Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00724
Original file (BC-2012-00724.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00724 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

His discharge is unjust because the law changed. He was 18 years 
old at the time of his discharge. He was not aware of the law 
and was accused of one incident of indecency. He joined the Air 
Force to serve his country during the Korean War. He was married 
for 55 years, has three sons, is now 79 years old, and wishes to 
have his discharge changed in the name of justice. 

 

His complete submission is at Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant entered the Regular Air Force on 6 Oct 50. The 
applicant’s commander recommended him for discharge under AFR 35-
66 for homosexual conduct. He received an undesirable discharge 
effective 27 Nov 51 after serving 1 year, 1 month, and 18 days on 
active duty. 

 

On 20 Sep 11, the law commonly known as “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” 
(DADT), 10 USC 654, was repealed. The Department of Defense 
subsequently issued guidance indicating that Service Discharge 
Review Boards (DRB) should normally grant requests to change the 
narrative reason for a discharge, requests to re-characterize the 
discharge to honorable, and/or requests to change the reentry 
code when both of the following conditions were met: (1) the 
original discharge was based solely on DADT or a similar policy 
in place prior to enactment of DADT, and (2) there were no 
aggravating factors in the record, such as misconduct. 

 

 

 

 

 

 


The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the 
Air Force, which is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSOA recommends changing the applicant’s Reenlistment 
Eligibility (RE) code to “1” (An applicant is eligible for 
immediate reenlistment (within 24 hours after separation), if his 
RE code is required to be listed. They do have the applicant’s 
DD Form 214, Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the 
United States, to review to see if an RE code is listed. 

 

The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

He asks the Board to consider the recommendation provided by the 
Air Force of primary responsibility and provides a copy of his 
DD Form 214 for review. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit E. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an injustice. In light of the 
repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell (DADT) and in accordance with the 
Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness) guidance 
memorandum, Correction of Military records Following Repeal of 
Section 654 of Title 10, United States Code, dated 20 September 
2011, Discharge review Boards should normally grant requests to 
re-characterize a discharge to honorable when both of the 
following conditions are met: (1) the original discharge was 
based solely on DADT or a similar policy in place prior to 
enactment of DADT and (2) there were no aggravating factors in 
the record, such as misconduct. Based on our review of the 


evidence of record, we recommend upgrading the applicant’s 
discharge to honorable since there were no aggravating factors. 
We took note of AFPC/DPSOA’s recommendation to change the RE code 
if applicable; however, we note the applicant’s DD Form 214 does 
not list an RE code and therefore no change is necessary. 
Therefore, we recommend the applicant's record be corrected as 
indicated below. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force 
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 27 November 
1951 he was honorably discharged and furnished an Honorable 
Discharge certificate. 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-00724 in Executive Session on 26 Mar 13, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

, Panel Chair 

, Member 

, Member 

 

All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The 
following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 15 Feb 12. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 6 Nov 12. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 Nov 12. 

 Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 20 Dec 12, w/atchs. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02279

    Original file (BC-2012-02279.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force which are at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOS recommends approval, indicating the applicant’s service characterization should be corrected to reflect “Honorable” and the narrative reason for separation be changed to “Secretarial Authority”. The Department of Defense...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00378 ADDENDUM

    Original file (BC-2011-00378 ADDENDUM.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00378 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code be replaced with one that will allow him to reenlist. On 10 September 2011, the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness (OSD-P&R) released guidance pertaining to the correction of military records...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01201

    Original file (BC-2011-01201.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01201 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to: 1. In accordance with Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness) guidance memorandum, Correction of Military Records Following Repeal of Section 654 of Title 10, United States Code, dated 20 September 2011,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00438

    Original file (BC 2014 00438.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00438 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of “HRB” (homosexual conduct-statement) and Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of “2C” (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge) be changed to allow her to rejoin the Air Force. Although the discharge was properly processed according to the applicable...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01824

    Original file (BC 2014 01824.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01824 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded to Honorable. Although each request must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, the award of an honorable or general discharge should normally be considered to indicate the absence of aggravating factors.” The discharge was properly processed according...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03062

    Original file (BC 2014 03062.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 10 Sep 11, the Under Secretary of Defense issued guidance pertaining to correction of military records requests resulting from the repeal of Title 10, Section 654, commonly known as “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell (DADT).” Effective 20 Sept 11, Service DRBs should normally grant requests to change the narrative reason for a discharge (the change should be “Secretarial Authority” (Separation Program Designator Code (SPD) code JFF)), requests to re-characterize the discharge to honorable,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00088

    Original file (BC 2014 00088.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00088 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason for separation on his on his DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect “Secretarial Authority,” instead of “homosexual conduct.” APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was discharged on the basis of unfounded accusations of homosexual conduct and his discharge did not...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04382

    Original file (BC 2013 04382.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The staff judge advocate stated that on 22 October 1993, the applicant unconditionally waived his right to an administrative discharge board and requested a general discharge. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 1 November 1993, he was honorably discharged with a narrative reason for separation of “Secretarial...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02641

    Original file (BC-2012-02641.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02641 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1) Her records changed to reflect her married name. She received a narrative reason for separation of “Homosexual Admission.” On 16 October 2012, AFPC/DPSIRP notified the applicant that in accordance with AFI 36-2608, Military Personnel Records...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05269

    Original file (BC 2013 05269.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 10 Sep 11, the Under Secretary of Defense issued guidance pertaining to correction of military records requests resulting from the repeal of Title 10, Section 654, commonly known as “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell (DADT).” In a memorandum, dated 20 Sep 11, the Under Secretary of Defense published guidance that Service Discharge Review Boards should normally grant requests to change the narrative reason for discharge (the change should be to “Secretarial Authority”), requests to re-characterize the...