Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00533
Original file (BC-2012-00533.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 

 
 

 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 

DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-00533 
COUNSEL: NONE 
HEARING DESIRED:  NO 

IN THE MATTER OF:   
 
 
     
 
     
 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:  
 
His home of record be changed to Clay Center, Kansas. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
He  does  not  believe  his  home  of  record  is  in  error  or  unjust.  
He was told upon separating, he could change it to his spouse’s 
home of record.  
 
In  support  of  his  appeal,  the  applicant  provides  mail  from  his 
spouse’s previous residence, a W-2 and other correspondence. 
 
The  applicant’s  complete  submission,  with  attachments,  is  at 
Exhibit A. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
The  applicant  is  currently  serving  on  active  duty  in  the  grade 
of  senior  airman.    He  entered  the  Regular  Air  Force  on 
22 January 2007.  The applicant’s enlistment agreement reflects 
Lexington, South Carolina as his home of record at the time of 
enlistment.  
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial.  The applicant’s records reflect 
South  Carolina  is  the  state  he  lived  in  prior  to  entering  the 
Air  Force.    Additionally,  Lexington,  South  Carolina  has  been 
consistently  listed  throughout  the  applicant’s  military  records 
and  was  listed  as  his  home  of  record  upon  enlistment  into  the 
Air Force.   
 
The  Joint  Federal  Travel  Regulation  for  Uniformed  Service 
Members appendix states the home of record is the place recorded 
as  the  home  of  the  individual  when  commissioned,  appointed, 
enlisted,  inducted  or  ordered  into  a  tour  of  active  duty.  

Therefore,  the  applicant’s  home  of  record  should  remain  South 
Carolina.   
 
There  is  no  error  or  justification  that  warrants  the  requested 
change of record. 
 
The  complete  DPSIPE  evaluation,  with  attachment,  is  at 
Exhibit C. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
A  copy  of  the  Air  Force  evaluation  was  forwarded  to  the 
applicant  on  27  March  2012,  for  review  and  comment  within 
30 days (Exhibit D).  As of this date, this office has received 
no response. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The  applicant  has  exhausted  all  remedies  provided  by 
existing law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was timely filed. 
 
3.  Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not 
been  the  victim  of  an  error  or  injustice.    Therefore,  in  the 
absence  of  evidence  to  the  contrary,  we  find  no  basis  to 
favorably consider this application. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 
 
The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  material  error  or  injustice;  that 
the  application  was  denied  without  a  personal  appearance;  and 
that  the  application  will  only  be  reconsidered  upon  the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
 
 
 

2 

 
 
 

  
  
 

  Panel Chair 
  Member 
  Member 

The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  AFBCMR  Docket 
Number  BC-2012-00533  in  Executive  Session  on  9  August  2012, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 
 
 
 
 
The following documentary evidence was considered: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                                   Panel Chair 
 

Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 23 Jan 12, w/atchs. 
Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 
Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIPE, dated 13 Mar 12, w/atch. 
Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Mar 12. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02240

    Original file (BC-2012-02240.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02480 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home of Record (HOR) be changed from XXXXXXX, Arizona (AZ) to XXXXXXX, Massachusetts (MA). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01382

    Original file (BC-2012-01382.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01382 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home of Record (HOR) be changed from Florida to Minnesota. His complete submission is at Exhibit A. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 03114

    Original file (BC 2012 03114.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 20 Aug 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01600

    Original file (BC-2012-01600.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01600 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed from XXXXXXX, Virginia to XXXXXXX, Texas. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 02520

    Original file (BC 2012 02520.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, Southaven, MS is consistently listed throughout his records as his HOR. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00605

    Original file (BC-2012-00605.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00605 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed from North Dakota to Germany. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01162

    Original file (BC 2014 01162.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01162 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home of Record (HOR) be changed from Laughlin, Texas to Akron, Ohio. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04350

    Original file (BC-2011-04350.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed from New Jersey to Texas. DPSIPE states the member's initial DD Form 4 reflects Wrightstown, New Jersey as the city/state in which she lived prior to entering the Air Force and has been consistently listed throughout her military records as her HOR. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02152

    Original file (BC-2012-02152.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Therefore, the applicant’s home of record is the Boston Georgia address. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. , Chair , Member , Member ________________________________________________________________ The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03867

    Original file (BC 2012 03867.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s records reflect Atwater, California as the HOR at which he resided prior to entering the Air Force. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...