AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00447
The complete DPSIPE evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DPSIPE accurately describes his position by stating, "The applicant feels that the TAFMS requirement is for enlistment in a higher pay grade than last held in the regular component. In reference to AFI36-2002, A4.2, Prior Service Date of Rank and Enlistment Grade, we interpret the TAFMS for enlistment in a higher grade as only...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00448
He be awarded an additional Oak Leaf Cluster (OLC) to his Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC). Therefore, in view of this, we believe it would be in the interest of justice to award him an additional DFC because his remaining 200 combat hours meet the criteria for this recognition. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 18...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00449
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00449 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Thirty days of lost leave be reinstated. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00450
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The complete AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00451
When his waist was measured, the landmark was an inch above the right uppermost hip bone. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00453
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant began his military service on 13 May 58 and was progressively promoted to the grade of airman second class (E-3), effective and with a date of rank (DOR) of 1 Feb 61. Air Force Regulation (AFR) 39-29, Promotion of Airmen, dated 31 Mar 54, indicates that all airman basics (AB) will be promoted to airman third class (E-2) upon completion of Basic Military Training (BMT) or after four months of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00454
To comply with federal law, AFAFC established spouse coverage based on full retired pay under the SBP, updated the applicant’s date of birth as the eligible spouse beneficiary and began deducting premiums from the service member’s retired pay. The DPSIAR complete evaluation is at Exhibit B. The Board has been advised that it can consider cases involving potential claims by more than one spouse or former spouse if there is evidence that the member or former spouse timely notified...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00456
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS a general discharge without AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00456 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded to Honorable. If treatment for alcohol and narcotics were available at the time of his active duty service, he would probably still be actively serving in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00460
On 24 Dec 09, the applicant was relieved from his assignment at ARPC/NARS-A, Denver, Colorado and assigned to the Retired Reserve Section, placing him on the Retired Reserve List effective 27 Sep 10. However, other than his own assertions, the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence that his medical condition, while service connected by the DVA, rendered him unfit for continued military service at the time of his separation. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00461
He was never informed that he would lose his entitlements to CRSC and CRDP because he retired prior to reaching 20 years of active duty service. On 1 Dec 04, the DVA awarded him a compensable disability rating of 10 percent for General Anxiety Disorder. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSDC recommends denial of the applicant’s request that his anxiety disorder be approved for CRSC.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00471
He was “forced” to sign the paperwork because if he did not he would fall under the declination statement on AF Form 63, Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) Acknowledgement Statement, which would mean that he would not be allowed to change duty stations and/or complete his pilot training, and possibly be separated from the Air Force. On 21 Apr 99, the applicant signed AF Form 56, Application for Training Leading to a Commission in the United States Air Force. He also signed the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00475
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. On 16 December 2011, the member tested on all four components. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00478
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00478 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 29 Dec 92, the applicant’s commander notified him that she was recommending he be discharged from the Air Force for Misconduct - Pattern of Minor Disciplinary...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00479
The complete DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit F. HQ AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial of the applicant's request for a change of RE code. If the Board upgrades the applicant’s character of service to honorable his RE code would automatically change to 2C, which denotes "Involuntarily separated under AFR 39-10 with an honorable discharge." DPSOA will provide the applicant a corrected copy of his DD Form 214 with an RE code of 2B, unless otherwise directed by the Board.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00490
The applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 19 Mar 12.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00492
He should be granted compensation under the CRSC program for his service-connected disability of PTSD. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSDC recommends denial of the applicant’s request that his PTSD be approved for CRSC. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice;...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00493
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00943 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he elected not to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends the applicant’s records be corrected...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00498
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00498 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Article 15, imposed on 30 January 2006, be removed from his Officer and Command Selection Record (OCSR) and he receive Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration by his In-the- Promotion Zone (IPZ) Calendar Year 2010D (CY10D) Major...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00499
He has never had possession of his medical records and is not aware if his wartime injuries were included. While the evidence provided does support the applicant was participating in a combat mission and subsequently received medical treatment after his aircraft crashed, unfortunately, the evidence available to us is not sufficient to determine that the aircraft crash was caused by enemy shrapnel. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00500
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2012-00500 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation date be changed from 18 September 2011 to 30 September 2011. CC states the applicant’s request to change his separation date from 18 September 2011 to 30 September 2011 would allow his heart surgery to be paid for by the Air Force. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00501
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00501 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States, be corrected to reflect the following: 1. A review of his Master Personnel Records and documentation submitted failed to provide any evidence that substantiates foreign...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00508
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00508 IN THE MATTER OF: COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to show he was awarded a second Air Force Meritorious Service Medal (MSM). The complete AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00510
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00510 IN THE MATTER OF: COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable based on the repeal of Title 10, United States Code (USC), Section 654, more commonly known as “Don’t Ask, Don’t...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00511
The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of correcting the applicant’s record to reflect he served in ODS based on the fact that his record does not reflect any foreign service time. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to recommend granting the relief sought on that basis. _________________________________________________________________ The...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00521
On 21 Jun 11, the applicant’s commander notified her of his intent to recommend her discharge from the Air Force for unsatisfactory performance, specifically failure to progress in required military training. First, the RE code the applicant requests, R1, does not exist. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice;...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00525
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00525 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: __________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His corrected Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered for the period 28 October 2008 thorough 27 October 2009 be reconsidered for supplemental promotion consideration by the Calendar Year 2010A (CY10A) Lieutenant Colonel (Lt Col) Line of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00526
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00526 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation, “Erroneous Entry,” be removed from his records. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the BCMR Medical...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00528
In Mar 11, he received an untimely Letter of Reprimand (LOR) with a Unfavorable Information File (UIF) for a Mar 09 incident in which he was arrested for driving under the influence (DUI) from a leadership chain that was not his leadership at the time of the incident. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOO evaluation is at Exhibit D. AFPC/JA recommends approval of the applicants request to void and remove his LOR, referral OPR, and to reinstate him on the Lt Col promotion list. Nevertheless,...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00529
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00529 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to one that would allow him to enlist in the Air National Guard. The applicant’s complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00530
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00530 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The legal review for discharge action by the staff judge advocate reflects an investigation was conducted regarding two allegations by the applicant of sexual assault. The AFBCMR Medical Consultant states although certain documents of record...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00531
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00531 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reentry (RE) code of 2C, which denotes "Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service," be changed to a 1C. To date, a response has not been received (Exhibit C). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00533
He was told upon separating, he could change it to his spouse’s home of record. The applicant’s enlistment agreement reflects Lexington, South Carolina as his home of record at the time of enlistment. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00534
On 24 Jan 11, he failed Block 1, Unit 9, Test A, with a d. On 4 Apr 11, he failed Block 6, Unit 7, Test A, with a c. On 28 Feb 11, he failed Block 4, Unit 3, Test A, with a score of 55 percent. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is attached at Exhibits C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOS recommends...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00540
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The referral report he received was unjustly rendered as a “3” in violation of numerous requirements of Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-2406, Officer and Enlisted Evaluation Systems. The contested report should not have been a referral report. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request to remove the contested EPR from his...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00547
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00547 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1Y recommends denial. The applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, we...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00553
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit B. _______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIAR recommends approval noting there is no evidence the applicant received an SBP briefing or made an SBP election prior to his retirement. _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00554
AFPC/DPSIM recommended the fitness assessment dated 22 February 2011 be removed. Should the Board deem the fitness assessments date 1 June 2011 and 31 August 2011 invalid and direct the EPR be changed from a referral to a non-referral, the applicant will be entitled to supplemental promotion consideration beginning with cycle 12E6, once tested. The complete DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00555
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00555 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. When the discharge authority approved the applicant’s involuntary discharge with honorable character of service, her RE Code should have been changed to “2C” Involuntarily Separated with an Honorable Discharge or Entry Level Separation Without...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00566
His date of rank (DOR) and effective date of promotion is 1 December 2011. Upon completing the Article 15 punishment action, the applicant became eligible for promotion the following day to the rank of Airman, (E-2). Based on documentation, (AF Form 3070A), provided, the request to adjust the applicant’s promotion eligibility date (PED) and Date of Rank (DOR) meets the basic requirements for correction of his promotion history to 23 June 2011 versus 1 July 2011, his requested date.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00574
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 18 May 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit C). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00575
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. Therefore, in view of the fact the applicant has not provided any new and/or relevant evidence in support of his request for the PH Medal, we find that his request does not meet the criteria for reconsideration. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice;...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00578
While the applicant’s service in Vietnam does not meet the requirement for documentation on the DD Form 214, the Board has found it in the interest of justice to provide similarly situated applicants a “boots-on-the-ground” letter, and therefore recommends the record be corrected as indicated below. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00579
On 8 Apr 80, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for unsuitability, apathy and defective attitude, or inability to expend effort constructively. The complete AFPC/DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 27 Apr 12, for review and comment within 30 days. Based on...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00584
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00584 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be updated to reflect his foreign service to Spain from Jan 63 to Apr 63 and Vietnam from Jul 65 to Oct 65. After requesting a copy of his records, he only received a...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00588
To be considered for promotion to E-5 an individual must have had a minimum of 18 months time-in-grade (TIG), a skill level commensurate with their Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC), and be recommended by the commander. To be considered for promotion to TSgt, an individual must have 18 months TIG as a SSgt, possess a 7-skill level, have a current PFE and SKT score, and be recommended by the promotion authority. The complete DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00589
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00589 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. f. Any unit awards for time served in Vietnam. The applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, after reviewing the evidence of record, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00592
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00592 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge, to include his characterization of service, was consistent with the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00597
In a letter from his commander, dated 24 Dec 72, paragraph 1m. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are at Exhibit B and C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOE defers their recommendation by stating the applicant was promoted to sergeant on 1 Jun 71 and received a reduction to airman first class on 31 Dec 71. He was...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00599
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00599 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect the following: Force Central Command for determination of entitlement) 1. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00600
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00600 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His honorable discharge be changed to a Reserve retirement. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of...