AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00605
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00605 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed from North Dakota to Germany. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00611
She was not recommended for a permanent change of station (PCS) decoration for her service between March 2006 and June 2008, because she did not have a current PT on file, even though the squadron commander had waived the requirement. 2 AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicant’s request for award of a decoration for her service between March 2006 and June 2008. The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPSOO recommends denial of the applicant’s request for...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00612
Attained at least 150 hours of flying duty as an The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: USAF/A3O-AIF recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the Aircrew Member and Flight Engineer Badges indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. We note...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00619
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ADMINISTRATIVELY DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00619 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge be corrected to reflect entitlement to the following awards and decorations: 1. The Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM). By letter dated 18 April 2012...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00621
He was credited with 3 years, 8 months, and 27 days of active duty service. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial, stating, in part that a review of his Master Personnel Records (MPRs) and documentation submitted failed to reveal any documents that substantiate foreign service time in Thailand. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00625
The applicant provided United States Air Force Central (USAFCENT) special order G-00461, dated 9 Oct 09 and contends that her service with the Air Component Coordination Element in Afghanistan (ACCE-A) from 14 Dec 08 to 16 Jun 09, should qualify her for entitlement to the MUA. In response to their request, the applicant only provided page 2 of special order TE-0062. Regarding her request for entitlement to award of the NATO Medal-ISAF, AfgCM, and AFER w/GB, we note the applicant’s DD Form...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00627
Mental Health referred the applicant to a medical evaluation board (MEB). Further, it must be noted that the service disability boards must rate disabilities based on the individual's condition at the time of evaluation. We further find the applicants medical condition was thoroughly reviewed in accordance with the applicable instructions and policy and appropriately determined to have existed prior to her service (EPTS) and therefore not compensable.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00630
This is the applicable RE code for all four year enlistees who separate under Palace Chase prior to completing 36 months of service (as long as a higher priority negative RE code is not more appropriate). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00630
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00630 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The signature date on his Officer Performance Report (OPR) be changed from 16 June 2011 to 13 June 2011 and he be granted a Special Selection Board (SSB) for the Calendar Year 2011 (CY11) Lieutenant Colonel (Lt Col) Selection Board. A review of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00633
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00633 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation code and narrative reason for separation be removed from his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. During the evaluation, the applicant self-reported he struggled with symptoms of anger and depression since...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00636
Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air AFBCMR BC-2012-00636 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: APPLICANT, be corrected to show that his Fitness Assessment...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00640
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00640 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to show that he elected Option C (Immediate Annuity), under the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP), for spouse and child coverage, based on full retired pay. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00649
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00649 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of “2B” (Involuntarily separated with a general or under other than honorable conditions discharge) be changed to a code that would allow her to reenlist. RE code 2B is correct per her general discharge. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00651
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00651 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. The applicant was discharged from active duty in the grade of senior airman effective 11 June 1990 with a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00657
In the requested waiver the applicant 2 acknowledged his rights to present his case before an administrative discharge board, be represented by military counsel, and submit statements in his own behalf to be considered by the administrative discharge board and the separation authority. The applicant submitted an appeal for upgrade of his discharge and change of the narrative reason for discharge to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB). While the applicant alleges the confession was...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00658
His reenlistment date reflect his original date of reenlistment of 31 Oct 11. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of responsibility which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an injustice. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00661
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00661 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Vietnam decoration be added to his DD Form 214, Report of Transfer or Discharge, issued 21 Apr 68. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Based on the available documents provided by the applicant,...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00664
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00664 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation be changed to read a temporary mental disability rather than personality disorder. acknowledged receipt of the applicant On 18 Dec 00, the discharge authority directed the applicant be furnished an entry-level...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00667
The available documentation reflects the applicant was AWOL and in confinement, from 9 Nov 54 through 7 Dec 54. The complete DPTOS evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Through his Member of Congress, by letter dated 3 Jul 12, theapplicant indicated he was actually admitted to the hospital 2 prior to 9 Nov 54; that he was discharged on 15 Nov 54 and released into military custody. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission, including his...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00669
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00669 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The record be corrected to reflect a timely election for former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). In March 1999, when the member and the applicant divorced, neither the divorce decree nor the QDRO required the applicant be named as...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00670
On 27 Apr 12, he sent a letter stating the only document he had was the AF IMT 988, Leave Request/Authorization, for his permissive TDY and terminal leave. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial stating the governing instructions state that the member...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00671
He remarried on 6 June 2008 and states that he was deployed to Iraq for most of the first year of his marriage, which likely resulted in him not receiving the election in a timely manner. DPTT states neither the applicant nor his spouse notified DPTT regarding the marital status change within one year as required by law. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00672
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00672 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be entitled to the Post 9/11 GI Bill educational benefits. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). Therefore, we recommend the applicant’s record be corrected as indicated below.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00673
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: During the physical fitness assessment on 1 March 2011, he had a stabbing pain in his right kidney. The doctor requested an x-ray of his kidneys. In view of this, and noting there was no documentation located or provided that indicates the applicant was unable to complete his FA, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00675
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2012-00675 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her physical Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 26 May 2011 and 23 August 2011, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicant’s military service record, are contained in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00679
AFBCMR BC-2013-00679 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. It is further directed that the corrected record be considered for promotion to the grade of major by a Special Selection Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00683
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the HSM. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00686
Her records reflect she served four years of active duty service and was separated normally. On 29 Oct 91, the applicant was notified of her commander’s intent to recommend that she be discharged from the Air Force under the provisions of AFR 39-10, for Conditions that Interfere with Military Service, specifically, Mental Disorders. DPSOS states that based on documentation on file in the applicant’s master personnel records, the applicant’s discharge to include the narrative reason for...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00689
The applicant acknowledged that he was not informed about providing his marriage certificate nor completing the required paperwork to designate his eligible dependents for RCSBP coverage but he believed his spouse and stepdaughter were covered under the RCSBP program at that time. 2 because of his election automatic ARPC was not notified of the birth of his son within one year of the event as required by law. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00690
On the member’s citation it does not state “extraordinary” heroism, it just states “heroism.” A complete copy of the NGB/A1PS advisory is at Exhibit C. SAF/MRBP recommends denial indicating that there is no evidence of an error or injustice. A determination that extraordinary heroism was or was not involved is made by the Secretary of the Air Force at the time the award is processed.” Since the applicant was a member of the ANG at the time of his act, his AmnM was not evaluated for...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00692
These letters were not received in time for consideration by the 27 Nov 12 Board. After a thorough review of the facts and circumstances of this case, we agree with recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision the applicants records should be corrected to reflect that he submitted a valid request to terminate SBP coverage. The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-00692...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00693
Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of AFBCMR BC-2012-00693 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00694
The applicant was discharged on 26 March 1986. On 7 March 2013, a request for information pertaining to his post-service activities was forwarded to the applicant for review and response. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to recommend granting the relief sought on that basis.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00695
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00695 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His fitness assessment test, dated 12 January 2012, be removed. On 19 March 2012, DPSIM requested the applicant forward a signed memorandum from the Fitness Assessment Cell staff documenting that his sit ups were counted incorrectly. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00699
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00699 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Time In Service (TIS) be extended to two years. Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge to include the characterization of service was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00706
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00706 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant waived his education benefits briefing for...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00707
On 7 Nov 2011 the DVA sent a letter that restored his education benefits. The complete A1YR evaluation is at Exhibit C. NGB/A1PS concurs with A1YR and recommends approval of the applicant’s request to change his eligibility to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependent. 3 ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00717
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00717 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 20 May 1996, the commander directed the applicant be separated with a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00720
The complete AFPC/DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit B. He believes his ADSC should be 9 June 2015 based on his original intent for the TEB and the fact that he did not receive an email concerning the SOU and an expired TEB application. We note the applicant’s assertion that he suffered an injustice when he did not receive an email concerning the SOU and an expired TEB application; however, he has not provided sufficient evidence to support that he was treated any differently than other...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00721
On 13 Sep 12, AFPC/DPSOR notified the applicant that IAW AFI 36- 3202, Separation Documents they cannot add the statement “Vietnam Era Veteran” to his DD Form 214; however, his Kuwait Liberation Medal has been amended to read Kuwait Liberation Medal-Kuwait (KLM-K) and will be administratively corrected. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIRP recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change his name in his military personnel...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00724
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His discharge is unjust because the law changed. The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He asks the Board to consider the recommendation provided by the Air Force of primary responsibility and provides a copy of his DD Form 214 for review. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00726
Although he has been unable to provide copies of travel vouchers in support of his request, it is our opinion that the applicant has provided sufficient evidence to persuade us that he served in Vietnam. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he had boots on the ground in Da Nang Air Base, Vietnam, from 21 Mar 1972 through 20...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00730
In support of her request, the applicant provides copies of documents extracted from his military personnel record, a copy of his death certificate, a copy of the “Distinguished Flying Cross and Air Medal Criteria in the Army Air Forces in World War II” by Barry L. Spink, Archivist, Air Force Historical Research Agency, and other supporting documents. SAFPC states although the criteria for award of the Air Medal (AM) and Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) changed numerous times during the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00732
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit D. _______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLOA/JAJM recommends the Board deny the applicant’s request as untimely or on the merits. He also claims that the Numbered Air Force returned the Article 15 action because of the punishment's severity. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00735
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00735 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct characterization of service be upgraded to accurately reflect his 18 years of service. The complete AFLOA/JAJM evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00736
We find no evidence which indicates the applicant’s service characterization, which had its basis in his conviction by general court-martial and was a part of the sentence of the military court, was improper or that it exceeded the limitations set forth in the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2012-00736 in Executive Session on 4 Oct 12, under...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00737
On 28 February 1973, the applicant was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the Air Force Reserve. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 7 May 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit C). Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 7 May 2012.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00741
Subsequent to the file being found legally sufficient, the discharge authority approved the request for discharge and directed the applicant be discharged with an under other than honorable conditions characterization of service. On 6 April 1979, the applicant submitted an appeal for upgrade of his discharge to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (DRB). 3 ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00743
By letter dated 6 July 2012, (Exhibit C) AFPC/DPSIDRA advised the applicant they had made a thorough review of his official military personnel record and provided documents and verified his entitlement to the NDSM and Good Conduct Medal (GCM). The ribbon was authorized to be awarded to Air Force and Air Force Reserve members credited with completion of an overseas tour on or after 1 September 1980. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00744
Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to compel us to recommend granting the relief sought on that basis. Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 19 Jun 2012.