RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03505 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) score dated 30 June 2011 be removed from his records. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The abdominal circumference measurements should have been taken before the push-up and sit-up portions of the test. He came to the test with a profile and was told to obtain additional documentation. When he returned he was instructed to join in and perform the push-up and sit-up portion of the fitness test. He was then measured for abdominal circumference and measured 39 and a half. He was asked to return the next day to remeasure - and measured 38 and a half. However, the first score was recorded. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in the grade of master sergeant. The applicant’s last five FA scores are as follows: DATE SCORE * 30 June 2011 UNSATISFACTORY 5 July 2011 SATISFACTORY 13 February 2012 UNSATISFACTORY 7 June 2012 UNSATISFACTORY 10 September 2012 SATISFACTORY *Contested FA score. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. DPSIM states on 20 August 2012, a memorandum was sent to the applicant requesting additional documentation. Specifically, they requested a signed memorandum from the fitness testing administrators stating the facts of what happened/occurred during his fitness assessment. The applicant did not provide the requested documentation. The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 26 November 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit C). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case. While the applicant contends his abdominal circumference measurements were inconsistent, we do not find the evidence provided sufficient to conclude that he has been the victim of an error or injustice. In view of this, and noting there was no documentation located or provided that indicates an error or impropriety in the physical fitness test and subsequent fitness assessment score, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-03505 in Executive Session on 21 February 2013, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-03505 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 16 July 2012, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 12 November 2012, w/atchs. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 November 2012.