The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-0 19 19 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: records of the Department of the Air Force relating t e corrected to show that that...
The decision of the AFDRB was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Available Master Personnel Records C. AFDRB Brief D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding AFDRB Brief D E P A R T M E N T OF THE A I R F O R C E H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR F O R C E P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R R A N D O L P H AIR F O R C E B A S E T E X A S JUL 0 6 1998 MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ AFPCDPPRS 550 C Street West Ste 11 Randolph AFB TX 78 150-47 13 SUBJECT: Application for Correction of Military...
Attachment: Ltr, AFPClDPPPW, dtd 15 Sep 98 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, D. C. NOV 19 1998 Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01940 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinent military...
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01942 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO - I#(rJ1%19ss APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be permitted to make an election to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCS'BP) . A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C . We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion...
The appropria-te Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Personnel who were assigned or attached members of units during the period for which campaign participation credit or assault landing credit was accorded to the unit are awarded the bronze service star and arrowhead, respectively, to denote their participation in the action. Personnel who were assigned or attached unit members...
Upon implementation of DOD Directive 1310.1, Rank and Seniority of Commissioned Officers, effective 1 Oct 96, all reserve officers on the Reserve Active Status List in transition from the reserves to active duty, would retain the date of rank they held in their reserve unit. Sections 12207, 12320, 14002, 14003, and 143 17 of reference (b) to establish policies governing the determination of the dates of rank and precedence of commissioned offi- cers on the Reserve Active Status List. at...
A complete copy of their evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to applicant on 24 Aug 98 for review and response. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that he should be given the requested relief. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPPOC, dated 31 Jul 98.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinions appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). requesting one year of service credit be granted for his professional years required for one year of service credit. Service Credit For Line Of The Air Force, Chaplain, Judge Advocate, And Air Force General Counsel’s Honors Program Officers.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The records indicate member’s military service was reviewed and appropriate action was taken. Applicant did not identi@ any specific errors in the discharge processing nor provide facts which warrant an upgrade of the discharge he received.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant’s request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinions D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinions E. Applicant’s Response D E P A R T M E N T OF T H E A I R F O R C E H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR FORCE P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R R A N D O L P H AIR FORCE B A S E TEXAS AUG 3 11998 MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ AFPCDPPRS 550 C...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01992 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His retirement grade be changed to technical sergeant (TSgt). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief Inquiries/AFBCMR Section, Enlisted Promotion & Mil Testing Branch, AFPC/DPPPWB, reviewed the...
CORRECTED DIRECTIVE DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC September 4, 1998 I Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01993 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: ords of the Department of the Air Force...
DPPPA indicated that even though the AFCM (4OLC) citation was not on file for review by the CY98B Major Board, it was present on the OSB and, therefore, was in evidence before the board. According to DPPPA, the decoration citation was filed in the applicant’s OSR on 7 Aug 98. A complete copy of the DPPPA evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant indicated that during a counseling...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-02006 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR --.- 4 Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the...
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and AFI 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: itary records of the Department of the Air Force relating t e corrected to show that on 25 May 1998, he elected spo coverage, under the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan, based on full...
Due to the fact that the member was assigned to the Nonobligated-Nonparticipating Ready Personnel Section (NNRPS), HQ ARPC/DPJA was responsible for notifying the applicant of the board convening dates. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicant’s contentions, it appears the applicant was unaware that he would be competing for promotion at the FY97 and FY98 Air Force Reserve Major Boards. We believe this action is required in order to provide him with an...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Applicant’s master personnel record does not contain the discharge case file however, his DD Form 2 14 indicates his discharge was for misconduct- sexual deviation. Applicant did not identi@ any specific errors in the discharge processing nor provide facts which warrant an upgrade of the discharge he received over 15 years ago and...
Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-02024 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: artment of the Air The pertinen be corrected to Force relating to show that on 20 N advance payments of Overseas Housing...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-02033 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Recor 3 s is announced, and it is 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of e above regulation, the directed that: records of the Department of the Air Force relating to corrected to show that eleven...
Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 31 Aug 98 D E P A R T M E N T OF T H E AIR FORCE H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR F O R C E P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R R A N D O L P H AIR F O R C E B A S E T E X A S MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ AFPCDPPRS 550 C Street West, Suite 11 Randolph AFB TX 78150-4713 SUBJECT: Application for Correction of Military R e c o r d 1 The applicant, while serving in the grade of senior Airman, was discharged from the Air Force on 21 Jun 96 under the provisions of AFI 36-3208...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-02045 September 10, 1998 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: records of the Department of the Air Force relating to e corrected to show that: a. w/Atch Ltr, HQ AFPC/DPAMP, dtd Aug 11, U V / U ~ /...
The applicant has failed to provide any information/support from the rating chain on the contested EPR. The applicant contends that the contested report was rendered as a direct result of an Article 15. MARTHA MAUST ' P a n e l C h a i r 7 t DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC mice of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-02061 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant's response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Commanders’ Programs Branch, HQ AFPC/DPSFC, states the applicant believes he was unjustly charged leave for time spent during the medical clearance process and for time spent awaiting diversion of his assignment. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT,...
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 15 July 1998. The decision of the AFDRB was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant ' s request 2nd the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
In regard to applicant's request that a PME statement be added on the OPR, closing 26 April 1996, AFPC/DPPPA, states that Central boards evaluate the entire officer selection record (OSR) (including the promotion recommendation form, OPRs, officer effectiveness reports, training reports, letters of evaluation, decorations, and officer selection brief), assessing whole person factors such as job performance, professional qualities, depth and breadth of experience, leadership, and academic and...
, DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE I WASHINGTON, DC SEP 0 1 Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-02104 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Ti'tle 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinen- Force relating td show that: i-- - - a. R MOND H. W LLER d...
1 7 , an officer who fails to withdraw a declination statement and accept promotion after four months from the date the declination statement was signed, will be removed from the promotion list. A complete copy of the Air Force eval.uation is attached at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states that he request his case be dismissed on the grounds that the 14 September 1998 SSB has already convened. On 13 February...
Attachment: Ltr, HQ AFPC/DPSFC, dtd 4 August 1 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98- 02117 SEP 14 5996 .. >- MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: a. He was not...
e AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: -- DOCKET NUMBER: 98-02124 DEC 1 1 1998 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration for promotion to the grade of major for the Calendar Year (CY) 1998B major central selection board with inclusion of the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) awarded in April 1998 on his officer selection brief (OSB). He also requests removal of an...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-02 13 1 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and AFI 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: ry records of the Department of the Air Force relating t be corrected to show that he was not...
The AETCI, dated 14 Apr 95, stated that prior service personnel enlisting as recruiters would retain the DOR held on their previous enlistment. On 30 Jan 96, HQ AFRSRSO released a PROMIS message correcting the policy on recruiter enlistees to coincide with the policy for other prior-service accessions (the revised AETCI 36-2002, published 1 Oct 97, reflects the change). Applicant provides copies of his enlistment order (SO 145-5) reflecting his enlistment DOR as 20 Jul95, an amendment to...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-02135 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinen tment of the Air be corrected to Force relating to vance payments...
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant ' s request on 21 Jul 98 (Exhibit C ) . forwarded to this Board After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Loeb, Member, considered this application on 21 January 1999 in accordance with the Drovisions of Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and the Exhibits : A.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC 9 1998 Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-02 146 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: cords of the Department of the Air Force relating e corrected to show that he...
above ‘regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: Force relating to q » be corrected to show that 11.5 days of leave be added to hee leave balance commencing 1 October 1998. ' recommendation of the Air Force’ and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant thas been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Applicant had.56.5 days on-1 Oct 96, earned 30 days, and used 15...
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant I s request on 17 July 1998 (Exhibit C). The AFDRB Brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC AUG 11 1998 Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-02172 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinen Force relating to show that on 15 April 1998, he was...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC OCT 2 11998 Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-02179 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air be corrected...
7 L ~ d Q ~ ~ L DONNA PITTENGER Chief Examiner Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-02200 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carehlly reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. By...
Applicant was considered and not selected for promotion to the grade of major by the CY98B board which convened on 6 April 1998. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states that the MSM paperwork was submitted in January 1998; the MSM was signed by General B--- on 6 April 1998 the first day of the board; the...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, D.C. Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-02223 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and AFI 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: ary records of the Department of the Air Force relating t be corrected to show that he was credited...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-02229 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: two (2) years. Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 22 Sep 98 Panel Chair D E P A R T M E...
If neither the member nor the former spouse requests the election change within the one-year eligibility period, former spouse coverage may not be established thereafter. Although their 13 Apr 94 divorce terminated the applicant’s eligibility as the spouse beneficiary, the member did not request her coverage be canceled and the SBP premiums continued to be deducted from his retired pay until his 31 Jul 98 death. Discussion: Although the decedent,made no election change during the required...
98-02254 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and AFI 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: commencing 1 October 1998. tary records of the Department of the Air Force relating t corrected to show that 15 days of leave were added to hi DONNA PITTENGER Chief Examiner Air Force...