Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03385
Original file (BC-2012-03385.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03385
		COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of 
Transfer or Discharge, Block 30, be corrected to reflect “yes” 
after Vietnam.  

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

In 1971, he went on a temporary duty (TDY) assignment to Cam 
Ranh Bay, Republic of Vietnam (RVN) for 30-45 days and flew 
secret intelligence missions as an Air Force North Vietnamese 
linguist.  

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 31 Jan 69, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force.  
He is credited with 3 years 11 months and 17 days of total 
active service; with 2 years, 1 month and 9 days of Foreign 
Service. 

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial.  DPAPP states that the DD Form 
214 was only annotated “yes” if the service member was actually 
assigned in either, Indochina, Vietnam or Korea.  The 
applicant’s DD Form 214 reflects “yes” after Indochina because 
he was assigned in Thailand from 12 Jan 72 until his date of 
separation of 17 Jan 73.  After a thorough review of the 
applicant’s military records, they could find no mention of any 
time served in Vietnam.




The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit B.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

In 1971, he received orders to Cam Ranh Bay, RVN and was 
assigned to the Air Force Security Service Detachment for 30-
45 days.

The advisory opinion states that “after a thorough review of his 
records, DPAPP could not find any mention of time served in 
Vietnam.”  He wonders if someone has erased or misplaced his 
service records.

Blocks 23-25 of his DD Form 214 reflects that he was a North 
Vietnamese Voice Processing Specialist/Interpreter, completed a 
South East Asia Survival course, awarded the Vietnam Service 
Medal (VSM), the Republic of Vietnam Service Medal {sic}, and 
others, although it appears his Air Medal second oak leaf 
cluster (AM w/2OLC) was omitted.  

The applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit D.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice to warrant 
changing his DD Form 214 to reflect “yes” after Vietnam.  After 
thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the 
applicant’s contentions, we find no evidence which would 
persuade us that his records should be corrected to show service 
in Vietnam.  In this respect, we note that DPAPP advised the 
applicant by letter that when his DD Form 214 was accomplished, 
it was a requirement to annotate “yes” if a member was actually 
assigned in Indochina, Vietnam or Korea.  DPAPP has confirmed 
that the applicant was assigned to Thailand.  However, DPAPP 
states there is no documentation to reflect the applicant was 
assigned or TDY to Vietnam.  Without documentary evidence, we 
agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force 
office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale 
expressed as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has 
failed to sustain his burden that he has been the victim of an 
error or injustice.  We note in the applicant’s rebuttal he 
states that the Air Medal w/1OLC appears to be missing from his 
records; however, since this was not included as part of his 
original application, to insure proper staffing of the 
applicant’s request, a new DD Form 149, Application for 
Correction of Military Records is required.  In view of the 
above and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no 
basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application.  

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number    
BC-2012-03385 in Executive Session on 9 Apr 13, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

				Panel Chair
				Member
				Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 16 Jul 12, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 20 Sep 12.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Oct 12.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, Applicant, dated 9 Oct 12.




								
								Panel Chair



2


3




Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03707

    Original file (BC-2012-03707.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to his application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAA recommends denial, indicating that based on the evidence provided, a temporary duty (TDY) assignment to the RVN cannot be confirmed. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02837

    Original file (BC-2007-02837.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02837 INDEX CODE: 107.00, 113.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect temporary duty (TDY) in Vietnam, and entitlement to the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM). ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-01942

    Original file (BC-2009-01942.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01942 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be amended to reflect his Republic of Vietnam (RVN) service and medals. DPSIDR states the applicant only served in Vietnam for 13 days; thereby...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00212

    Original file (BC-2012-00212.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The RVCM is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who: served for six months in South Vietnam during the period 1 Mar 1961 and 28 Mar 1973; or served outside the geographical limits of South Vietnam and contributed direct combat support to the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Armed Forces for an aggregate of six months. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04655

    Original file (BC-2011-04655.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR) which are included at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicant’s requests...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02942

    Original file (BC-2012-02942.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02942 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that he received the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) for his service in Vietnam and Thailand. He spent over 20 total months in Thailand, Vietnam, and Okinawa in 1967, 1968, and 1969. The remaining relevant facts...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01558

    Original file (BC 2014 01558.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The VSM is awarded to all service members of the United States Armed Forces who served in Vietnam between 4 Jul 65 and 28 Mar 73 in the area of eligibility (AOE). THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01953

    Original file (BC-2003-01953.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 22 July 2003, HQ AFPC/DPAPP2 advised the applicant there were no documents in his personnel file that reflected he was on temporary duty (TDY) to Vietnam. They indicated that they have thoroughly reviewed the applicant’s records and they are unable to find any indication that he was TDY from the Philippines to Vietnam at any time. His assignment to Thailand is after the closeout date for award of the Vietnam Service Medal.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00255

    Original file (BC-2011-00255.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00255 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. DPAPP states there was no official documentation found in the applicant’s records, nor did the documentation provided substantiate Foreign Service time in the Republic of Vietnam. After a thorough review of the available evidence and the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02277

    Original file (BC-2007-02277.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02277 INDEX CODE: 100.07, 107.00, 113.00 XXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR), credit for Temporary Duty (TDY) in Vietnam, completion of J60 Engine formal...