Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03573
Original file (BC-2012-03573.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03573 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Air Force 
Commendation Medal (AFCM) and all appropriate awards earned by 
the 37th Tactical Fighter Wing (TFW), Phu Cat AB, Republic of 
Vietnam. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He was assigned to the 37th Tactical Wing in Phu Cat, Vietnam and 
Detachment 1, 612th Tactical Fighter Squadron. He left Vietnam 
on emergency leave before completing his tour. He was not 
considered for these awards because his unit did not have his 
records since he hand-carried them when he left. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant’s records reflect he commenced his enlistment in 
the Regular Air Force on 24 Mar 67. 

 

The applicant’s Airman Performance Report (APR), rendered for 
the period 24 Mar 68 through 15 Nov 68, reflects he was assigned 
to Det 1, 612th Tactical Fighter Squadron, Phu Cat AB, Vietnam. 

 

The applicant was furnished an honorable discharge certificate 
on 31 Jan 74. He was credited with 6 years, 11 months, and 8 
days of active service. According to the applicant’s DD Form 
214, Report of Transfer or Discharge, he was awarded the AFOUA. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the 
AFCM and the AFOUA with Valor (AFOUA w/V). His entitlement to 
the AFCM could not be verified and the applicant has included no 


evidence to indicate he was recommended for or awarded the 
award. The AFCM is awarded to service members who, while 
serving in any capacity with the Air Force after 24 Mar 58, 
shall have distinguished themselves by meritorious achievement 
or service. The degree of merit must be distinctive, though it 
need not be unique. The official documentation required to 
verify the award of a decoration is a special order. Retirees 
and veterans may pursue award of the AFCM under the provisions 
of Title 10, Section 1130, United States Code. The law allows 
for submission of award recommendations (and the upgrading of 
previously approved awards) without regard to any previously 
imposed time constraints for submission if referred by a Member 
of Congress. The requests must be referred to the Secretary of 
the Air Force by a Member of Congress through the Secretary of 
the Air Force Liaison Office. In order for a request to be 
reasonably considered under the provision of this law, the 
following award package must contain a reconstructed award 
recommendation, a narrative citation of the action(s) for which 
the airman is being recognized and eyewitness statements 
attesting to the act(s) of valor or service performed, sworn 
affidavits, certificates, and any other related documentation. 
As for the AFOUA w/V, while the 37th Combat Support Group was 
awarded the AFOUA w/V, there were no records indicating that 
Detachment 1, 612 TFS shared in the award. As for his requests 
related to awards earned by the 37th TFW, a review of his 
records revealed the applicant is entitled to the Presidential 
Unit Citation, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with 
palm, the Vietnam Service Medal with three Bronze Service Stars, 
and the Air Force Longevity Service Award and his records will 
be corrected administratively. 

 

The complete AFPC/DPSID evaluation, with attachment, is at 
Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 22 Oct 12, for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 


3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice with respect 
to the applicant’s request for the Air Force Commendation Medal 
or the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with Valor device. We 
took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging 
the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale that relief beyond that already granted 
administratively is not warranted. Therefore, in the absence of 
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting 
the relief sought in this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-03573 in Executive Session on 11 Apr 13, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Forms 149, dated 7 Aug 12, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 9 Oct 12, w/atch. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 23 Oct 12. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05444

    Original file (BC 2013 05444.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Vietnam Service Medal with a Silver Service Star (VSM w/SSS) Army Noncommissioned Officer Professional Development Ribbon Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon with one Bronze Service Star (SAEMR w/1BSS) Air Force Training Ribbon (AFTR) ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He is authorized the requested awards and it is unclear as to why the awards from his original DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01177

    Original file (BC 2014 01177.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01177 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with Valor (AFOUA w/V) for his service with the 49th Tactical Fighter Wing (TFW) between Aug 71 and Nov 72. The Board should find it in the interest of justice to consider granting his request because he served 17 months in Vietnam and Thailand during OPERATION...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00993

    Original file (BC 2013 00993.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03427

    Original file (BC-2011-03427.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) – administratively corrected. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-00617

    Original file (BC-2009-00617.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    During the same period, the 354th TFW were awarded the PUC during the period of 10 October 1972 to 30 April 1973 and the AFOUA from 15 June 1970 to 15 May 1972. The complete AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states the 353th TFS was awarded the RVGC w/palm during the time he was deployed to Thailand from 12 October 1972 to 21 January 1973. In this regard, we...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02353

    Original file (BC 2014 02353.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02353 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM), First Oak Leaf Cluster (1BOLC) for his outstanding achievement on 16 Mar 70. While the applicant provided a copy the citation for award of the AFCM (1BOLC), his entitlement to it could not be verified. THE BOARD DETERMINES...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02625

    Original file (BC-2007-02625.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02625 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM), Purple Heart (PH), Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA), Air Force Good Conduct Medal (AFGCM), Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM) and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05439

    Original file (BC 2013 05439 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Board should consider it in the interest of justice to consider his application as he has earned these medals and they should be reflected on his DD Form 214. According to his DD Form 214, he was awarded the VSM and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM). DPSID determined the applicant should have been awarded the AFCM, RVNGC w/P and VSM w/3 BSS for his service from 29 Oct 68 to 11 Sep 72.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01222

    Original file (BC-2011-01222.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01222 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1) His record be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC), the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with Valor and one Bronze Oak Leaf Cluster (AFOUA w/V & 1BOLC), and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00721

    Original file (BC-2012-00721.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 13 Sep 12, AFPC/DPSOR notified the applicant that IAW AFI 36- 3202, Separation Documents they cannot add the statement “Vietnam Era Veteran” to his DD Form 214; however, his Kuwait Liberation Medal has been amended to read Kuwait Liberation Medal-Kuwait (KLM-K) and will be administratively corrected. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIRP recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change his name in his military personnel...