/DPPTR, dtd 12 Jul 02 AFBCMR 02-01145 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01147 INDEX CODE: 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: Not Indicated _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by Special Selection Board (SSB) for the CY01B Central Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board. DPPPO states that the order for the AFCM was not filed in his OSR. ...
His Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) for the CY98B board had an overall recommendation of “Definitely Promote.” The top report covered the period from 26 Feb 97 through 25 Feb 98. When the selection board convened on 6 Apr 08, it was aware of his 1 Sep 98 retirement date. The applicant had one OPR as a major covering the period 8 Nov 00 through 7 Mar 01; it was the top report reviewed by the selection board.
The doctor told him the only way to get out of the Air Force was to say that he was a homosexual and he would be out in two days. On 25 July 1995, the commander notified the applicant that he was being discharged from the Air Force with an entry-level separation. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE states that the reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2C, Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without...
Applicant also provides a letter of support from his commander at the time verifying the unit’s error in not processing an award on the applicant in time for his promotion board. The selection board had his entire officer selection record that clearly outlined his accomplishments while assigned to the unit that he eventually received the decoration from. After reviewing the complete evidence of record, we find no evidence to support that there was intent to submit the applicant for an...
Members of the Board Mr. Joseph A. Roj, Mr. E. David Hoard, and Mr. William H. Anderson, considered this application on 18 June 2002. JOSEPH A. ROJ Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 1 Jun 02 AFBCMR 02-01160 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records...
AFBCMR 02-01161 INDEX CODE: 112.07 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT, SSN Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
AFBCMR 02-00877 Index Number: 112.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum...
INDEX CODE: 128.05 AFBCMR 02-01164 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
INDEX CODE: 128.05 AFBCMR 02-01165 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
Members of the Board Ms. Olga M. Crerar, Mr. George Franklin, and Mr. Charlie E. Williams, Jr., considered this application on 11 June 2002. OLGA M. CRERAR Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 24 May 02 AFBCMR 02-01166 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of...
Members of the Board, Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Mr. Mike Novel, and Mr. Thomas J. Topolski, Jr., considered this application on 19 June 2002. ROSCOE HINTON, JR. Panel Chair Attachments: Memorandum, AF/DPRCC, dated 31 May 02. AFBCMR 02-01167 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for...
He later received a call from ARPC and they informed him that they would not be able to award him point credit because he was assigned to the IRR Non-participating Ready Personnel Section. He is currently pursuing another reserve job to complete his military retirement. He completed SOS on 3 Jan 2002.
Ltr, AFPC/DPPD, dtd Jun 3, 2002 3. Ltr, AFPC/DPPTR, dtd Jul 17, 2002 AFBCMR 02-01172 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be...