Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0201117
Original file (0201117.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  02-01117
            INDEX CODE: 107.00

      APPLICANT  COUNSEL:  None

      SSN   HEARING DESIRED: No

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected to reflect he served  in  Korea  and  Vietnam
during his Air Force career.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The reasons the applicant believes the  records  to  be  in  error  or
unjust and the evidence submitted in support  of  the  appeal  are  at
Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from  the
applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared  by
the appropriate office of the Air Force.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPAPP2 states there are no documents in the applicant's record
indicating that he was assigned or  TDY  in  Korea  or  Vietnam.   The
applicant was requested to provide any  documents  from  his  personal
files in support of his application and he has not  responded  to  the
request.   DPAPP2  further  states  there  are  no  source   documents
available  in  the  applicant's  records  to  support  his  claim  and
therefore, they recommend denying the requested relief.

A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.

HQ AFPC/DPPPR states the applicant  was  informed  that  there  is  no
information in his records indicating he served or was TDY in Korea or
Vietnam while on active duty.  The applicant was requested to  provide
documentation to support his claim.  The applicant  has  not  provided
any documentation to substantiate his request.  DPPPR  further  states
that without any documentation to support  his  request,  they  cannot
verify his  eligibility  for  any  additional  awards.   However,  the
applicant was awarded the National Defense Service Medal for being  on
active duty during  the  Korean  Conflict  and  the  National  Defense
Service Medal with First Bronze Service Star for being on active  duty
during the Vietnam Conflict.  They recommend the requested  relief  be
denied (Exhibit D).

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on
19 July 2002, for review and response.  As of this date,  no  response
has been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies  provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.    The application was not timely filed;  however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice.  The applicant's contentions  are
duly noted; however,  we  do  not  find  his  contentions  in  and  by
themselves, sufficiently persuasive to override the rationale provided
by the Air Force.  There was no evidence in the applicant's records to
support he served in Korea or Vietnam.  We note the applicant did  not
respond to the requests to provide documentation to  substantiate  his
claim.  Therefore, we agree with the recommendations of the Air  Force
and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our  decision  that
the applicant has failed to sustain  his  burden  of  having  suffered
either an error  or  an  injustice.   Therefore,  in  the  absence  of
evidence to the contrary, we find no  compelling  basis  to  recommend
granting the relief sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following  members of the  Board considered   Docket  Number  02-
01117 in Executive Session on September 4, 2002, under the provisions
of AFI 36-2603:

                       Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Panel Chair
                       Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Member
                  Mr. Philip Sheuerman, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 27 Mar 02.
   Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPAPP2, dated 5 Jun 02.
   Exhibit D.  Letter, AFPC/DPPPR, dated 19 Jun 02.
   Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Jul 02.




                                   THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                                   Vice Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | 0001810A

    Original file (0001810A.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-01810 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests additional credit for his foreign service and that he be awarded the following decorations: Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with Combat “V” Device, the Vietnam Service and Campaign...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02484

    Original file (BC-2002-02484.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The author recommends the applicant be credited with at least 30 days TDY to Tuy Hoa AB, Vietnam during 18 Mar 68 to 13 Apr 69. If it was stamped in Vietnam any time after 28 Mar 68, the applicant could not have been there for 30 days since his medical records show he was in a fistfight in Taiwan on 18 Apr 68 and was hospitalized until 24 Apr 68. While the possibility exists that the applicant may have been in Vietnam at some time, he has provided no evidence verifying that he was TDY...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01452

    Original file (BC-2003-01452.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial. There is no indication in his records that he was TDY at any time while he was on active duty. Dean Yount, Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 17 Apr 03.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01953

    Original file (BC-2003-01953.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 22 July 2003, HQ AFPC/DPAPP2 advised the applicant there were no documents in his personnel file that reflected he was on temporary duty (TDY) to Vietnam. They indicated that they have thoroughly reviewed the applicant’s records and they are unable to find any indication that he was TDY from the Philippines to Vietnam at any time. His assignment to Thailand is after the closeout date for award of the Vietnam Service Medal.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | 0201994

    Original file (0201994.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VA told him to bring in his TDY records which he doesn’t have. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP2 recommends the application be denied. While the possibility exists that the applicant may have been in Vietnam at some time, he has provided no evidence substantiating he was deployed to Vietnam for any specific dates or length of time.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03076

    Original file (BC-2003-03076.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03076 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. His records be corrected to reflect service in Vietnam. After a thorough review of the applicant's submission and the available evidence of record, we are not persuaded that he should be awarded the Purple Heart.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03515

    Original file (BC-2002-03515.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03515 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect his Temporary Duties (TDYs) to Pope AFB and Travis AFB during the Cuban Missile Crisis, and his TDY to Vietnam from Hickam AFB in 1963. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04105

    Original file (BC-2002-04105.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He indicates that he filed a claim and it was denied because his records do not reflect his time served in Vietnam. In support of his appeal, the applicant provided a personal statement. There are no documents in the applicant’s military personnel records that reflect that he was stationed or sent TDY to Vietnam during his tour of duty in the Air Force.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02998

    Original file (BC-2002-02998.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). In support of his request, applicant provided a copy of his DD Form 214 and a copy of his service record. The DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 22 Nov 02 and 7 Mar 03 for review and comment within 30 days.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | 0001657

    Original file (0001657.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 00-01657 INDEX CODE 107.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Not Indicated _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records reflect that he served in the 44th Fighter Bomber Squadron at Clark AFB during the Korean War and that he was on temporary duty (TDY) to Japan (Johnson AFB) and Formosa for a period of 90-plus days. ...