RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01128
INDEX CODES: 100.05, 111.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) be corrected to reflect his
current level of Professional Military Education.
Her Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) be corrected to reflect “43D3.”
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or
unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the
letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force.
Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in this Record of
Proceedings.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
ARPC/DPB reviewed this application and recommended denial. A complete
copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Applicant reviewed the advisory opinion and furnished a response which
is attached at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. After careful consideration of
applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find
insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective
action. The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear
to be based on the evidence of record and have not been adequately
rebutted by applicant. Absent persuasive evidence applicant was
denied rights to which entitled, appropriate regulations were not
followed, or appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis
to disturb the existing record.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 02-
01128 in Executive Session on 18 Jun 02, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
Mr. Joseph A. Roj, Panel Chair
Mr. E. David Hoard, Member
Mr. William H. Anderson, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 15 Apr 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, ARPC/DPB, dated 8 May 02.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 May 02.
Exhibit D. Letter, applicant, dated 5 Jun 02.
JOSEPH A. ROJ
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03392
After reviewing the comments provided by the Air Force, we are persuaded that the OPR closing 9 May 2001 should have been in his records at the time the FY03 board convened. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, to include the Officer Performance Report for the period 10 May 2000 through 9 May 2001, be considered for promotion to the grade of...
In support of his request applicant provided a personal statement, a letter transferring him to the honorary Air Reserve, his promotion recommendation letter, and his Officer Reserve Corps appointment letter. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03168
The applicant filed an appeal with the Evaluation Reports Appeal Board, which denied her request. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In her response to the Air Force evaluations, the applicant provides specific examples that she indicates cause the contested OPR to be in violation of Air Force Instruction 36-2406. In her response to the Air Force evaluation, the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-00078
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: When he remarried on 12 Mar 99, he advised ARPC of his change in marital status and was never counseled by ARPC that he had a year to cancel his SBP benefit coverage on his new spouse. Member stated he contacted ARPC after his remarriage and was not counseled that he had one year to cancel his RCSBP benefit. The ARPC/DPS evaluation is at Exhibit...
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: When he remarried on 12 Mar 99, he advised ARPC of his change in marital status and was never counseled by ARPC that he had a year to cancel his SBP benefit coverage on his new spouse. Member stated he contacted ARPC after his remarriage and was not counseled that he had one year to cancel his RCSBP benefit. The ARPC/DPS evaluation is at Exhibit...
Submission of the original on the indicated 30 Nov 01 date would have been in sufficient time to process the nomination even if the fax copy had been misrouted or not sent. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT to include the attached Promotion Recommendation Form, AF Form 709, signed by General Scott, be considered for promotion to the grade...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00850 INDEX CODE: 102.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of rank (DOR) to the Air Force Reserve grade of major be adjusted to reflect the time he served in the Army Reserve as a major. This credit reflected his prior commissioned service with the Army and Army Reserve, and his...
INDEX CODE: 111.05, 131.01 AFBCMR 02-01597 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set...
_________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Her senior raters were never contacted to prepare Promotion Recommendation Forms (PRFs) for the SRBs; she was never provided an opportunity to review her Officer Selection Brief (OSB) for the FY97 SRB; and, the OSB for the FY98 SRB was incomplete. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant’s states that...
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the Enlisted Performance Report, AF Form 910, rendered for the period 24 July 1997 through 11 December 1998, be declared void and removed from her records. ROSCOE HINTON JR. Panel Chair AFBCMR 02-01041 MEMORANDUM...