Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00605
Original file (BC-2012-00605.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00605 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed from North Dakota to 
Germany. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

When she entered the military, she listed Grand Forks, North 
Dakota as her HOR because she lived there with her ex-husband 
who was stationed at Grand Forks AFB. Her real HOR is where her 
records reside in Germany. After her retirement, she would like 
to return to Germany to her immediate family. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

According to the applicant’s military personnel records, she 
retired from the Regular Air Force in the grade of technical 
sergeant on 1 Apr 12. 

 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of 
the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence 
of an error or injustice. The applicant’s records reflect North 
Dakota as the state in which she lived on 19 Mar 92 when she 
entered the Air Force. Grand Forks, ND has been consistently 
listed throughout her career as her HOR. The Joint Federal 
Travel Regulation (JFTR) for Uniformed Service Members states 
the HOR is the place recorded as the home of the individual when 
commissioned, appointed, enlisted, inducted, or ordered into a 
tour of active duty. Therefore, the applicant’s HOR is and 
should remain Grand Forks, North Dakota. 


 

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIPE evaluation, with attachment, 
is at Exhibit C. 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 27 Mar 12 for review and comment within 30 days. 
As of this date, no response has been received by this office 
(Exhibit D). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion 
the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. 
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis upon which to recommend favorable action on this 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-00605 in Executive Session on 6 Sep 12, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

 


The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-00605 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 31 Jan 12. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIPE, dated 5 Mar 12, w/atch. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Mar 12. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 03114

    Original file (BC 2012 03114.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 20 Aug 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04350

    Original file (BC-2011-04350.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed from New Jersey to Texas. DPSIPE states the member's initial DD Form 4 reflects Wrightstown, New Jersey as the city/state in which she lived prior to entering the Air Force and has been consistently listed throughout her military records as her HOR. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01600

    Original file (BC-2012-01600.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01600 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed from XXXXXXX, Virginia to XXXXXXX, Texas. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03296

    Original file (BC 2014 03296.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03296 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to include the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC), Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA) and Basic Missile Occupational Badge. (Administratively Corrected) APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She served at Grand Forks Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00367

    Original file (BC-2012-00367.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00367 IN THE MATTER OF: COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed to El Paso TX. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial of the applicant's request to change her HOR from Philadelphia, PA to EL...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04298

    Original file (BC-2012-04298.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04298 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed from Tucson, Arizona to Navarre, Florida. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is attached at...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02679

    Original file (BC-2012-02679.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02679 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed from Dayton, Ohio to Fremont, California. Her complete submission is at Exhibit A. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01906

    Original file (BC-2012-01906.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS HEARING DESIRED: NO DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01906 COUNSEL: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home of Record (HOR) be changed to 2330 Buckboard Trail, Cottonwood, AZ 86326. The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicant’s military service records, are contained in the evaluation by the Air Force office of primary responsibility...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03907

    Original file (BC-2012-03907.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Her DD Form 4/1, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States, reflects East Tawas, MI as her home of record at the time of her enlistment. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01621

    Original file (BC 2013 01621.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The time reflected in block 11 (Primary Specialty) of her DD Form 214 of 5 years and 10 months should be the same as the time (6 years) in block 12 (Record of Service). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C, D and E. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial of the...