AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00450
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
IN THE MATTER OF:
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His official military records be corrected by having his Fitness
Assessment (FA), dated 27 Jan 11, declared void and removed from
the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He should not have been allowed to participate in the 27 Jan 11
FA. He injured himself during squadron physical training prior
to the FA. He was diagnosed with a herniated disk and nerve
damage in both legs and his right arm, but the full impact of
his injuries was not known until after he had failed the FA.
In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of a
Talking Paper from his Squadron Commander on his medical
situation, information from his civilian neurologist, his memo
requesting he be retested with 42 days of his failed FA, his Air
Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS) profile, an AF Form 469,
Duty Limiting Condition Report, and selected excerpts from his
medical records.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
According to the applicant’s military personnel records, he
currently serves in the Regular Air Force in the grade of Master
Sergeant (E-7).
According to Air Force Guidance Memorandum 4 (AFGM-4) to
AFI 36 -2905, Fitness Program, dated 26 Jun 12, if an Airman
becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete
all required components, he/she has the option of being
evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) but his/her
test will count unless rendered invalid by the Unit Commander.
The FA Coordinator (FAC) or Unit Fitness Program Manager (UFPM)
holds scores of Airmen who become injured or ill for 5 duty days
to allow Medical and Commander review. Scores can be entered in
AFFMS on the 6th day if the Commander does not invalidate the
results.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of
the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of
an error or injustice. On 23 Feb 12, a memorandum was sent to
the applicant requesting documentation. Specifically, the
applicant’s AF Form 469, the AF Form 422, the Physical Profile,
and AF Form 108, Physical Fitness Education and Intervention
Processing. The applicant was unable to provide the AF Form 422
which indicates the member’s limitations for FA components.
Additionally, the applicant did not provide a copy of his AF
Form 108 from his local MTF indicating he had a preexisting
medical condition that precluded him from achieving a passing
score.
The complete AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
He reiterates that the extent of his injuries should have been
discovered prior to the 27 Jan 11 FA in which he failed the walk
test. If the FA had been properly postponed until his medical
assessment and treatment were complete, he would not have had to
apply to the AFBCMR. The AFPC/DPSIM advisory focuses on the
fact that he failed to provide AF Forms 469, 422, and 108.
However, he did not have these documents, so he submitted
medical journal proof that his injury existed more than two
months prior to his FA failure. His neurologist stated that he
should not have been walking the distances required for the walk
portion of the assessment. He has provided significant evidence
to prove his injuries existed prior to 27 Jan 11, and believes
the failed FA should be removed from the AFFMS. In support of
his response, the applicant submits copies of several documents
from his Chronological Record of Medical Care.
The applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at
Exhibit E.
________________________________________________________________
2
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. The
applicant contends that he should not have been required to
participate in the contested fitness assessment (FA) due to the
injury he incurred during physical training. After a thorough
review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s complete
submission, to include his response to the Air Force evaluation,
we believe that a preponderance of the evidence supports
corrective action. While we note the comments from AFPC/DPSIM
indicating the documentation provided by the applicant is not
sufficient to conclude the contested FA should have been
invalidated, we find the evidence sufficient to conclude that
his condition had yet to be thoroughly evaluated by the time he
participated in the contested FA and, as such, appears to have
precluded him from receiving a fair FA. In this respect, we
note the applicant has provided a supporting statement from his
neurologist indicating that at the time of the FA the applicant
suffered from a herniated disk and nerve damage which restricted
his ability to successfully complete the FA. Therefore, we
recommend the applicant’s records be corrected as indicated
below.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that his
27 January 2011 Fitness Assessment (FA) be declared void and
removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-00450 in Executive Session on 16 Aug 12, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
3
All members voted to correct the records as recommended. The
following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-00450 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 20 Jan 12, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 16 Apr 12, w/atch.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 May 12.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 14 May 12, w/atchs.
Panel Chair
4
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04056
The evidence provided by the applicant did not include medical provider recommended exemptions for the cardio component. If the medical evaluation validates the illness or injury and provides supporting medical documentation, the Unit Commander may invalidate the FA results by notifying the FAC in writing. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03392
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. While the applicant has not provided a letter from his commander invalidating the FA, he has provided an AF Form 108 signed by his medical provider stating that he did in fact have a medical condition that precluded him from passing the contested FA. Therefore, the majority of the Board recommends the applicants records be corrected as indicated below.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02244
In support of his appeal, the applicant provided an AF Form 108 signed by his medical provider stating that there was a medical condition that precluded him from passing the FA and recommended invalidation of the FA. The applicants last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 24 Jul 13 80.33 Satisfactory *25 Apr 13 26.33 Unsatisfactory 12 Oct 12 82.33 Satisfactory 28 Mar 12 85.44 Satisfactory 30 Dec 11 72.00 Unsatisfactory * Contested FA On 2 Jan 14 a similar request...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02467
On 2 Jan 14, the request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis of Insufficient evidence; specifically AF Form 422 and medical documentation from an Air Force doctor. In accordance with (IAW) guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905_ Fitness Program AFGM5 (3 Jan 13), Attachment 1, Section 10, If an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have the option of being...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04196
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04196 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His fitness assessment (FA), dated 12 July 2012, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). As such, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04034
On 14 Feb 14, the applicants request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB). The FSQ should be completed no earlier than 30 calendar days, but no later than 7 days prior to FA to provide time for medical evaluation, when indicated; however, failure to complete FSQ does not invalidate the FA. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Feb 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03684
An AF Form 469 Duty Limiting Report issued after the contested FA supports his claim of an injury. The AF Form 469 also restricts him from the cardio portion of an FA for the period of 29 May 13 to 23 Jul 13. While an invalidation letter from the commander and an AF FM 422 was not submitted, a majority of the Board recognize the applicant submitted a personal statement and an AF Form 469 signed by his medical provider, indicating that he injured his ankle during the contested FA, which did...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02896
In accordance with (IAW) AFI 36-2905, Air Force Guidance Memorandum on Fitness Program “if an airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have the option of being evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) but his/her test will still count unless rendered invalid by the unit commander.” In this instance it is clear the applicant did not report to the MTF upon completion of her FA due to the elevated heart rate. We...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01550
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01550 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 19 Dec 12 and a duplicate FA entry dated 1 Sep 10 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). He received an AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Member's Qualification Status, dated 9...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02331
On 2 Jan 14, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis the applicant did not provide sufficient evidence; specifically AF Form 422. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 11 Feb 14, applicant provided a memorandum in rebuttal of AFPC/DPSIM and FAAB memoranda. While we note an...