RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01143
INDEX CODE: 100.06
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2C be changed.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or
unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the
letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force.
Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in this Record of
Proceedings.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS reviewed this application and recommended denial.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPPAE reviewed this application and indicated that the RE code of
2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry
level separation without characterization of service, is
correct)(Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to applicant on 31
May 02 for review and response. As of this date, no response has been
received by this office (Exhibit E).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. After careful consideration of
applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find
insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective
action. The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear
to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by
applicant. Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights to
which entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or
appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to disturb
the existing record.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 02-
01143 in Executive Session on 2 Jul 02, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Joseph A. Roj, Panel Chair
Mr. Christopher Carey, Member
Mr. John B. Hennessey, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 23 Apr 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 16 May 02.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 23 May 02.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 31 May 02.
JOSEPH A. ROJ
Panel Chair
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01354 INDEX CODE: 100.06 . Accordingly, we recommend that the applicant’s RE code of 2C be changed to one requiring a waiver; that is, RE-3K (Reserved for use by HQ AFPC or the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) when no other reenlistment eligibility code applies or is appropriate). Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01551
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01551 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code of 2C be changed to make him eligible to enlist in the Armed Forces. The AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE states that the RE Code of 2C (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01551 INDEX CODE 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code of 2C be changed to make him eligible to enlist in the Armed Forces. The AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE states that the RE Code of 2C (involuntarily separated with an honorable...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01193 INDEX CODE: 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code and narrative reason for separation be changed. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02362
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Through his congressman, the applicant provided a statement as to the circumstances surrounding his recruitment in the Air Force, his military service and subsequent discharge. In view of the foregoing, we recommend the applicant’s records be corrected by deleting the words “and conduct” from his narrative reason...
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied the member's request to change her reason for discharge on 7 April 1997. A DD Form 215, Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, has been completed to correct these errors, and is now filed in the member’s records. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an...
On 18 December 2001, the Assistant Staff Judge Advocate recommended that the applicant be separated from the service with an Entry Level Separation. Applicant was discharged on 9 January 2002, in the grade of airman basic with an Entry Level Performance and Conduct discharge, under the provisions of AFI 36-3208. The Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 2C, “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service” is correct.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01488
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01488 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be upgraded to 1 and that her uncharacterized entry level separation be changed to an honorable discharge. The BCMR Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPPRS recommends the narrative reason for the...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-00242 INDEX NUMBER: 110.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation code and his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code 2C be changed to an eligible code so that he can reenlist and continue in the Air Force. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE states the RE code the applicant received is the appropriate code for those members separated "involuntarily with an honorable discharge or an entry level separation without characterization of service (Exhibit D). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 24 May 2002, for...