DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, D.C. Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-02258 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and AFI 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: ry records of the Department of the A r Force relating t corrected to show that 14 days of leave...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-02262 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinen Force relating to show that on 31 July 1997 he was honorably discharged...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinion D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E A I R F O R C E H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR FORCE P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R R A N D O L P H AIR FORCE B A S E...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, D. C. OCT 2 11998 Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-0227 1 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: records of the Department of the Air Force relating t be corrected to...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC D&C 1 4 1998 Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-0228 1 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority.of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: records of the Department of the Air Force relating t e corrected to...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-02307 DEC 1 8 1998 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinen Force relating to show that on 30 N Separation Date was...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-02322 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinen ment of the Air Force relating to be corrected to show that on 20...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C) . Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the application was filed. The applicant is requesting his uncharacterized character of service be changed to honorable.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 1 December 1995. The AFDRB brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D) . ) After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, D.C. Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-02349 5 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and AFI 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: cords of the Department of the Air Force relating e corrected to show that he was credited with...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINC$TON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-02358 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertine Force relating t corrected to sho Mandatory Separation Date was approved...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC OCT 9 1998 Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98- 02359 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36- 2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinen Force relating to show that five ( 5 account...
HQ AFPC/DPPRS further states that although documentation of the C-141 counseling does not exist and applicant indicates he was never informed about the five-year ADSC, they believe it is a reasonable presumption that he was in fact aware of the ADSC which would be incurred. Applicant contends that he was verbally counseled that no ADSC would be incurred beyond 31 March 2000 for training in the C- 141; that no Air Force Form 63 or counseling to the contrary occurred; and that, after the...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC OCT 2 2 1998 Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-02366 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinent m rtment of the Air be corrected to Force relating...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. There are no legal errors requiring correction, and the applicant has failed to provide a sufficient basis for upgrading his bad conduct discharge to the...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The commander advised applicant that if his recommendation is approved, that his discharge would be described as entry level separation and that he would be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force. The records indicate member’s military service was reviewed and appropriate action was taken.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-02396 I MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: of the Air The pertinen be corrected Force relating to arged and on to show that on...
Therefore, the available documentation will be used this Record of Proceedings. The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant fclr review and response (Exhibit D I . Accordingly, applicant's request IS denied.
The AFDRB brief was forwarded to the applicant for - review and response (Exhibit D) . After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. the Board Mrs. Barbara A .
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC DEC I. Executive Director Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC DEC I 11998 Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-02443 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force Evaluation and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC BEC 1 8 1998 Office of the Assistant Secretary
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-02461 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured the compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinent Force relating to show that on 20 N Overseas Housing Allowance (OHA)...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-02465 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and AFI 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: records of the Department of the Air Force relating t be corrected to show that: a,. He was not...
Attachment: Ltr, HQ USAF/DPRC dtd Sep 12, 1 9 9 8 , w/Atch DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC 12 September 1998 MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: AF/DPRC SUBJECT: ection of Military Records-- This responds to a request for a BCMR advisory o records be changed to show he was due reimbursement fo (OHA) under a different, higher, OHA rate ceiling than the one he was under while assigned to Osan AB, Korea. This caused problems for many military members...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-02485 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: nt of the Air The pertinen Force relating to be corrected de at the time to show...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, D.C. Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-025 13 \ MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and AFI 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: records of the Department of the Air Force relating td 1".~-_1_- gertinent military Sgparation...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-02514 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: the The pertinen Force relating to show that five (5) days of leave be added to his leave...
Applicant's military personnel records are not available. Therefore, the facts surrounding his separation from the Air Force cannot be verified. The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Restore 8.5 days leave he will lose at FY98 year-end. Applicant had 39.5 days on 1 Oct 97, earned 30, used 1 day in FY98, and will have 68.5 days on 30 Sep 98. Applicant states he has been unable to use leave due to Undergraduate Pilot Training, Air Force Water Survival Training, and Pilot Instructor Training.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC QCT 2 3 I998 Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 9 8 - 0 2 5 3 6 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 3 6 - 2 6 0 3 , and having assured compliance with the provisions Qf the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinen rtment of the Air be corrected to Force...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Oftice of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-02538 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinen Force relating to that eleven (11) balance. Office of the Assistant...
A I R FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDIKGS DOCKET KZ4BER: 98-02574 * IN THE MATTER OF: Applicant requests her late husband's DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report sf Transfer or Discharge, Block 5a: Grade, Rate or Rank, be changed from A1C to S G T . The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opixion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded...
4 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-02601 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinent mil' Force relating to show that his lett Central Selection removed...
Rather than change member’s PDD and RNLTD, the MPF erroneously amended member’s PCS orders to reflect TDY en route. Member d 8 August 1998 and proceeded to her new permanent duty station ar signature on the attached DD Form 1840 (Atch 1) confirms that she was in the area of her new permanent duty on 13 August 1998, the date her household goods were delivered. A PCS cannot be continued, nor can a PCS order be amended to change the permanent duty station after the RNLTD.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC DEC 1.8 1998 Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98- 02662 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Cude'and Air Force Instruction 36- 2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinen Force relating to. The ten (10) month extension of his...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary A FB CMR 9 8 - 0 2 6 6 7 ?vEMORANDUM FOR THE C H I E F O F STAFF 'ilnder t h e authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United StaEes Code and Air Force Instruction 3 6 - 2 6 0 3 , and having assured zompliance with the provisions of the above regulazion, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: pertinent military records of the DeDartmpnt of...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant's response to the advisory opinions is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The applicant’s complete submission is attached at Exhibit A. In a letter, dated 19 September 1945, the Director, Supply and Services, recommended the applicant be considered for promotion to the grade of captain. On 1 October 1945, a Recommendation for Promotion of Officer (WD AGO Form 78), dated 1 October 1945, was initiated which recommended the applicant’s promotion to the grade of captain.
In support of his request, the applicant submits a personal statement and copies of his internment papers, dated 20 Jun 44, showing his grade as sergeant, Special Orders #121, dated 1 Dec 44, showing his grade at release from Sweden as private, his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Report and Report of Separation) and his discharge certificate (Exhibit A). The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared...
Evidently, her squadron commander either changed his mind about recommending her, or his commander believed an award was not warranted at the time, or both. _________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD: A majority of the panel finds insufficient evidence of error or injustice and recommends the application be denied. A majority found that applicant had not provided sufficient evidence of error or injustice and recommended the case be denied.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficie nt evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Awards and Decorations Section, Promotion, Evaluation, & Recognition Division, HQ AFPC/DPPPR, reviewed this application and states that without documentation showing the applicant actually accomplished the TDY to Saudi Arabia during January through May 1994, they can not verify his eligibility for the SWASM with 1 Bronze Service Star. Exhibit B. VAUGHN E. SCHLUNZ Panel Chair AFBCMR...
On 8 Dec 60, the Air Force Discharge Review Board considered and denied the applicant's request that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 1 May 64, the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) considered and denied an application (SAFCB 6 4 - 8 4 4 ) for correction of military records pertaining to the applicant, in which he requested that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable (Exhibit A). The Board majority does not believe an honorable...
Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request to change his RE code and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit D). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit E). Applicant's...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant's responses to the advisory opinions are at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
On 16 October 1957, applicant was discharged in the grade of airman basic, under the provisions of AFR 39-18 (Court Conviction), and received a bad conduct discharge. We conclude, therefore, that the discharge proceedings were proper and characterization of the discharge was appropriate to the existing circumstances. We also find insufficient evidence to warrant a recommendation that the discharge be upgraded on the basis of clemency.
AFBCMR 98-02715 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Corr'ection of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinen Force relating to show that he was c inactive duty trainlng points during the retirement/retention year 20 August 1997 through 19 August 1998,...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
Even though the JSAM citation was not on file in the OSR when the board convened, they knew of its existence as evidenced by the entry on the OSB; therefore, the board members were knowledgeable the decoration was awarded to the applicant which is the ultimate purpose of including them in the promotion selection process. DPPPAB is strongly opposed to the applicant receiving SSB consideration for the CY98B promotion board since the original board members were aware of the decoration and it...
Based on the findings of the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) and the applicant’s apparent strong desire to serve his country the Board believed the applicant should be afforded the opportunity to apply for a waiver to enlist in the armed services. A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit H. On 15 May 1999, applicant submitted his statements, Letter, 2BW/JA, dated 30 August 1995, letters of appreciation and recognition, and copies of his records, and his...