Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00449
Original file (BC-2012-00449.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-00449 
COUNSEL:  NONE 
HEARING DESIRED:  NO 

 
 
IN THE MATTER OF: 
 
    
 
   
 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
Thirty days of lost leave be reinstated. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
He  was  on  convalescent  leave  during  all  of  Fiscal  Year 
2011 (FY11) and was unable to use his 30 days of leave.   
 
In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of all 
of his FY11 AF IMT 988s, Leave Request/Authorization. 
 The  applicant’s  complete  submission,  with  attachments,  is  at 
Exhibit A. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
The relevant facts pertaining to this application are described 
in  the  letter  prepared  by  the  Air  Force  Office  of 
responsibility,  which  is  included  at  Exhibit  C.    Therefore, 
there  is  no  need  to  recite  these  facts  in  this  record  of 
proceedings. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of 
an  error  or  injustice.    AFI  36-3003,  Military  Leave  Program, 
paragraph  10.9.,  requires  the  applicant  to  clearly  establish 
that an error or injustice by the Air Force caused the member’s 
lost  leave,  and  paragraph  10.8.3.  clearly  states  that  members 
are  not  authorized  restoration  of  leave  for  hospitalizations, 
aeromedical  evacuations,  quarters,  and  convalescent  leaves. 
There was no injustice by the Air Force that caused the member 
to  lose  leave  days.    Recommend  denying  relief  because  the 
applicant’s leave was convalescent.   
 

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
A  copy  of  the  Air  Force  evaluation  was  forwarded  to  the 
applicant  on  27  Mar  12  for  review  and  comment  within  30  days.  
As  of  this  date,  no  response  has  been  received  by  this  office 
(Exhibit D). 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The  applicant  has  exhausted  all  remedies  provided  by 
existing law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was timely filed. 
 
3.  Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  an  error  or  injustice.    We  took 
notice  of  the  applicant’s  complete  submission  in  judging  the 
merits  of  the  case;  however,  we  agree  with  the  opinion  and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
(OPR)  and  adopt  its  rationale  as  the  basis  for  our  conclusion 
the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  
Therefore,  in  the  absence  of  evidence  to  the  contrary,  we  find 
no basis to recommend granting the relief. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 
 
The  applicant  be  notified  the  evidence  presented  did  not 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  material  error  or  injustice;  the 
application  was  denied  without  a  personal  appearance;  and  the 
application  will  only  be  reconsidered  upon  the  submission  of 
newly  discovered  relevant  evidence  not  considered  with  this 
application. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  AFBCMR  Docket 
Number BC-2012-00449 in Executive Session on 7 Aug 12, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 
 
 
 
 
 

  Panel Chair 
  Member 
  Member 

 

 
2 

The  following  documentary  evidence  pertaining  to  AFBCMR  Docket 
Number BC-2012-00449 was considered: 
 
     Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 20 Jan 12, w/atchs. 
     Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 
     Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 1 Mar 12. 
     Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Mar 12. 
 
 
 
 
                                     
                                   Panel Chair 
 
 
 

 
3 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01730

    Original file (BC-2012-01730.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She was profiled [sic] from taking leave while undergoing the Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) processes. DPSIM states that IAW AFI 36-3003, Military Leave Program, a member’s application must clearly establish that an error or injustice by the Air Force caused the member’s lost leave. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04892

    Original file (BC-2012-04892.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    If the Board restores leave to the current leave account, the applicant must use these days before the end of the current FY. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that one-half (0.5) day of leave be restored to his account commencing on 2 October 2013. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 December 2012.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01886

    Original file (BC 2013 01886.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    According to the applicant’s Master Military Pay Account statement dated 12 Dec 2012, he lost 15 days of leave in FY12. Requests must clearly establish that an error or injustice caused by the Air Force prevented the member from using the lost leave. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Feb 2014.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01333

    Original file (BC-2011-01333.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01333 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 25.5 days of leave be restored and she receive payment for those days. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04787

    Original file (BC-2012-04787.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary which is attached at Exhibits C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial, indicating the applicant has not demonstrated a clear error or injustice. If at any time the leave balance drops to or goes below 75 days, then there is no longer any SLA protected leave. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04876

    Original file (BC-2011-04876.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Then, she was on convalescent leave and in rehabilitation until 17 Sep 11, and not permitted to leave the local area due to her medical condition. The applicant lost 16 days of leave because her extensive convalescent leave and rehabilitation precluded her from taking ordinary leave. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03927

    Original file (BC-2011-03927.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPSIM recommends relief for 6 days only as the 45 days the applicant requests has already been reinstated. The additional DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant submitted copies of her Leave and Earnings Statement showing her leave balance was 63 days. Exhibit B.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01854

    Original file (BC 2014 01854.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    According to the information provided, there was no error or injustice caused by the Air Force which would have prevented the applicant from using the 10.5 days of lost leave. The complete DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 11 August 2014, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05768

    Original file (BC 2012 05768.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05768 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Thirteen days of leave he lost at the end of Fiscal Year 2011 (FY11) be restored. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05768

    Original file (BC 2012 05768.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05768 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Thirteen days of leave he lost at the end of Fiscal Year 2011 (FY11) be restored. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached...