CORRECTED DIRECTIVE
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON, DC
September 4, 1998
I
Office of the Assistant Secretary
AFBCMR 98-01993
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction
36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of
the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that:
ords of the Department of the Air Force relating t-
corrected to show that:
a. The Field Grade Officer Performance Report, AF Form 707A, rendered for the period
27 May 1995 through 26 May 1996, and all the referral documents attached thereto, be, and hereby
are, declared void and removed from his records.
b. The attached reaccomplished Field Grade Officer Performance Report, rendered for
the period 27 May 1995 through 26 May 1996, with all Performance Factors in Section V marked
“Meets Standards,” be filed in his Officer Selection Record, in its proper sequence.
c. The action by the Secretary of the Air Force to remove his name fiom the listing of
officers selected for promotion to the grade of colonel by the CY 1994A Central Colonel Selection
Board be, and hereby is, set aside, thereby reinstating his promotion to the grade of colonel, with an
effective date and a date of rank of 1 October 1996.
d. All Field Grade Officer Performance Reports, AF Forms 707A, commencing with the
report rendered for the period 27 May 1996 through 26 May 1997, be corrected to show he was
serving in the grade of colonel, rather than lieutenant colonel.
e. His selection for Senior Service School (SSS) by the CY 1994 IColonel Selection
Board be, and hereby is, reinstated and he be enrolled in the Secretary of Defense Fellowship
Program at Lockheed-Martin Headquarters (if possible), commencing in the summer of 1999. If a
Fellowship at Lockheed-Martin or any other District of Columbia area company is unavailable, he
be enrolled for school year 1999 at the Industrial College of the Armed Forces (ICAF). If neither of
the foregoing training is available, he be enrolled in the National War College (NWC) for school
year 1999.
&$Lw
Chief xaminer
Attachment:
AF Form 707A (27 May 1995 - 26 May 1996)
Air Force Board for Correction
of Military Records
CORRECTED DIRECTIVE
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON, DC
SEP 0 4 1998
Office of the Assistant Secretary
AFBCMR 98-01993
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR
SUBJECT :
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI ++
Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility
and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision
that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an
injustice.
36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in
the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the
Executive Director of the Board or his designee.
Attachment:
Ltr, HQ AFPC/DPPP, dtd Aug 31, 1998,
W/Atchs
Pa el Chair
- -obs, and recommended placed in A compiete copy of the evaluation 1s attached at Exhibit K O APPLICANT'S REVIEW OE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and has provided her response which is attached at Exhibit M. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. Essentially applicant requests chat the contested Officer Performance Report (OPR) closing 30 April 1996 bp removed and replaced with a reaccomplished report reflecting her grade as lieutenant colonel with no indication...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01486
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01486 INDEX CODE: 131.00, 111.01 COUNSEL: BARRY P. STEINBERG HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reserve Officer Performance Reports (OPRs) be considered by the Special Selection Boards (SSBs) for the Calendar Years 1995 (CY95) through 1998B Major Line Central Selection Boards. ...
The Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered on him for the period of 6 Mar 97 through 5 Mar 98 be revised. _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Due to confusion and oversights on appropriate professional military education (PME) endorsements by his Rater, Additional Rater, and Reviewer on the OPR rendered on him for the period 6 Mar 97 through 5 Mar 98, his Reviewer is requesting that the report be revised to correct PME recommendations...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-03145
A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states that an injustice exists; the request to fix the law is in process, according to ARPC. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT,...
A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states that an injustice exists; the request to fix the law is in process, according to ARPC. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT,...
In support of the appeal, applicant submits a statement from the rater on the OPRs closing 23 November 1990, 23 November 1991, 23 November 1992, stating that the very nature of applicant‘s day-to-day duties has for many years been of such a highly classified nature that a great deal of his real accomplishments and duties simply could not be included in the Air Force evaluation system due to security restrictions. The statement from the rater of the OPRs rendered from 24 November 1 9 8 9...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03117
The Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) prepared for the P0601A Colonel Board be removed from his records and replaced with the reaccomplished PRF he has provided. In this respect, we note that in accordance with the governing Air Force Instruction (AFI) in effect at the time the PRF was rendered, supporting documentation from both the senior rater and MLR president is required prior to correction of Section IV, Promotion Recommendation, of a PRF. c. We are not persuaded the MOI used...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-1996-02752A
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 10 June 1998, the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) considered the applicant’s request that the Officer Performance Report (OPR) closing 31 January 1994, be corrected to reflect factual and thorough participation for the reporting period. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice to warrant removing the OPR closing...
The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant indicated that he contacted the office of primary responsibility (OPR) for the Air Force evaluation to clarify the recommendation to not allow the additional rater to rewrite the final bullet in section VII. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-1990-01087
The letter, dated 6 June 1996, be removed from his records. In an application, dated 15 February 1990, he requested the following: a. Furthermore, since the reports were matters of record at the time of his promotion consideration by the P0597A and P0698B selection boards, we also recommend he receive promotion consideration by SSB for these selection boards.