AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03191
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03191 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) and any additional Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA). The applicants contentions are duly noted; however, after reviewing the evidence of record, we agree with the opinion and...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03206
He would have transferred his benefits had he been informed. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force which is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1Y recommends denial, indicating the Post-9/11 GI Bill, Chapter 33 became effective 1 Aug 09. ________________________________________________________________ The following...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03208
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2012-03208 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXX Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal for meritorious achievement for the period...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03209
Service members, who earned the Armed Forces Expeditionary medal for service in Vietnam between 1 Jul 58 and 3 Jul 65, may elect to receive the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) instead of the AFEM. After a thorough review of the evidence presented and the service members military personnel records, we believe a reasonable basis exists to conclude the applicant served in Vietnam. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03212
On 12 December 1942, he was discharged in the grade of aviation cadet to accept a commission and active duty per AR 615-160, Enlisted Men Aviation Cadets. Since the former members records were destroyed by fire in 1973, we must consider this application based solely on the documentation provided by the applicant and the Air Force Historical Research Agency (AFHRA). Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 December 2012, w/atch.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03214
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03214 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect his Foreign Service in Korea from 30 January through 30 June 1968. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicants complete submission, we believe a preponderance of the evidence supports...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03217
Further, there was no documentation in his official military personnel file that verifies he served in a combat ready position for 24 months. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03220
The applicants last five FA results: Date Composite Score Rating 19 Jul 12 98.25 Excellent 22 Jun 12 28.00 Unsatisfactory 11 Jan 12 96.93 Excellent 29 Jul 11 92.33 Excellent 28 Jan 11 82.78 Satisfactory The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03224
His records be corrected to reflect that his service- connected disability of Schizophrenia is combat related. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSDD recommends denial, indicating the preponderance of evidence reflects that no error or injustice occurred in...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03228
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03228 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be credited/awarded for his service in Germany during Operation DESERT SHIELD/DESERT STORM (ODS). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03229
Upon final board decision, administrative correction of the applicants official military personnel record will be completed by AFPC/DPSOY. They were unable to verify that any units in which the applicant served were awarded the PUC, rendering the applicant ineligible for the award. The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-03229 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 7 June 2012, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03230
AFBCMR BC-2012-03230 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT, be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03231
While she received orders for three of her TDYs related to her MEB processing, she traveled under the verbal orders of her commander to attend her last MEB appointment during the period 27 Mar 12 through 03 Apr 12, but has yet to receive TDY orders or travel reimbursement. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that during the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03240
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03240 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Afghanistan Campaign Medal. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission and the available evidence of record in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03244
Title 38 U.S.C., Chapter 33, Section 3319 (f) (1), DoD Directive Type Memo (DTM), and AFI 36-2306, Voluntary Education Program, state the transfer of educational benefits must be made while an individual is serving as a member of the Armed Forces when the transfer is executed. The complete DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 27 August 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03246
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03246 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His dishonorable discharge be upgraded to honorable. The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03249
He does not know what office notifies retiring military personnel of the option to transfer educational benefits and is not sure when the educational benefits began. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit B. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Nov 12.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03250
The remaining relevant facts are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIAR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. To grant her request would provide the applicant another opportunity to obtain SBP coverage after the death of the service member. We took notice of the applicant's complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03261
DPSIM states per AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, paragraph 4.2.5, all members will complete abdominal circumference (AC) assessment unless there is a composite exemption or, under rare circumstances, a component exemption determined by the exercise physiologist or fitness program manager upon recommendation by the provider. For someone who had back to back shoulder surgeries and is unable to perform physical activities for over a year, 42 days is not realistic. Exhibit D. Letter, Applicant,...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03264
AFBCMR BC-2012-03264 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: _______________ Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT,...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03266
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2012-03266 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend: APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 22 October 2010 he was not released from active duty, but on that date he continued to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03267
________________________________________________________________ _ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is a former member of the Regular Air Force who served on active duty from 1 October 1990 to 28 December 2009. The following documentary evidence was considered for AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-03267: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 25 Jul 12, w/atchs. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03272
This payment was for pay and allowances from 1 through 15 August 2008 as well as for the 60 days of leave remaining on her account. The applicants contentions are duly noted; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03286
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03286 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His fitness assessment (FA) scores dated 30 March 2012 and 18 June 2012 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). We took note of the Air Force office of primary responsibility recommendation; however, we agree with the BCMR...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03290
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03290 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be updated to reflect his Vietnam service. They were able to verify the applicant was assigned to Naha, Japan, from 22 Jun 67 thru 25 Dec 68; however,...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03292
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03292 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His fitness assessment (FA), dated 30 May 2012, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03295
AFBCMR BC-2012-03295 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03304
DPSIT states the applicant was not on active duty on or after 1 Aug 2009, therefore, he is not eligible to transfer benefits to his dependents. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03305
§ 12731 as duty under 10 U.S.C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The memorandum from ARPC/DPTT clearly states that he was ordered to active duty under the provision of Title 10, U.S.C., § 12301(d), for duty IAW § 12310. As such, since the applicant's active duty service occurred at the National Guard Bureau and his orders properly cited 10 U.S.C § 12301(d) IAW 10 U.S.C § 12310, his service does not qualify for...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03312
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPRs) which are attached at Exhibits C, D and E. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID does not make a recommendation as to whether or not the applicants actions constitute extraordinary heroism, but defers to SAF/MRBP. Recommend the applicants request be denied since the AmM would...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03316
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03316 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _______ ___ _____________________________________________ ___ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect that he was awarded the Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03320
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The medical condition that prevented him from doing the sit-up portion of the Air Force FA was not discovered until after his fourth failure and recommendation for discharge. On 22 Feb 12, the applicant participated in the second contested FA, attaining a composite score of 67.60, which constituted an unsatisfactory assessment.The following is a resume of his EPR ratings: RATING PERIOD PROMOTION...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03324
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03324 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His rank on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect Airman First Class (A1C), instead of Airman Basic (AB). His rank at the time of his discharge was not affected by his discharge under DADT. A...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03327
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The documentation on file in the master personnel records supports the basis for discharge. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03333
Prior to 14 Nov 52, the applicants records reflect the following four Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) violations on unspecified dates: 1. On 12 May 53, the Judge Advocate prepared a Petition for Grant of Review asking for a review of the conviction; however, at the time the applicant absented himself without authority. We find no evidence which indicates the applicants service characterization, which had its basis in his court-martial conviction and was a part of the sentence of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03334
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03334 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be compensated for pay, points, and applicable benefits for the loss of five days of Post Deployment/Mobilization Respite Absence (PDMRA). We note the applicant has requested pay, points, and benefits for the period that he should have been...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03341
10 On 27 March 2012, the applicant participated in a FA, attaining a composite score of 62.80, which constituted an unsatisfactory assessment. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicants complete submission, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) indicating the applicants records should be corrected to reflect he was exempt from the cardio components of the contested FAs, which will result in him...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03342 ADDENDUM
After considering all the facts and circumstances in this case, the Board determined the evidence was sufficient to conclude the applicant was the victim of an error or injustice and recommended her records be corrected to reflect that on 11 April 2009, she was found unfit to perform the duties of her office, rank, grade, or rating by reason of physical disability, incurred while she was entitled to receive basic pay; that the diagnosis in her case as major depressive disorder associated...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03345
On 25 February 2013, the applicant was provided an advisory (Exhibit D) prepared by SAF/GCM on similar cases considered by the Board. ___________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIAR does not provide a recommendation as the application involves two potential SBP beneficiaries. The applicant has not demonstrated that extraordinary circumstances exist as required for this Board to grant relief in cases of competing SBP beneficiaries.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03351
Based upon the physicians findings, the applicant was notified by her commander of his intent to recommend her for an uncharacterized entry-level separation based on fraudulent entry, under the provisions of Air Force Program Directive 36-32 and Air Force Instruction 36-3208, Chapter 5, Section 5C, Defective Enlistments, paragraph 5.15 under Basis for Discharge for Fraudulent Enlistment. Subsequently, the discharge authority approved the recommended discharge and directed the applicant be...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03358
The member could not have served the required 4 year active duty service commitment for the transfer of benefits in accordance with Air Force guidelines. He believes that had he been stationed at a base with Air Force personnel, he would have received the required briefings and information. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03360
Subsequently, the applicant and his wife were provided information and briefed on the options and effects of the SBP by their office. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 30 August 2012, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03362
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03362 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 23 December 2010 Fitness Assessment (FA) be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03363
AFBCMR BC-2012-03363 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the Fitness Assessment, dated 14 June 2012, be, and hereby is, removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03369
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03369 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he added his spouse to his Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) election instead of Children Only. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03370
If her composite score was close to 75 she would have known that she needed to do more to be sure of a passing score. DPSIM further states that after reviewing the applicants scores, her overall composite score received on 15 July 2012 is correct. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 5 November 2012 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C).
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03373
On 11 July 1994, he was released from active duty at the completion of initial active duty training and reverted to his status as a traditional (part-time) member of the Air Force Reserve and was credited with 5 months and 29 days of active service. ____________________________________________ _____________ ____ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends denial, indicating a complete review of the applicants submission and military personnel records does not show he met the required...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03374
Each request is considered based on the policies and criteria in use at the time the veteran was injured, and the determination is dependent on the documentary evidence presented. Furthermore, a review of his medical record reveals the applicant received medical treatment in 1970 for injuries he sustained due to a rocket attack in Bien Hoa AB, Vietnam. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03377
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03377 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The VSM is awarded to all service members of the U.S. Armed Forces serving at any time between 4 Jul 65 and 28 Mar 73, in the areas of eligibility (AOE). The remaining...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03378
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03378 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded decorations for his service in Vietnam to include the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal. The applicants contentions are duly noted; however, after reviewing the evidence of record, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of...