Members of the Board Mr. Lawrence R. Leehy, Mr. Clarence D. Long III and Ms. Ann-Cecile McDermott, considered this application on 6 June 2002. LAWRENCE R. LEEHY Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 17 Apr 02 AFBCMR 02-00955 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of...
The applicant was diagnosed with an adjustment disorder and personality disorder unsuiting for continued military service. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 28 June 2002 for review and comment within 30 days. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however,...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00957 INDEX NUMBER: 112.08 XXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Total Active Federal Military Service Date (TAFMSD) be adjusted to 22 Oct 97, the first date he entered active service and that all of his promotion eligibility dates and dates of rank be adjusted...
The applicant filed an appeal with the Evaluation Reports Appeal Board (ERAB) requesting the OPR be removed from his records because the OPR did not reflect an accurate assessment of his work performance. Based on the evidence provided, DPPPE recommends denying the applicant's request. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 02- 00958 in Executive Session on July 2, 2002, under the provisions of AFI...
INDEX CODE: 128.05 AFBCMR 02-00959 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AFBCMR 02-00961 INDEX CODE: 128.05 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: SSAN: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the...
INDEX CODE 112.07 AFBCMR 02-00963 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Members of the Board Mr. Jackson A. Hauslein, Mr. James W. Russell III and Mr. John E. B. Smith considered this application on 20 June 2002. RAYMOND H....
AFBCMR 02-00964 INDEX NUMBER: 128.05 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXXX, XXX-XX-XXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 14 June 2002, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was...
The applicant states he has not participated since June 2001, due to heart surgery, and was never notified of the FSGLI program. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 02- 00968 in Executive Session on 24 July 2002 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Mr. Joseph G. Diamond, Panel Chair Mr. Edward H. Parker, Member Mr. Jackson A. Hauslein, Member The following documentary evidence was...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00973 INDEX CODE: 110.00 APPICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to allow him to enlist in the Army. h. On 4 Jan 96, the applicant failed to complete Volume IV of his CDC's on time and received a letter of reprimand on 7 Feb 96. i. ...
On 25 Apr 02, HQ AFPC/DPPRSP advised the applicant that his WD AGO Form 53-55, Enlistment Record and Report of Separation, Honorable Discharge, was administratively corrected to reflect his POW status from 18 Nov 44 – 26 May 45 and award of the POW Medal and Distinguished Unit Citation. The FY97 NDAA designated those members interned in Siberia as eligible for the POW Medal and a $2.50 daily subsistence allowance. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00975 INDEX CODE: 108.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: Not Indicated _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: It appears that the applicant is requesting that item 11C of his DD Form 214, be changed to reflect medical disability rather than physical disability. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted...
INDEX CODE: 137.04 AFBCMR 02-00977 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
In this case this date would have been 19 Sep 01. He filed this application first, because due to a late OPR his senior rater screened an incomplete record and second, the selection board screened an incomplete record. In this respect, we note that in accordance with applicable Air Force instructions, the OPR closing on 21 Jul 01 was not required to be on file at AFPC until after the date the ISS selection board adjourned.
He also provides official correspondence indicating he was recommended for a field appointment to WOJG, that he had been the acting WOJG, and had been presented a bar to wear while in that position until his appointment was approved. Personnel orders from the 345th Airdrome Squadron, dated 15 Aug 45, reflect the applicant was acting in the position of WOJG. If the Board approves relief, his record should reflect he was appointed to WOJG and was discharged in that grade on 16 Jan 46.
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at Exhibit A. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the...
The members of the Board, Messrs. Philip Sheuerman, Billy C. Baxter, and James W. Russell III, considered this application on 29 May 2002. PHILIP SHEUERMAN Panel Chair Attachment: Ltrs, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 13 May 02, w/atch AFBCMR 02-00984 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for...
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director or his designee. Members of the Board Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Mr. John B. Hennessey, and Mr. Michael Maglio considered this application on 5 June 2002. THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ Vice Chair Attachment: Ltr, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 3 May 02, with attachment AFBCMR 02-00985 INDEX CODE: 128.05 MEMORANDUM...
INDEX CODE: 121.03 AFBCMR 02-00986 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
Members of the Board Mr. Lawrence R. Leehy, Mr. Clarence D. Long III, and Ms. Ann-Cecile McDermott, considered this application on 6 June 2002. LAWRENCE R. LEEHY Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 13 May 02 AFBCMR 02-00987 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS states that they believe the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE states that the Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 2B, “separated with a general or under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge” is correct. We took notice of the applicant's...
He received an RE Code of 2C, which defined means "Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service " The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommends the...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00998 INDEX CODE 135.02 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be awarded three points for the retirement/retention year ending (RYE) 8 April 1999 so that it will be a satisfactory year of Federal service for retirement. After a thorough and careful review of the evidence of record and...
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His medical retirement should include all the medical conditions that he suffered while he was on active duty, not just those that rendered him unfit for further military service. The service medical record clearly documents problems with his neck and left shoulder since he entered the Air Force. His neck and shoulder condition did not render him unfit for continued military service and was not rated...
INDEX CODE 128.02 AFBCMR 02-01002 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Members of the Board Mr. Jackson A. Hauslein, Mr. James W. Russell III and Mr. John E. B. Smith considered this application on 20 June 2002. RAYMOND H....
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPP stated that the applicant had continuous active duty in the Air Force from 30 Aug 51 through 31 Oct 67. The applicant has provided a Special Order that assigns the other E-6 (the one who was...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01010 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. We also find insufficient evidence to warrant a recommendation that the discharge be upgraded on the basis of clemency. ...
He retired effective 1 February 2002 and is currently receiving retired pay. By law, once a member completes 20 years of TAFMS and applies for retired pay, the RCSBP election is no longer valid and the member must make an SBP election. However, he did receive SBP cost information when he elected RCSBP coverage in 1986.
AFBCMR 02-01016 INDEX CODE: 112.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief...
AFBCMR 02-01018 INDEX CODE: 137.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT, SSN Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
The applicant submitted a copy of a 11 Jun 92 letter from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) reflecting the service member elected her as his beneficiary and that she would be entitled to a survivor's annuity. The service member and the applicant's 20 Jun 00 divorce decree incorporated the previous property settlement, but specified that the benefit was incorrectly identified as "military retirement" and should reflect the service member's "Civil Service Retirement benefits." If the...
Members of the Board Ms. Olga M. Crerar, Mr. George Franklin, and Mr. Charlie E. Williams Jr. considered this application on 11 June 2002. OLGA M. CRERAR Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 16 May 02, with attachment AFBCMR 02-01022 INDEX CODE: 128.05 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the...
AFBCMR 02-01032 INDEX CODE: 112.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief...
AFBCMR 02-01033 Index Number: 112.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum...
INDEX CODE: 128.05 AFBCMR 02-01034 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
INDEX CODE: 128.05 AFBCMR 02-01035 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
Members of the Board Mr. Lawrence R. Leehy, Ms. Diane Arnold, and Mr. E. David Hoard, considered this application on 11 July 2002. LAWRENCE R. LEEHY Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 19 Jun 02 AFBCMR 02-01038 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military...
INDEX CODE: 128.05 AFBCMR 02-01040 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the Enlisted Performance Report, AF Form 910, rendered for the period 24 July 1997 through 11 December 1998, be declared void and removed from her records. ROSCOE HINTON JR. Panel Chair AFBCMR 02-01041 MEMORANDUM...
INDEX CODE: 135.02 AFBCMR 02-01044 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01045 INDEX CODE: 108.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The reason for her discharge be changed from misconduct to reflect that she was discharged for medical reasons. In regard to the request for her records to be changed to reflect that she was discharged for medical reasons; no evidence...
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE states the RE code the applicant received is the appropriate code for those members separated "involuntarily with an honorable discharge or an entry level separation without characterization of service (Exhibit D). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 24 May 2002, for...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01050 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM), fourth oak leaf cluster (4OLC), awarded on occasion of her retirement from the Air Force, be upgraded to a Meritorious Service Medal (MSM). She finds it shameful that after all she had done for...
He was given a Reentry Code of “2Q,” “personnel medically retired or discharged” and a Separation Code of “JFL,” “involuntary discharge directed by established directive (No entitlements) for a physical disability which existed prior to entry on active duty, during a break in service, or during a period of inactive service, and was established by a physical evaluation board.” The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the evaluations prepared by the...
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director of the Board or his designee. MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, HQ AFPC/DPPAOO, dtd 18 Jul 02 AFBCMR 02-01054 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the...
On 5 Jun 00, the 33rd Flying Training Squadron commander recommended the applicant be disenrolled from SUPT, not be considered for reinstatement at a later date, and not be considered for undergraduate navigator training. The instructor did not indicate this was mandated by Air Force instruction, which at the time of the incident he had not completely read. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01069 INDEX NUMBER: 131.01 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: Yes APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered for promotion to colonel by Special Selection Board (SSB) by the CY01B (3 Dec 01) central colonel selection board with the following corrections made to his Officer Selection Brief (OSB): 1. d. Insert “T” prefix on the DAFSC for the entries effective 17...
Applicant submitted a similar request to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB); however, since his discharge occurred over 15 years ago, his request was returned without action and he was advised to submit his current appeal to the Board. The applicant did not submit any new evidence of identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge processing, and provided no facts warranting an upgrade of his discharge. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting...
The members of the Board, Mr. Lawrence R. Leehy, Mr. Clarence D. Long III, and Ms. Ann-Cecile McDermott, considered this application on 6 June 2002. LAWRENCE R. LEEHY Panel Chair Attachment: Ltrs, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 21 May 02, w/atch AFBCMR 02-01073 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board...