Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9802145
Original file (9802145.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  98-02145
            INDEX NUMBER:  135.00;131.05
            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  YES

Applicant requests his date of  rank  of  captain  be  reinstated  to
21 March 1991 rather than 29 April 1993.  Applicant's  submission  is
at Exhibit A.

The appropriate Air Force office evaluated  applicant's  request  and
provided  an  advisory  opinion  to  the   Board   recommending   the
application  be  denied  (Exhibit  C).   The  advisory  opinion   was
forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). As of
this date, no response has been received by this office.

After careful consideration of applicant's request and the  available
evidence of  record,  we  find  insufficient  evidence  of  error  or
injustice to warrant  corrective  action.   The  facts  and  opinions
stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence  of
record and have not been rebutted by  applicant.   Absent  persuasive
evidence applicant was denied rights to which  entitled,  appropriate
regulations were not followed,  or  appropriate  standards  were  not
applied, we find no basis to disturb the existing record.

Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.

The applicant's case is adequately documented and  it  has  not  been
shown that  a  personal  appearance  with  or  without  counsel  will
materially  add  to  our  understanding  of  the   issues   involved.
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.

The Board staff is directed to inform  applicant  of  this  decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this  decision  is  final  and
will only be reconsidered  upon  the  presentation  of  new  relevant
evidence  which  was  not  reasonably  available  at  the  time   the
application was filed.

Members of the Board, Mr. Henry C. Saunders, Ms. Sophie A. Clark, and
Ms. Ann L. Heidig, considered this application on 10 December 1998 in
accordance with the provisions of Air Force Instruction  36-2603  and
the governing statute, 10 U.S.C. 1552.




                                    HENRY C. SAUNDERS
                                    Panel Chair

Exhibits:
A.  Applicant's DD Form 149
B.  Available Master Personnel Records
C.  Advisory Opinion
D.  SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9801918

    Original file (9801918.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | BC-1998-01918

    Original file (BC-1998-01918.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | BC-1998-02145

    Original file (BC-1998-02145.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9801973

    Original file (9801973.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinions appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | BC-1998-01973

    Original file (BC-1998-01973.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinions appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9801794

    Original file (9801794.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | BC-1998-01794

    Original file (BC-1998-01794.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9703174

    Original file (9703174.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant's response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9603312

    Original file (9603312.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force off ice evaluated applicant I s request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9801792

    Original file (9801792.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending t h e application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant f o r review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.