DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON, D. C.
Office of the Assistant Secretary
AFBCMR 98-021 34
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Under the authority of Section 1552. Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction
36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the
decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is
directed that:
records of the Department of the Air Force relating t
be corrected to show that his date of rank to the grad
~AYMOND H.' WEL'LER
Chief Examiner
Air Force Board for Correction
of Military Records
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON, D. C.
Office of the Assistant Secretary
AFBCMR 98-02 134
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR
SUBJECT:
Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air
Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been
the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-
2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for
the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director of the Board or his designee.
At tachmen t :
Ltr, AFPUDPPAE, dtd I7 Sep 98
Panel Chair
DEPARTMENT OF THE A I R FORCE
H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR FORCE P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R
R A N D O L P H AIR FORCE B A S E TEXAS
1 7 SEP m3
MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR
FROM: HQ AFPCDPPAE
550 C Street West, Ste 10
Randolph AFB TX 78150-4712
SUBJECT:
Applicant requests his S S g t date of rank @OR) be corrected to reflect the DOR he held
prior to separating from the Regular Air Force (RegAF) on his previous tour. He contends that
he enlisted with the understanding that he would retain his previous S S g t DOR in accordance
with AETCI 36-2002, Recruiting Procedures for the Air Force. The AETCI, dated 14 Apr 95,
stated that prior service personnel enlisting as recruiters would retain the DOR held on their
previous enlistment. On 30 Jan 96, HQ AFRSRSO released a PROMIS message correcting the
policy on recruiter enlistees to coincide with the policy for other prior-service accessions (the
revised AETCI 36-2002, published 1 Oct 97, reflects the change).
Applicant provides copies of his enlistment order (SO 145-5) reflecting his enlistment
DOR as 20 Jul95, an amendment to the orders (1 88-005) correcting enlistment DOR to
1 Nov 86, and a revocation of the amendment (12 1-003). The revocation was apparently
accomplished to bring his DOR into compliance with the new policy.
The summary report of the 25 Feb- 18 Jun 98 IG investigation states, “Paragraph
2.26.13.1 of the 1995 version of AETCI 36-2002 was wrong.” We sought clarification on the
applicability of the change from AFRS personnel assisting with the investigation. They advised
that the PROMIS message applied to all enlistments dating back to the 14 Apr 95 effective date
of the AETCI.
Although we appreciate the efforts of HQ AFRS to ensure the policy change is fairly
applied, we believe the applicant has a valid complaint. The 14 Apr 95 AETCI clearly stated he
would receive his original S S g t DOR, and the PROMIS message was unclear on the applicability
plicant’s request to restore his SS5 DOR
of the change. We
of 1 Nov 86. POC I
Chief, Skills MaAgement Branch
Dir of Pers Program Management
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Inquiries/AFBCMR Section, AFPC/DPPPWB, reviewed this application and indicated that the contested report would normally have been eligible for promotion consideration for the 96E7 cycle to master sergeant (promotions effective Aug 96 - Jul 97). Consequently, he was ineligible for promotion consideration for the 96B7 cycle based on both the referral EPR and the PES Code “Q”. Even if the board directs removal of the referral report, the applicant would not...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 84-01831 FEB a 8 I999 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: .. a n The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air , be...
In summary, no senior rater, no MLRB President, no central selection board, and no -special selection board has ever reviewed his CY90 (1 year BPZ)"records that included the revised CY89 ( 2 year BPZ) PRF. Based on the SRR review of his PO589 PRF and subsequent upgrade, the applicant was considered and not selected for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by SSB for the CY89A Board. Based on upon a senior rater review (SRR) of his previous CY89 (1 5 May 89) lieutenant colonel...
c. Applicant signed an Enlistment Agreement (AF Form 3006) =on I1 Sep 95, which clearly stated: “My enlistment in the Regular Air Force is for 4 years of active duty. 104-106, g602(cKdX1), :torily: Reserve enlisted :e not as a result of the i the Air Force described in tion 8914 of this title shall ade in which the member in the case of a member of ber served on full-time Na- ermined by the Secretary of : enlisted member who- 1520 i 1521 CH. Higher grade after 30 years of service: warrant...
On 13 Jan 97, the applicant's commander notified him of his intent to recommend to the demotion authority that he be demoted. On 4 Sep 97, the applicant's commander requested that the applicant original rank be restored, which the demotion authority approved. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant indicated that he has requested the Board adjust his DOR because there are currently no options for a commander to suspend demotion in an administrative demotion action.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 97-00826 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF’ OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: 1996. ent of the Air Force be considered for ection Board for the nvened on 9 September Director Air Force Review Boards Agency U AIR FORCE BOARD FOR...
If neither the member nor former spouse requests the election change during the one-year eligibility period, former spouse coverage may not be established thereafter. Thus, even though a member may not have notified the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) of the divorce and continued to pay premiums for spouse coverage after the divorce, the former spouse is not eligible for annuity payments upon the member's death. Recommendation: Although there is no evidence of Air Force...
Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-0 1 104 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and AFI 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: Larch 1998; and competent authority approved his DD Form 2278, Application for Do-It-Yourself P I T Y ) Move and Counseling Checklist, dated...
/ $ / & YMOND H. WELLER Chief Examiner Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 97-02814 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT : ssAN:- # Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. ...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-02 13 1 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and AFI 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: ry records of the Department of the Air Force relating t be corrected to show that he was not...