Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00490
Original file (BC-2012-00490.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00490 
COUNSEL: NONE 
HEARING DESIRED: NO 

IN THE MATTER OF: 
   
   
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his 
dependents.  
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
1.  In  Jul  09,  he  completed  the  request  to  transfer  his  Post-
9/11 GI  Bill  benefits;  however,  his  request  was  denied  in  Aug 
09.   
 
2.  He  was  in  a  medical  evaluation  board  (MEB)  status  and  made 
several  attempts  for  clarification;  however,  the  servicing 
military personnel flight (MPF), education office, and military 
treatment  facility  (MTF)  were  unable  to  provide  assistance 
because of the limited information at the time.   
 
3.  He  should  have  been  allowed  to  transfer  his  benefits  under 
the “pending permanent disability retirement category.”  
 
In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his 
DD  Form  214,  Certificate  of  Release  or  Discharge  from  Active 
Duty, a special order, and an email.   
 
The  applicant's  complete  submission,  with  attachment,  is  at 
Exhibit A. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
On  29  Jul  09,  the  applicant  was  permanently  disability  retired 
in the grade of master sergeant after serving 22 years, 5 months 
and 11 days on active duty.  
 
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained  in  the  letter  prepared  by  the  appropriate  office  of 
the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C.  
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
 
 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
HQ  AFPC/DPSIT  recommends  denial.    DPSIT  states  the  applicant 
retired  effective  29  Jul  09  and  the  program  for  Transfer  of 
Benefits (TEB) started 1 Aug 09.  There has been no injustice to 
the  extent  that  the  applicant  did  not  receive  adequate 
counseling  as  required  by  law  and  Department  of  Defense  (DoD) 
regulation.  
 
The complete DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 27 Mar 12 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D).  
As of this date, this office has not received a response.  
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was timely filed. 

 3.  Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has 
not been the victim of an error or injustice.  Therefore, in the 
absence  of  evidence  to  the  contrary,  we  find  no  basis  to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.  
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 
 
The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  material  error  or  injustice;  that 
the  application  was  denied  without  a  personal  appearance;  and 
that  the  application  will  only  be  reconsidered  upon  the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.  
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 

2 

 
 
 

Panel Chair 
Member 
Member 

The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  AFBCMR  BC-2012-
00490 in Executive Session on 13 Sep 12, under the provisions of 
AFI 36-2603: 
 

 
The following documentary evidence was considered: 
 
    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 8 Feb 12, w/atch. 
    Exhibit B.  Applicant’s Master Personnel Record. 
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 19 Mar 12. 
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Mar 12.  
 
 
 
 
                                 Panel Chair 

3 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00490

    Original file (BC-2013-00490.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00490 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be allowed to transfer her Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to her dependents. DPSIT states the applicant retired effective 31 Mar 09 (sic). While it is unfortunate that she was retired six months short of attaining eligibility to transfer...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03477

    Original file (BC-2012-03477.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFPC indicated they used the application date not the retirement date to determine eligibility. Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09 who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill and has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election can transfer their unused Post-9/11 benefits to their dependents. In accordance with AFI 36-3203, Service Retirements, paragraph 2.22, Request for Withdrawal or Change...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02875

    Original file (BC 2013 02875.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Post-9/11 GI Bill TEB requires: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted) on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and: * Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03052

    Original file (BC-2012-03052.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Both documents were published on government-hosted websites prior to 1 Aug 09, the effective date of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. Based on the facts provided, the applicant did not transfer his benefits to his dependents prior to his retirement and he has not provided any evidence that his failure to do so was the result of his being improperly briefed prior to retirement. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03098

    Original file (BC-2012-03098.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03098 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational benefits to his dependents. There is no record of the applicant making a Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) to his dependents. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03571

    Original file (BC-2012-03571.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03571 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to his dependents while he was on active duty. The program for Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) started 1 Aug 09. On 31 August 2009, he elected to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03099

    Original file (BC-2012-03099.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPSIT recommends denial, since the applicant retired in 2007, prior to the 1 Aug 09 effective date of the Post-9/11 GI Bill Program Title 38, Chapter 33, § 3319(f)(1) states “an individual may transfer such...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01574

    Original file (BC-2012-01574.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve (SelRes), officer or enlisted) on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and: • Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve a specified additional period in the Armed Forces from the date of election. The Air Force provided unfair and misleading information concerning Post 9-11 transferability by stating that enrolled members were...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03442

    Original file (BC-2012-03442.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Post-9/11 G.I Bill was enacted by Congress to provide veterans who served on active duty after 11 Sep 01 with an enhanced educational assistance benefit. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant's submission, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility that since the applicant retired prior to the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03161

    Original file (BC-2012-03161.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03161 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to apply to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill education benefits to his dependents. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is...