AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2012-00675
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
IN THE MATTER OF:
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her physical Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 26 May 2011 and
23 August 2011, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management
System (AFFMS).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
During the time she was administered her FAs, she was undergoing
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) treatment which hindered
her performance during both FAs in question.
In support of her appeal, the applicant provides a personal
statement, a physician’s statement, two letters of support, an
AFFMS document, and two qualifications status documents.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently a member of the Regular Air Force
serving in the grade of senior master sergeant (E-8). Her FAs
for 26 May 2011 and 23 August 2011 both reflect an unsatisfactory
fitness level in the AFFMS. The applicant has a subsequent FA,
dated 20 October 2011 that reflects a satisfactory fitness level
in AFFMS.
The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicant’s
military service record, are contained in the evaluation provided
by the Air Force office of primary responsibility at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AF/A1PP recommends denial. A1PP states that although the
applicant was diagnosed with PTSD, there is no clear evidence
that this diagnosis prevented her from achieving a passing FA.
Additionally, she signed both the Fitness Screening Questionnaire
and her FA results acknowledging her scores were accurate. After
reviewing the applicant’s test score history from 2005 to 2010,
we note she also had two previous FAs in addition to the two FAs
in question. Her FAs, dated 26 May 2011 and 23 August 2011 were
administered in accordance with Air Force Instruction 36-2905,
Air Force Fitness Program.
The complete A1PP evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 25 April 2012, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit
C). As of this date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel
will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved.
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
2
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-00675 in Executive Session on 9 August 2012, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 9 Feb 12, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 26 Mar 12, w/atch.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 Apr 12.
The following documentary evidence was considered in connection
with AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-00675:
Panel Chair
3
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 03584
He still felt pain in his left knee and the cool weather seemed to intensify the pain level. RMG/CC states, the applicants records indicate he was eligible for promotion with a 1 Jan 2011 effective date. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03584
He still felt pain in his left knee and the cool weather seemed to intensify the pain level. RMG/CC states, the applicants records indicate he was eligible for promotion with a 1 Jan 2011 effective date. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03826
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. A1PP recommends removing the 9 August 2011 FA score from AFFMS due to supporting documentation from the applicants evaluating physician and treating physical therapist. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04477
She took another FA on 16 September 2011, receiving a score of 82.10, failing the sit-up component of the FA. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. Exhibit D. Letter, Applicant, dated 5 September...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01345
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01345 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The fitness assessment (FA) score she received on 29 December 2010 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The complete A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04745
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04745 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. On 24 Apr 10, she petitioned the AFBCMR (Docket Number BC-2010- 02102) to void her referral EPR for the period 18 Oct 07 through 28 Oct 08, contending she was not given sufficient time to adjust to the new workout plan given to her by her doctors. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01097
Members will be eligible for FA 42 days after the expiration date of physical limitations, as annotated on Air Force (AF) Form 469. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends the cardio component of the applicant’s FA, dated 29 November 2011, be updated to reflect “exempt” in AFFMS. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In accordance with AFI 36-2603,...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03234
The temperature at the time of the test was below 20 degrees Fahrenheit and as required by AFI 36-2905, Air Force Fitness Program, the test should not have been administered. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicants military records are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Jan 12.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02810
The applicant failed the Muscular Fitness portion of the test therefore his overall FA rating was Unsatisfactory. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. Accordingly there is no need to recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04234
DPSIM states that on 25 September 2012, a memorandum was sent to the applicant requesting additional documentation - specifically, a memo from the 382nd TRS superintendent stating that she was administered a fitness assessment by a non-PTL, non-prior service, technical student and a copy of her signed fitness assessment score sheet dated 5 June 2012. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department...