Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00531
Original file (BC-2012-00531.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 
DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-00531 
COUNSEL:  NONE 
HEARING DESIRED:  NO 

IN THE MATTER OF: 
   
    
 
______________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
Her  Reentry  (RE)  code  of  2C,  which  denotes  "Involuntarily 
separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation 
without characterization of service," be changed to a 1C. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
She  now  realizes  the  significance  of  the  Air  Force  core  values 
and would like to serve and one day retire from the military. 
 
Before  she  submitted  her  request  she  donated  time  to  her 
community. 
 
In  support  of  her  request  the  applicant  provides  a  personal 
statement. 
 
The  applicant's  complete  submission,  with  attachment,  is  at 
Exhibit A. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
On 23 Nov 2010, the applicant enlisted in the regular Air Force. 
 
On  15  Feb  2011,  her  commander  notified  her  he  was  recommending 
she  be  discharged  under  the  provisions  of  AFI  36-3208, 
Administrative  Separation  of  Airmen.    The  specific  reason  for 
this action is her failure to adapt to the military environment. 
 
On  15  Feb  2011,  the  applicant  acknowledged  receipt  of  the 
discharge notification and provided a response. 
 
On 28 Feb 2011, she received an entry level separation with an 
uncharacterized character of service.  The narrative reason for 
separation  was  “Entry  Level  Performance  and  Conduct.”    She 
served three months and eight days of total active service. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 

 

 

 
THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
HQ AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial.  DPSOA states she received a RE 
code  of  2C  based  on  her  entry  level  separation  with 
uncharacterized service. 
 
She does not provide proof of an error or injustice in reference 
to  her  RE  code.    She  states  she  requests  RE  code  1C,  however 
there is no such RE code. 
 
The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
On 12 Apr 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded 
to  the  applicant  for  review  and  comment  within  30  days.  To 
date, a response has not been received (Exhibit C). 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The  applicant  has  exhausted  all  remedies  provided  by 
existing law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was timely filed. 
 
3.  Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not 
been  the  victim  of  an  error  or  injustice.    Therefore,  in  the 
absence  of  evidence  to  the  contrary,  we  find  no  basis  to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 
 
The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  material  error  or  injustice;  that 
the  application  was  denied  without  a  personal  appearance;  and 
that  the  application  will  only  be  reconsidered  upon  the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 

 

2 

 
 

Panel Chair 
Member 
Member 

 The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-
2012-00531  in  Executive  Session  on  25  Jul  2012,  under  the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 
 
 
 The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-
2012-00531: 
 
    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 13 Oct 2011, w/atch. 
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 21 Mar 2012. 
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 12 Apr 2012. 
 
 
 
 
                                     
                                   Panel Chair 

 

3 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04700

    Original file (BC-2011-04700.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04700 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her character of service be changed from uncharacterized to honorable and her reentry (RE) code “2C” (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to allow her to reenter...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00485

    Original file (BC-2010-00485.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00485 INDEX CODE: 110.02, 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reentry (RE) code of 2C (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to RE code 1C and that she be allowed to return to active duty. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03631

    Original file (BC-2011-03631.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant entered the Air Force on 2 Nov 10. Her desire to reenter the military is noted, however, each component of the military decides what conditions and RE codes they will or will not accept for prior service members, which may change over time. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-03631 in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03496

    Original file (BC-2011-03496.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03496 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of “4C” (Separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for enlistment, failure to attain a 9.0 reading grade level as measured by the Air Force Reading Abilities Test, or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03860

    Original file (BC-2012-03860.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03860 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. On 17 Apr 09, the applicant was notified of her commander’s intent to recommend that she be discharged from the Air Force under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen for Fradulent Enlistment. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01439

    Original file (BC-2011-01439.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The complete AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He is trying to enlist in the Navy and believes he should not be banned from serving his country for failing a test. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice to warrant changing the applicant’s RE code of “2C.” The evidence of record indicates the applicant was given...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01630

    Original file (BC-2011-01630.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The complete SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change her narrative reason for separation and separation code. Had the Air Force known of this condition at the time of her enlistment, she would not have been allowed entry into the military. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04948

    Original file (BC 2013 04948.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial of the applicant request to change her separation code. The correct RE code is 2C, which denotes “involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service,” as required by AFI 36-2606, Reenlistments in the United States Air Force, chapter 3, based on her entry-level separation with an uncharacterized character of service. AFPC/DPSOY will provide the applicant with a corrected copy...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03745

    Original file (BC 2014 03745.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Her RE code is unjust because she was not offered the opportunity to reclassify into another career field after failing a test in technical training. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01441

    Original file (BC-2010-01441.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01441 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her uncharacterized entry level separation, separation code of “JFW” which denotes failed medical/physical procurement standards, and reentry (RE) code of 4C (separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for...