ZSLJNSEL: None - ZECORD OF PZOZEEDINGS - IN THE MATTER G'F: AIR FORCE EGARD FOR CORREZTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 3CCKET NUMBER: 98-01667 DEC 1 0 G* HEARING DESIRED: NO Applicanz r e q u e s t s award of a? evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opir_:on to the Board recommending the applicacion be denled (Exhiblt : I . The advisory opinion was (Exhibit D) .
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states that it was evident no review of the FY93 0-6 board results took place and the party line of, “the Board uses the whole person concept to make selections” was the basis and mainstay for the denial. It appears the applicant is requesting this Board to...
If neither the member nor the former spouse requests the election change during the one-year eligibility period, former spouse coverage may not be established thereafter. Premiums continue to be deducted from his retired pay erroneously listing the former spouse as the eligible spouse beneficiary. e to former spouse coverage the former spouse beneficiary, PAT PEEK, DAFC Chief, Retiree Services Branch Directorate of Pers Program Mgmt 7 / DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01680 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT : Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Applicant states he didn't realize that his discharge was as bad...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC SEP 16 1998 Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01689 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinen Force relating to show that, upon his accession into...
-- Pdnel C h a i d Attachment: Ltr, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 23 June 1998 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, D. C. Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01690 JUL 2 7 1998 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF .- -- .- Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed...
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant s request on 29 July 1998. (Atch 1-3) Copies of the documents to .be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached. In addition to military counsel, you have the right to employ civilian counsel.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C ) . The advisory opinion was forwarded to counsel and the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant or counsel.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC AUG 2 5 1998 Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01 698 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: records of the Department of the Air Force relating to- e corrected to...
Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01701 JUL 2 8 1998 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Attachment: Ltr, HQ AFPC/DPSFC, dtd 23 June 1998 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, D. C. JUL 2 8 1998 Office of the...
Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01706 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and"having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: rtment of the Air The pertinen be corrected to Force relating to show that she...
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 3AM 1 3 1999 IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01708 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Meritorious Service Medal instead of the Air Force Commendation Medal. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. Board recommends...
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Her deceased husband planned to take his Air Force retirement at age 60. 6 98-01709 On 28 December 1981, ARPC/DPAAR notified the spouse of the deceased member that an RCSBP election had not been received by the deadline and informed her that RCSBP coverage was not in effect and no further election could be made until the member reached age 60. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion...
These documents are appended at Exhibit A. DPPPRA stated that the applicant was discharged on 16 Nov 45 and has not provided any documentation showing he made any effort to resolve the issue of additional oak leaf clusters for his DFC or AM prior to this application. A complete copy of this evaluation is appended at Exhibit C. 2 98-01710 APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He stated that he cannot be held responsible for changes in administrative personnel or priorities during war...
The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinion D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E A I R F O R C E H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR F O R C E P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R R A N D O L P H AIR F O R C E B A S E T E X A S MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ AFPCDPPAE 550 C Street West, Ste 10 Randolph AFB TX 78150-4712 The applicant is requesting his records be...
I DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, D.C. Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-0 1726 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and AFI 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: ords of the Department of the Air Force relating t- corrected to show that he was credited with...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC SEP 1 5 1998 Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01729 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT : Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will...
conditions AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Physical Disability Division, AFPC/DPPD, reviewed this application and recommended denial, stating the applicant has not submitted any material or documentation to show he was improperly rated at the time of his removal from the TDRL and permanent retirement by reason of physical disability. 3 AFBCMR 96-01731 At the time of his disability processing, applicant's degenerative polyneuropathy was associated with his cervical spondylosis, but not separately...
The applicant has not provided any senior rater or management level 3 AFBCMR 95-01732 . A complete copy of the DPPPA evaluation is at Exhibit D. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In a detailed response, counsel indicated that the recommendations for denial were based on the government's assertion that there was insufficient evidence to substantiate that the applicant received "anything but the same fair and equitable treatment in the PRF process that was provided to each 4 AFBCMR...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC SEP 2 3 I998 Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01739 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. It is further directed that, if he is recommended for promotion by the SRB, the Air...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01 742 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United Sta$es Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: , records of the Department of the Air Force relating to- be corrected to show...
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request for an upgrade of his discharge to honorable on 19 January 1982 (Exhibit B). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01763 AUG 2 5 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured the compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinen Force relating to show that on 20 N Overseas Housing Allowance...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C) , The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The applicant is requesting correction to his Officer Selection Brief (OSB) in the areas of Acquisition Corps, Joint Duty History and Decorations. The applicant believes his OSB should have reflected “YES” under the Acquisition Corps area due...
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the applicant provided several supportive statements (Exhibit C). On 15 Jul 54, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant’s request that his general discharge be upgraded to honorable. HENRY C. SAUNDERS Panel Chair AFBCMR 98-01784 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending t h e application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant f o r review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01796- COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MQ 2 7 s988 APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. 98-01796 APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant has provided post-service documentation which is attached at Exhibit E. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. 19 M a r & 1979, American Red Cmss reprsemtive,his authorized...
The AFDRB brief response (Exhibit Board (AFDRB) denied applicant I s In accordance with policy, the .s Board for further consideration was forwarded to applicant for D). Accordingly, applicant's request is denied. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached.
R Cfiief Examiner Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, D. C. Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-0 18 14 S E $ 0 4 1998 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale the victim of either an error or an 2603, the applicant's records will the Chief of Staff signed by the...
Attachment: Ltr, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 9 July 1998 D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E A I R F O R C E H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR FORCE P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R R A N D O L P H AIR FORCE B A S E T E X A S 0 9 JUL 8% MEMORANDUMFOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ AFPCDPPAE 550 C Street West, Ste 10 Randolph AFB TX 78150-4712 SUBJECT: Application for Correction of Military Record I-- The applicant requests a constructive reenlistment to permit retirement the first day of the month following High Year of Tenure...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01820 AUG 2 4.1998 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: f the Air The pertinen Force relating to be corrected to show for...
The appropriate Air Force off ice evaluated applicant I s request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit D). Applicant requests DD Form 214 reflect his Vietnam Service by adding the Vietnam Service Medal and Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal. We recommend disapproval of the applicant’s request for award of the Vietnam Service Medal and Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01829 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinen Force relating to show that nine (9) commencing 1 October 1998. tment of...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C) . The commander advised applicant that if his recommendation is approved, that his discharge would be described as entry level separation and that he would be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force. The records indicate member's military service was reviewed and appropriate action was taken.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01836 AUG '2 I t@j * MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: ent of the Air The pertine corrected Force relating t to show that...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Applicant's response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The records indicate member’s military service was reviewed and appropriate action was taken.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). He received an RE code of “2H: Participating in Track 4 or 5 of the Substance Abuse Reorientation and Treatment (SART) program for drugs, or has failed to complete Track 4.” Applicant’s military personnel records indicate he received a general discharge for “A Pattern of Misconduct - Minor Disciplinary Infractions.” This type of...
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFT 36-2603, t h e applicant’s records will be corrected as s e t f o r t h in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director of the Board or his designee, - - Attachment: ’ L t r , HQ AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 24 July 1998 L, Panel Chair D E P A R T M E N T O F THE A I R F O R C E H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR FORCE P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R R A N D O L P H AIR FORCE B A S E TEXAS MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR 24 JUL...
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered for the period 27 June 1996 through 16 May 1997 was not filed in his Officer Selection Record (OSR) prior to the CY97C board. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Appeals and SSB Branch, Directorate of Personnel Program Management, HQ AFPC/DPPPA, reviewed this application and states that the applicant contends the 16 May 1997 OPR should have been filed in his OSR when the selection board convened in June 1997. We took...
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO: 98-01852 COUNSEL : HEARING DESIRED: NO FFB ' 9 l99F I Applicant requests that his DD Form 214 be amended to reflect the country at the end of each overseas tour ribbon. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the The advisory opinion was application be denied (Exhibit C ) . Applicant requests his DD Form 2 14...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC SEP 1 6 1998 Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 9 8 - 0 1 8 5 9 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinen ent of the Air be corrected to Force relating to iate...
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: After formal selection and official announcement by the Air Force of his promotion to MSgt, his Center Commander informed him of a discrepancy which reverses his promotion selection. A complete copy of their evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the advisory opinion and...
HQ AFPC/JA informally advised the AFBCMR Staff that unless the divorced party can prove, either in a court of the country in which the divorce was obtained or in a United States court, that the foreign divorce was not in compliance with the laws of the foreign country, the divorce cannot be voided. If legally married to the decedent at the time the POA was issued, the applicant should have been entitled to a dependent ID card. The Chief advises that, should the Board grant relief, approval...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The applicant is basing his request for correction of his grade at the time of discharge, 8 Nov 45, on Air Force Reserve Order Number ir Force Reserve Training Center, dated 21 Dec 50. c. The correction of his grade from Private to Corporal 21 Dec 50 while a number of the USAF Reserve, had no relationship at all to the grade he was...
A I R FORCE BOARD FOX ZCRRECTION OF :v A C L ~ V E S t a t u s List from t h e K e t i r e d Reser-T,-e ana a s s i g n e d t o ar, a p p r o p r i a t e Cztegory A o r B ~ G X ~ M L A p p h c a n t ’ s submission IS at E x h i b i t A. The appropriste Air Force of?::? ?vallJstec a p p l x a r L t ’ 5 1 - q u e s t ana p r o v i d e d an a d v i s o r y o p i ~ x x zo the EDard -ecommending t h e a p p l i c a t i o n be d e n i e d (ExhibiL : .
d RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS A R F C'E B IN THE MATTER OF: COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No 3 5 {J(j; '1338 . The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision. Members of the Board Ms. Charlene M. Bradley, Mr. Joseph G. Diamond, and Ms. Patricia D. Vestal considered this application on 8 October 1998 in accordance with the provisions of Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and the governing statute, 10, U.S.C.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinions' to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D ) . Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Chief, Commanders' Programs Branch, HQ AFPC/DPSFC, advises that the applicant states her desires were to sell 30 days upon reenlistment on 1 June 1998. A complete copy of the their evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the advisory opinions and states that she admits that she is guilty of having somewhat of a mental overload during the time she signed...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant-'s request and provided an advisory opinion T O the Board rezommending the application be deniea (Exhibit 1L. The applicant is requesting that his discharge be upgraded to-honorable Basis for Request. He hrther admitted that since Apr 76 he committed consensual homosexual acts with three individuals The board found applicant elisible for discharge and recommended his separation with a discharge under other than honorable conditions The...