Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director or his designee. Members of the Board Mr. Roscoe Hinton Jr., Mr. Mike Novel, and Mr. Thomas J. Topolski Jr. considered this application on 19 June 2002. ROSCOE HINTON JR. Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 1 Jun 02, with attachment AFBCMR 02-01175 INDEX CODE: 100.03 MEMORANDUM FOR...
___________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 14 March 2000, applicant was appointed 2nd Lieutenant, Reserve of the Air Force, Nurse Corps. She was promoted to the grade of First Lieutenant, with a DOR of 25 May 01. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the...
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Due to timing of the Logistics Squadron Commander’s Board, the events of 11 Sep 01, and erroneous advice from his commander, the CY01B lieutenant colonel selection board was not aware that he was on the Logistics Squadron Commander’s list. Notwithstanding the timing of his board and the advice given by his commander, the applicant was considered for promotion based on his complete record of...
In 1996 and 1997, she was awarded a Definitely Promote (DP) recommendation in both of her below-the-zone (BPZ) considerations for promotion to lieutenant colonel. In support of her appeal, her senior rater states that "her PRF omitted selection for Senior Service School and command. It only reflects job performance for the final 5 months of consolidation and deactivation from August 1997 to February 98.
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Title 38 U.S.C., Section 1965(5)(B) and Section 1967(a) states that a member who is assigned to a participating position shall be automatically insured under SGLI for an automatic coverage for $250,000, unless the member reduces or declines coverage. They indicated that Title 38 U.S.C., Section 1965(5)(B) and Section 1967(a) states that a member who is assigned to a participating position shall...
INDEX CODE: 121.03 AFBCMR 02-01186 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for...
Her case was presented before an evaluation officer who recommended that she be discharged from the Air Force and provided a general discharge. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS reviewed applicant's request and recommends denial. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 May 02.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01193 INDEX CODE: 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code and narrative reason for separation be changed. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01199 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: DVA HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive award of the Purple Heart (PH) Medal. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an...
Without any documentation pertaining to the applicant's military service, or that he was injured as a direct result of enemy action, DPPPR can not verify his eligibility for the Purple Heart. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the evaluation and stated that he signed his DD Form 214, dated 21 August 1952 without reading it and it is inaccurate. There was no evidence presented, other than his...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force (Exhibit C). The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) package shows that the applicant requested a discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial. _________________________________________________________________ The following...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force (Exhibit C). Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board...
Based on the evidence provided, they recommend the applicant's request to be considered for promotion by a special selection board be denied A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR STAFF EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 21 Jun 02, for review and response within 30 days. After reviewing the evidence of record, we are persuaded the...
Submission of the original on the indicated 30 Nov 01 date would have been in sufficient time to process the nomination even if the fax copy had been misrouted or not sent. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT to include the attached Promotion Recommendation Form, AF Form 709, signed by General Scott, be considered for promotion to the grade...
AFBCMR 02-01219 INDEX NUMBER: 112.02 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01220 INDEX CODE 137.02 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No ____________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he filed a timely election for termination of spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) before the first anniversary of his remarriage and be relieved from the SBP premium debt. ...
Members of the Board Mr. Roscoe Hinton Jr., Mr. Mike Novel and Mr. Thomas J. Topolski Jr. considered this application on June 19, 2002. ROSCOE HINTON JR. Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, ARPC/SG, dtd May 15, 2002, w/Atch AFBCMR 02-01221 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction...
AFBCMR 02-01223 INDEX CODE: 121.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant served on active duty as an enlisted member from 19 May 1993 through 14 November 2001, when he was discharged to accept a commission. A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant stated he provided a dated document showing the SAEMR annotated on his...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01229 INDEX CODE: 113.04 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Joint Specialized Undergraduate Pilot Training (JSUPT) Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) be reduced from ten (10) years to eight (8) years; and, that the start date of his ADSC be changed from Mar 01 to Jan 99. He was cleared...
The evidence he has provided proves he does not have a personality disorder. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The AFBCMR Medical Consultant recommends that the applicant’s narrative reason for discharge be changed to Secretarial...
Members of the Board, Mr. Roscoe Hinton Jr., Mr. Mike Novel, and Mr. Thomas J. Topolski, Jr., considered this application on 19 June 2002. ROSCOE HINTON JR. Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 1 Jun 02, w/atchs AFBCMR 02-01234 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for...
AFBCMR 02-01235 INDEX CODE: 112.07 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: SSAN: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the...
Members of the Board Mr. Joseph A. Roj, Mr. Christopher Carey, and Mr. John B. Hennessey, considered this application on 2 July 2002. JOSEPH A. ROJ Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 16 Jun 02 AFBCMR 02-01236 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military...
INDEX CODE 112.07 128.05 AFBCMR 02-01237 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Members of the Board Mr. Jackson A. Hauslein, Mr. James W. Russell III and Mr. John E. B. Smith considered this application on 20 June 2002. RAYMOND...
INDEX CODE: 112.00 AFBCMR 02-01238 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
INDEX CODE 112.07 128.05 AFBCMR 02-01240 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Members of the Board Mr. Jackson A. Hauslein, Mr. James W. Russell III and Mr. John E. B. Smith considered this application on 20 June 2002. RAYMOND...
A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states General S, states in an Army Air Force (AAF) Letter 35-77 dated 29 May 1946, that there is no rank of flight officers in the AAF reserve. Notwithstanding this, no evidence has been presented to show the applicant applied for a commission as required by the regulations of that time. Exhibit B.
At the time of his retirement, he had completed a total of 20 years and 29 days of active service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRRP recommends the application be denied. However, we agree with the opinion and...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01246 INDEX CODE: 135.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded a good year for the Retention/Retirement (R/R) year April 1997 - April 1998 so he may receive a 15-year retirement. While we are not unsympathetic to the applicant’s circumstances, in the absence of evidence indicating he...
His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, reflects that he was honorably discharged on 12 April 2000, under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, by reason of unsatisfactory performance, and was issued an RE Code of 2C. However, his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, reflects that he was honorably discharged on 12 April 2000, under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, by reason of unsatisfactory performance. ...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01248 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. They concluded that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge...
The Board was persuaded by the letters of support the applicant provided from other members of the aircrew on the flight that he sustained injuries. Therefore, the Board recommends that the applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 19 Jul 02.
He received an LOR on 7 Apr 82 for failing to report for duty on 3 April 82. On 17 May 83, after consulting with counsel, the applicant requested discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that his UOTHC discharge should be upgraded to honorable or general.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01253 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His discharge be upgraded to honorable. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt their rationale as the...
As a result, you were disenrolled from the Security Forces technical training course on 18 October 2001. However, after reviewing the applicant’s request and the evidence of record, we find the narrative reason for his entry level separation; i.e., entry level performance and conduct, to be inaccurate. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be...
Service members' entire OSR is evaluated by the central boards. Based on the evidence provided they recommend the applicant's request to be considered for promotion by a special selection board be denied A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR STAFF EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 14 Jun 02, for review and response within 30 days. ...
The brief contains information that will be on the OSB at the central board. A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR STAFF EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 16 August 2002, for review and response within 30 days. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record, we are not sufficiently persuaded that the applicant should be...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 02-01257 INDEX CODE 131.05 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her time spent completing her degree on the Educational Delay Program (EDP) be recalculated to provide 100% credit so that her date of rank (DOR) to second lieutenant (2LT) would be 9 Jun 00, rather than 12 Feb 01. A complete copy of...
The applicant, while serving in the grade of airman basic, was discharged from the Air Force on 24 April 1959 under the provisions of AFR 39-17 (Unfitness) and received an under other than honorable conditions discharge. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS states that they believe the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. Exhibit B.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01259 INDEX CODE 137.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to establish Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage for his wife. The member's claim that he signed an "AF Form 10" requesting SBP coverage for his wife prior to retirement is without merit, since the form used to make an SBP...
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to applicant on 21 Aug 02 for review and response. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01267 INDEX CODE: 110.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge be upgraded to an honorable conditions discharge. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLSA/JAJM states that applicant was court-martialed for...
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at Exhibit A. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The commander advised the applicant that if his recommendation was approved, his discharge would be described as an uncharacterized entry-level discharge and he would be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS states that they believe the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation at the time of his discharge from active duty. A...
Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPW recommends that the applicant’s lost time remain on his DD Form 214. Lost time must be recorded on the DD Form 214 for members who have had lost time during an enlistment, even if the applicant has made all the lost time good.
DPPPEP stated that, during the contested reporting period, the applicant received a Letter of Counseling (LOC), dated 30 Dec 99, and a Letter of Reprimand (LOR), dated 22 Jun 00, for “isolated incidents.” DPPPEP referenced the decision of the Evaluation Reports Appeal Board (ERAB), which states that “Evaluators are obligated to consider incidences, their frequency, and periods of substandard performance.” DPPPEP stated that the additional rater’s comments in Section VI of the...
INDEX CODE: 112.07 AFBCMR 02-01282 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant states that the records document a Bipolar Disorder and Schizotypal Personality Disorder existing prior to service that interfered with the applicant’s duty performance. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE states that based on the documentation the RE code the applicant received at the time of separation is correct. We took notice of...