Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00661
Original file (BC-2012-00661.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00661 
COUNSEL:  NONE 
HEARING DESIRED:  NO 

 
                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 
 
IN THE MATTER OF: 
   
   
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
His  Vietnam  decoration  be  added  to  his  DD  Form  214,  Report  of 
Transfer or Discharge, issued 21 Apr 68.   
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
He  served  in  Southeast  Asia  (SEA)  in  direct  support  of 
operations  in  Vietnam.    While  assigned  to  Clark  Air  Base  (AB), 
Philippines,  he  was  on  temporary  duty  (TDY)  status  in  various 
SEA locations between Sep 66 and May 68. 
 
In  support  of  his  appeal,  the  applicant  provides  a  personal 
statement; copies of his DD Form 214, issued in conjunction with 
his  21  Apr  68  separation,  and  the  NGB  Form  22,  Report  of 
Separation and Record of Service, issued on 1 Feb 93. 
 
The  applicant’s  complete  submission,  with  attachments,  is  at 
Exhibit A. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
Based  on  the  available  documents  provided  by  the  applicant,  he 
enlisted in the Regular Air Force, on 22 Apr 64, for a period of 
four  years.    He  was  stationed  at  Clark  AB,  Philippines  at  the 
time of separation. 
 
He  was  honorably  discharged  from  active  duty,  on  21  Apr  68, 
under the provisions of AFR 39-10.  During this period, he was 
credited with 4 years of active duty service, including 1 year, 
7 months and 14 days of foreign service. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The  applicant  has  exhausted  all  remedies  provided  by 
existing law or regulations. 
 

to 

his 

claim, 

e.g., 

substantiate 

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 
 
3.  Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the  case.    However,  based  on  the  available  evidence  of  record, 
including  the  NGB Form 22,  we  did  not  find  the  evidence 
sufficient to establish the applicant has been the victim of an 
error  or  injustice.    Should  the  applicant  provide  additional 
documentation 
TDY 
order(s)/voucher(s),  we  would  be  willing  to  reconsider  his 
appeal.  In view of the above and in the absence of evidence to 
the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief 
sought in this application.  
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 
 
The  applicant  be  notified  the  evidence  presented  did  not 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  material  error  or  injustice;  the 
application  was  denied  without  a  personal  appearance;  and  the 
application  will  only  be  reconsidered  upon  the  submission  of 
newly  discovered  relevant  evidence  not  considered  with  this 
application. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  AFBCMR  Docket 
Number  BC-2012-00661  in  Executive  Session  on  20  December  2012, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 
The following documentary evidence was considered: 
 
    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 17 Oct 11, w/atchs.  
 
 
 
 
                                   Panel Chair 

 

2



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03687

    Original file (BC-2010-03687.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of boots on ground in Vietnam, stating, in part, that the applicant’s master personnel records and the documentation submitted failed to provide any evidence that substantiates foreign service time in Vietnam. While it is not conclusive that the applicant served in the Republic of Vietnam, we find the submitted evidence to be credible and consistent with his statements and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03549

    Original file (BC-2012-03549.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03549 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His military personnel records be corrected to reflect he served in the Republic of Vietnam and Southeast Asia from 10 Jul 67 through 11 Jan 68. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00026

    Original file (BC-2011-00026.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFPC/DPAPP verified the applicant served at Kadena Air Base (AB), Japan, from 20 Sep 67 to 22 Mar 68, for a total of six months and four days. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The documentation provided to date clearly shows flight time during both TDYs, in 67-68 and 68-69. Someone must know KC-135 crew chiefs flew with their aircraft on most missions at that time.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02254

    Original file (BC-2012-02254.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    While his Master Personnel Records did confirm foreign service at Clark Air Base, Philippines for a period of 1 year, 5 months, and 25 days, the total foreign service time as reflected on his DD Form 214 reflects 1 year, 7 months, and 25 days of foreign service; however, since it cannot be proven that he did not serve additional foreign service that cannot be found in the records, no corrective action should be taken. The complete AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01247

    Original file (BC-2011-01247.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served in Thailand and Vietnam; however, his orders and record copies reflecting his service from 1966 through 1977 are missing. In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a personal statement; a copy of his DD Form 214, Report of Transfer or Discharge, issued in conjunction with his 28 Aug 70 discharge; an extract of an airman performance report (APR); a statement from a former...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04051

    Original file (BC-2011-04051.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s DD Form 214 does not reflect service in Vietnam or Thailand. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. The Board notes the Air Force office of primary responsibility confirms the applicant was TDY to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | bc-2012-01966

    Original file (bc-2012-01966.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPAPP states that a review of the applicant’s Master Personnel Records and the documentation submitted does not substantiate his claim that he served in Vietnam. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 2 Jul 12. In support of the applicant’s request that his records be corrected to reflect his service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN), he has provided the original temporary duty (TDY) orders assigning him from Clark Air Base, the Philippines, to Hue Phu Bai, RVN for two days in February 1968 and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03332

    Original file (BC-2006-03332.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although a memo from the VA states there is a document in his record that states he was recommended for the award of the Vietnam Service Medal and Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, no such document was found in his Master Personnel Record. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04350

    Original file (BC 2013 04350.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04350 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect his service in Vietnam. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02107

    Original file (BC-2007-02107.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02107 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: Jan 06, 2009 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect service in Viet Nam. ...