AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03385
DPAPP states that the DD Form 214 was only annotated yes if the service member was actually assigned in either, Indochina, Vietnam or Korea. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In 1971, he received orders to Cam Ranh Bay, RVN and was assigned to the Air Force Security Service Detachment for 30- 45 days. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03396
On 7 October 2011, the applicant was released from active duty at the completion of his required active service. Therefore, we find it reasonable to conclude that since the applicants LOD injury required surgery within two months of his release from active duty that said injury rendered him unfit at the time of his release and, thus, should have formed the basis of his retention on MEDCON orders until he had recuperated from his surgery. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03399
On 27 August 2007, the applicant was notified of her commanders intent to recommend she be discharged from the Air Force for conditions that interfered with military service: Mental Disorders Adjustment Disorder. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application is contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C and Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03402
On 7 Dec 10, the LOD Board administrator signed, for the Air Force Reserve Vice Commander, deciding that the applicants injury was In the Line of Duty (INLOD). He has AF Forms 422s and 469s that reflect his duty limitations and currently/supposedly going through a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) process. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03414
His DD Form 4/1, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States, reflects Middleton, MA as his home of record at the time of his enlistment. The applicants records reflect Middleton, MA as the home of record where he resided prior to entering the Air Force. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice;...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03425
________________________________________________________________ _ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is a former member of the Regular Air Force who served on active duty from 6 October 1982 to 22 March 1988. DFAS-IN states that per their computation, the applicant was paid for five years, as his Total Active Federal Military Service Date (TAFMSD) was 6 October 1982 and his date of separation was 22 March 1988. He would have had to serve over 5 years and 6 months to be entitled to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03427
Upon retirement, he was informed that this pay did not exist. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. A review of the applicants record revealed that on 26 June 1969, The Office...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03436
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03436 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded to an Honorable discharge. He has lived with and paid for this one mistake for 40 years of his life. Specifically, section 1522(f)(1) permits the correction of a record to reflect...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03439
He was sent an email on 23 February 2010 requesting him to sign and return the SOU. Based on the fact that the applicant signed the ADSC and served the time requirement clearly establishes his intent to transfer benefits to his dependents. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 10 March 2010, he elected to transfer...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03442
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Post-9/11 G.I Bill was enacted by Congress to provide veterans who served on active duty after 11 Sep 01 with an enhanced educational assistance benefit. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant's submission, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility that since the applicant retired prior to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03443
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03443 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _____________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of rank (DOR) for the grade of technical sergeant (E-6) be changed from 1 June 12 to 7 April 12. On 31 May 2012, the applicant was promoted to the grade of technical sergeant (E-6), effective and with a DOR of 1 June 2012. The remaining...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03445
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03445 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to honorable. He served on the usher board, mens counsel and youth activities. He was credited with 1 year, 3 months and 12 days of active duty service.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03447
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03447 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded. Based on the documents provided by the applicant and the limited information in the Air Force Automated Military Justice Analysis and Management System (AMJAMS), there is no apparent error or injustice in...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03448
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2012- 03448 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Flying Class I (FCI) physical, dated 27 November 2006, be corrected or removed from his record. During his FCI physical, he passed the color vision exam required of all FCI, FCIA, and FCIII applicants. The complete SGAT evaluation is at...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03452
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03452 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded and Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM). After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicants complete submission, we do not find the evidence presented by the applicant is...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03455
On 27 Jun 12, the IPEB recommended the applicant be returned to duty due to his mandatory high-year of tenure date which placed him in a presumptive period of fitness. However, DoDI 1332.38, Physical Disability Evaluation, explains that Service members who are pending retirement at the time they are referred for physical disability evaluation enter the DES under a rebuttable presumption they are physically fit. In this respect, we note the comments of the AFBCMR Medical Consultant...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03458
Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility that the RE code which was assigned at the time of his separation accurately reflects the circumstances of his separation; evidence has not been provided that would lead us to believe otherwise. BY DIRECTION OF THE CHAIR Chief Examiner Air Force Board for Correction of Military...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03460
After the FA he had a medical review and received an updated AF Form 469. The complete AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 6 November 2012 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit E). ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03461
She had the legal right to receive SBP counseling from the nearest active duty base since she was being medically retired by the Air Force. On 20 March 2012, the IPEB evaluated the applicants case with the proposed DVA ratings and concluded that the applicants medical conditions prevented her from reasonably performing her military duties and were not likely to change over the next several years. They advised that the request for correction should go through the Air Force (AF) SBP...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03466
In response to the Air Force advisory, he amended his requests to include that his Assignment Action Reason (AAR) be changed to reflect Hardship/Death of Family Member, rather than QL/Civilian Airline Industry. The applicant contends that he was incorrectly assigned to the Inactive Ready Reserve with an inaccurate Assignment Action Reason. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03469
The applicant fails to recognize that the PRF is not the only record which documents performance within the Officer Selection Record (OSR) at the time of CSB promotion consideration. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit B. AFPC/DPSOO recommends denying the applicants request for direct promotion to the grade of Lt Col; however, they support Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration in order for the applicant to write a letter to the CY2011A Lt Col CSB highlighting...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03471
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03471 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 17 days of lost leave be restored, or as an alternative, he be allowed to sell back 15 days of leave. AFI 36-3003, Military Leave Program, explains Special Leave Accrual (SLA) allows members who are faced with circumstances that prohibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03473
He disagrees with the advisories that state he failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove his 2011 OPR was erroneous or unjust based on the content. Therefore, we recommend approval of the applicants request that his OPR be corrected to reflect the correct stratification statement and his record be considered for promotion to the grade of major by an SSB. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03476
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2012-03476 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessments (FAs), dated 30 March 2012 and 28 June 2012, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The Board notes the comments of the BCMR Medical Consultant, indicating there is a direct relationship between...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03477
AFPC indicated they used the application date not the retirement date to determine eligibility. Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09 who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill and has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election can transfer their unused Post-9/11 benefits to their dependents. In accordance with AFI 36-3203, Service Retirements, paragraph 2.22, Request for Withdrawal or Change...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03489
The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANTS REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The reason he did not file an appeal through the ERAB is because it would require the documented reversal or amendment of the rater evaluation or written evidence to that fact, and he disagrees with his removal from command and contests the subsequent performance report. However, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03505
The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. While the applicant contends his abdominal circumference measurements were inconsistent, we do not find the evidence provided sufficient to conclude that he has been the victim of an error or injustice. In view of this, and noting there was no documentation located or provided that indicates an error or impropriety in the physical fitness test and subsequent fitness assessment score, we agree with the opinion...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03509
The applicants last five FA results: Date Composite Score Rating 4 Nov 12 30.90 Unsatisfactory 9 Jan 11 63.00 Unsatisfactory 4 Apr 09 82.50 Good 2 Apr 08 82.50 Good 29 May 07 85.50 Good The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03511
We also note the comments of the Air Force office of primary responsibility indicating the applicant signed up to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to his dependents by going to the DVA website and also extended to obtain the necessary retainability but never received the official Statement of Understanding (SOU) from the Total Force Service Center. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03537
AFBCMR BC-2012-03537 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03549
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03549 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His military personnel records be corrected to reflect he served in the Republic of Vietnam and Southeast Asia from 10 Jul 67 through 11 Jan 68. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03550
24 Sep 10, the applicant was found to have a medical condition that did not meet medical standards, placed on a code 37 profile, and restricted from participating in her reserve military duties for pay or points. The applicant was physically disqualified for continued military service in the Air Force Reserves. The evidence of record indicates applicant was physically disqualified for continued military service due to injuries she sustained in motor vehicle accident that were not in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03554
There is no evidence the member submitted an election to change spouse coverage to former spouse coverage following their divorce, nor is there any evidence he requested the applicant be removed as his SBP spouse beneficiary. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the DECEASED FORMER MEMBER be corrected to show that on 29 February 2012, he elected former-spouse...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03555
The governing instructions states that the most effective evidence consists of statements from the evaluators who signed the report or from other individuals in the rating chain when the report was signed. However, statements from the evaluators during the contested period are conspicuously missing. Furthermore, we are not persuaded by the evidence provided that the contested report is not a true and accurate assessment of her performance and demonstrated potential during the specified...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03562
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03562 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive a ten percent increase in his retired pay for being awarded the Airmans Medal (AmnM), effective 1 Mar 85. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03563
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application....
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03565
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03565 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. He should have received proper medication and counseling when he was diagnosed while on active duty. The commander also indicated he was recommending the applicant receive...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03570
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03570 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His current Fitness Assessment (FA) failures on record be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). _______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial, noting that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03571
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03571 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to his dependents while he was on active duty. The program for Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) started 1 Aug 09. On 31 August 2009, he elected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03573
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03573 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) and all appropriate awards earned by the 37th Tactical Fighter Wing (TFW), Phu Cat AB, Republic of Vietnam. He was not considered for these awards because his...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03575
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03575 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 21 Oct 87, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicants request to have his general discharge upgraded to honorable and narrative...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03582
Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty, or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 August 2009, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, had at least 6 years of service on the date of election may transfer unused Post-9/11 benefits to their dependents. The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record; most notably, that the applicant was sent a notice to specify the number of months he wished to transfer to each dependent...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03584
Her narrative reason for separation Fraudulent Entry Into Military Service and the corresponding separation code of JDA be changed. The specific reason was on or about 4 January 2012, at a mental health evaluation conducted by a psychologist at Behavior Analysis Service (BAS), she revealed that she had a history of a suicide attempt and anger issues that occurred prior to her entry into the Air Force. Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03586
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03586 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her deceased spouses record be corrected to reflect he elected immediate annuity spousal coverage under the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP). He completed the ARPC Form 123, RCSBP Certificate, and elected Option A, Decline to make an...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03587
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03587 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation of Misconduct be changed. The applicant was notified by his commander of his intent to recommend his discharge from the Air Force under the provisions of AFR 39-10 Misconduct. Based on the documentation on...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03589
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03589 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program) and separation code of JBK (less than six years of active service), be changed to allow...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03598
________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He failed the contested FA due to a medical condition that prevented him from achieving a passing score. The DPSID complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the evaluation and states he would like to amend his request to have the EPR rendered for the period 1 February 2011...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03599
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03599 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions (UHC)) discharge be upgraded to honorable. c. Violating Article 86: Failing to go at the time prescribed to his appointed place of duty. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03619
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03619 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to Honorable. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to compel us to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03626
AFBCMR BC-2012-03626 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...